Effects of antianginal therapy on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance: comparison of the response to bepridil, propranolol, and diltiazem.

R. Zusman,D. Christensen,J. Higgins,C. Boucher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)90955-X

1992-04-09

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Prevalence, Incidence, And Associated Factors Of Pressure Injuries Among Immobile Inpatients: A Multicentre, Cross-Sectional, Exploratory Descriptive Study In China

Ying Liu,Xinjuan Wu,Yufen Ma,Zhen Li,Jing Cao,Jing Jiao,Ge Liu,Fangfang Li,Baoyun Song,Jingfen Jin,Yilan Liu,Xianxiu Wen,Shouzhen Cheng,Frances Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13054

2019-01-01

International Wound Journal

Abstract:The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, incidence, and the associated factors of pressure injuries (PIs) among immobile hospitalised patients in China. Being immobile during hospitalisation put these patients at a higher risk of PIs. There is little literature about pressure injury (PI) prevalence or PI incidence in immobile hospitalised patients in hospitals in China. This was a multicentre, cross-sectional, exploratory descriptive study. A total of 23 985 immobile patients were recruited from 25 general hospitals in six provinces of China from November 1, 2015 to March 18, 2016. Information was collected on demographic characteristics, physical assessment information, and treatment and nursing care measures. The PI period prevalence was 3.38%, and the PI cumulative incidence was 1.23%. Most PIs (84.03%) were Stage 1 or Stage 2. A total of 48.22% of PIs occurred in the sacrum or heel region. In the multivariate analysis, the following factors were associated with higher PI prevalence: age, gender, length of immobility, type of hospital, modified Braden Scale score, urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence, low serum albumin, the usage of fixation or restraint devices, and patient's discharge diagnosis (lower limb fracture, malnutrition, and spinal cord injury). PI prevalence for immobile hospitalised patients in the study was lower than those reported in literature. However, because of the large population in China, the number of patients who suffer with PIs can be very high. The relating factors of higher PI prevalence identified in this study were consistent with current literature. Patients with a higher number of these associated factors should be monitored more closely, and preventative measures should be taken to prevent PI occurrence in high-risk populations.
Incidence, prevalence and risk factors of device-related pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit: A meta-analysis of 10,084 patients from 11 countries

Yi-Jie Jia,Fei-Hong Hu,Wan-Qing Zhang,Wen Tang,Meng-Wei Ge,Wang-Qin Shen,Hong-Lin Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13112

Abstract:Device-related pressure injuries (DRPIs) prevail in the intensive care unit (ICU) and have much to do with medical devices and patients' conditions. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess the incidence, prevalence and risk factors related to DRPIs among adults in ICU. Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed and CINAHL were searched from inception to March 2023. Observational studies were included, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess literature quality. The primary outcomes were the incidence, prevalence and risk factors regarding DRPIs among adults in ICU. The 19 studies conformed to the criteria for inclusion in the review. The estimated pooled incidence of DRPIs was 14.7% (95% CI: 9.7%-19.6%) in 10 studies (4866 participants). The estimated pooled prevalence of DRPIs was 19.0% (95% CI: 13.6%-24.3%) in 9 studies (5218 participants). The most significant risk factor for DRPIs was using mechanical ventilation. The pooled analysis of the four studies showed that DRPIs were more likely to occur in patients who required mechanical ventilation compared with patients who did not use mechanical ventilation (OR: 9.67, 95% CI: 5.03-18.61, p < 0.001) and using vasopressors, age, length of ICU stays, APACHE II score, Braden score, fever, sex, oedema, diabetes and number of medical devices, SOFA score was also related to pressure injuries risk. The incidence and prevalence of DRPIs in adult ICU were high, and the most significant risk factor for DRPIs was using mechanical ventilation. It is imminent to identify patients of increased risk with DRPIs early.
Testicular Cancer.

S. Taneja

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2015.06.002

IF: 2.766

Urologic Clinics of North America

Abstract:
Incidence and Risk Factors for Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in Hemodynamically Unstable Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Luana Furtado Bueno,Manuela de Mendonça Figueirêdo Coelho,Daniel Nogueira Cortez,Juliano Teixeira Moraes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000001081

Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and identify potential risk factors for medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable adults (patients classified class III or IV on the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28; TISS-28). Design: Prospective cohort study. Subjects and setting: The target population was critically ill adults who were using one or more medical devices and categorized as class III or IV on the TISS-28. The study sample comprised 77 participants followed daily until discharge, death, transfer, or lesion development. Data were collected from January to March 2020. The study setting was an intensive care unit with 40 beds in a large hospital in a municipality in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Methods: Sociodemographic and pertinent clinical data, pressure injury (PI) risk assessed using the Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk, and head-to-toe skin inspections were completed. The incidence rate of MDRPIs was calculated, and survival analyses were completed via the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. Results: Forty-nine of 77 participants developed an MDRPI, reflecting an incidence rate of 63.6%. Collectively, 71 MDRPIs occurred in these 49 participants. Univariate analysis indicated significant associations between MDRPI occurrences and level of consciousness ( P = < .001), use of tube holder for ventilation devices ( P = .013), nasal cannula ( P = .034), nasogastric cannula ( P = .034), presence of edema ( P = .001), infection ( P = .007), higher TISS score ( P = .047), and greater number of medical devices ( P = .022). Survival analysis indicated that a high or very high-risk score on the Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk ( P = .043) and edema ( P = .030) are risk factors for MDRPI occurrences in this vulnerable population. Conclusions: The incidence rate of MDRPIs was 63.6%. The categories with the highest high or very high risk scores on the Braden Scale for Risk of Pressure Pain and Edema emerged as risk factors for MDRPI in this critically ill and vulnerable population.
Laser treatment of vascular skin lesions: which laser: when, why, and how?

G. Keller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/S-2008-1064727

Abstract:
Determining the incidence and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care patients

Kevser Karacabay,Ayşegül Savci,Mehmet Dalkılıç,Filiz Kabu Hergül

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2023.08.002

Abstract:Aim: This study aims to determine the incidence and risk factors of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury (MDRPI) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. Material and methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study involved 300 patients who did not have an MDRPI at the time of admission to the ICU of a university hospital in Turkey. The data was collected using the Patient Information Form, the Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Follow-Up Chart, and the Jackson/Cubbin Risk Assessment Scale. Results: The mean age of the patients was 71.88 ± 14.82 years old. Precisely 31% of patients were found to be at risk for pressure injuries, and MDRPI occurred in 18% of them. It was found that patients most commonly experienced stage 1 MDRPI in the hand-finger region due to pulse oximetry. It was also determined that nasal cannulas caused MDRPI the fastest. Patients with MDRPI had low Jackson/Cubbin scores, low albumin and hematocrit levels, and longer hospitalization durations (p < .05). Dependence on -respiratory support device, bedridden, and experiencing non-device-related pressure injuries were associated with MDRPI (p < .05). Conclusion: It was found that factors causing non-device-related pressure injuries may also pose an MDRPI risk for patients in intensive care. It was also observed that devices used in ICU could cause pressure injuries even in very short periods in cases where necessary precautions are not taken. Periodic evaluation of the area the medical devices are in contact with, removal of unused devices as quickly as possible, and the use of prophylactic dressings can play an important role in preventing MDRPI.
Incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit and related risk factors

Aslıhan Aydım Kudu,Nurten Taşdemir,Münevver Sönmez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2023.06.006

Abstract:Aim: At present, physicians employ medical devices extensively in the treatment of numerous diseases and in the care and follow-up of patients. However, these medical devices are a potential cause of pressure injuries.The study aimed to investigate the incidence and affecting risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) in an adult intensive care unit. Materials and methods: This is a longitudinal descriptive/analytical and cross-sectional study. The researchers conducted this study with 213 intensive care patients between 15.06.2021 and 15.12.2021. The skin and mucosa under and around each medical device were observed once a day for MDRPIs during the stay of patients who had been hospitalized in the intensive care unit for at least 24 h. The data were collected using Patient Information Form developed by the researchers based on the literature, Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Monitoring Form, the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator (Jackson/Cubbin BARHATr)-Turkish Version, the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Pressure Injury Staging System and the Glasgow Coma Scale. Results: The incidence of MDRPIs was 28.6% (61/213). The study revealed that 48.4% (46/95) of these injuries were caused by medical devices for respiratory system, 26.3% (25/95) by devices for gastrointestinal and genitourinary system. The study also revealed that 70.5% of MDRPIs occurred on the skin and 29.5% on the mucosal membrane, and that 82.1% of the MDRPIs occurring on the skin were at Stage 1. In terms of anatomical location, 21.1% of these injuries developed on the fingers and 13.7% on the mouth/lip. In multivariate analysis, parenteral + enteral (p = 0.006, OR = 0.083, 95%CI = [0.014-0.497]) and oral nutrition (p = 0.037, OR = 0.210, 95%CI = [0.049-0.908]), a higher number of devices (nine or more) (p = 0.002, OR = 5.387, 95%CI = [1.840-15.772]) and the duration of device wear (p < 0.05) were identified as independent risk factors for the occurrence of MDRPIs. Conclusions: The study showed that the incidence of MDRPIs was relatively high and was associated with various factors. It is critical for intensive care nurses, who encounter MDRPIs more frequently, to consider these factors while caring for their patients and to take appropriate preventive measures to reduce the incidence of these injuries.
Medical device-related pressure injuries in intensive care patients: A prospective and descriptive study

Bilge Tezcan,Şule Ecevit Alpar,Bilgi Gülseven Karabacak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.03.003

Abstract:Background: Treatment and care of patients in intensive care units require the use of many medical and technological instruments. Pressure injuries occur when medical devices, which are used more in intensive care patients and are in direct or indirect contact with the skin, cause focal and localized forces on the superficial or deep tissues. Objective: In this study, it was aimed to examine the risk factors, incidence and characteristics of medical device-related pressure injuries in intensive care patients. Methods: This study has a prospective and descriptive design. The study was carried out in the adult intensive care unit of a healthcare institution located in the western Turkey. 138 intensive care patients treated in the level 3 adult intensive care unit were enrolled in the study. The first observations and evaluations of intensive care patients in terms of pressure injuries were made within the first 24 h after admission to the clinic. Observations continued daily during the hospitalization period of the patient. Data were collected with the Intensive Care Patient Information Form, Glasgow Coma Scale, Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale and Identification Form for Medical device-related Pressure Ulcers. Analysis of data was performed with descriptive statistical methods, Shapiro-Wilk Test, Mann-Whitney U Test and Chi-Square analysis. Results: Medical device-related pressure injury developed in 11.6% (n = 16) of intensive care patients. Anatomically, pressure injury occurred most frequently on the lip (37.5%) and most frequently due to the intubation tube (37.5%). Most of the developed wounds (75.0%) were found to be stage 2. Multinominal logistic regression analysis, which was performed to determine the effect of independent variables on medical device-related pressure injuries in intensive care patients, was found to be statistically significant (X2 = 37.098, p < 0.001). When the regression coefficients were examined, it was found that total hospitalization time in the intensive care unit (β = 0.948, p < 0.01) and PaCO2 level (β = 0.923, p < 0.01) had a positive, and duration of aerobic respiration with nasal cannula or mask (β = -0.920, p < 0.01) and Braden score (β = -0.948, p < 0.01) had a negative and significant effect on medical device-related pressure injuries. Conclusions: In this study found that the MDRPIs development rate was lower than other studies. It was observed that pressure injuries due to medical devices developed more frequently in patients with longer hospitalization days, higher PaCO2 levels, shorter duration of oxygenated breathing with nasal cannula or mask, and lower Braden scores.
Incidence of and risk factors for self-load-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients: A prospective observational cohort study

Tomoko Shimura,Gojiro Nakagami,Rei Ogawa,Shimpei Ono,Toshiaki Takahashi,Misako Nagata,Kosuke Kashiwabara,Junko Sugama,Hiromi Sanada,Makoto Oe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13022

Abstract:There are two types of pressure injuries: self-load-related pressure injuries (PIs) and medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs), but the differences in risk factors between PIs and MDRPIs have not yet been clarified. If risk factors for PIs and MDRPIs differ, preventive interventions should take this into account. This is a prospective cohort study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs in critically ill patients and to identify corresponding risk factors. The study included 1418 patients who were admitted to the critical care medical center of a single university hospital in Tokyo, Japan, between 1 December 2019 and 31 August 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs. Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse the predictors in both the PI and MDRPI incidence and non-incidence groups. Predictors were based on data from the 0th disease day. The cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs was 4.6/1000 person-days and 3.6/1000 person-days, respectively. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that common risk factors for the occurrence of PIs and MDRPIs were possession of PI on admission, higher blood lactate, blood purification therapy, and positional restriction. The risk factors for PIs only were diabetes mellitus, septic shock, and a lower serum albumin level, while the risk factors for MDRPIs only were the D-dimer level and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation treatment. Therefore, prophylactic interventions need to consider these different risk factors.
Prevalence, severity, and characteristics of medical device related pressure injuries in adult intensive care patients: A prospective observational study

Mohammad Y N Saleh,Eman Ibrahim M Ibrahim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13845

Abstract:This study was intended to determine the characteristics of Medical Related Pressure Injury (MDRPI) in adult intensive care patients. MDRIs are recognized as significant and complex health problems among hospitalized patients. Underestimated true scale of the problem is evident because the systematic clinical evaluation of MDRPI occurrence is not part of routine skin assessment among intensive care patients. A prospective approach was used to obtain data of MDRPIs with two weeks follow up to monitor the prevention and treatment strategies. Participants were 329 adult patients from three large referral and teaching centres in Jordan. Data were collected using a screening form that included demographic and clinical characteristics, and a list of medical devices. The primary outcome for this study was MDRPI and defined as a pressure injury (PI) found on the skin or mucous membrane with a medical device in use at the location of the injury (EPUAP, 2019). The patients with MDRPI were followed up for 2 weeks for prevention and treatment strategies. Prevalence of MDRPI was 5.01% (15/299) with 41 injuries, 27/41 (65.8%) were skin injuries and 14/41(34.2%) were mucosal. Most mucous membrane MDRPIs were at mouth/lips and caused by ET tube and meatal orifice caused by foley catheter. Skin MDRPIs were at the nose and caused by NG tube and hands by peripheral intravenous line and arms caused by blood pressure cuff. Inadequate prevention was provided on daily care as only 177 prevention and treatment interventions were provided over 2 weeks for 15 patients. As a growing problem among Jordanian adults in intensive care, MDRPI required the need for effective prevention. About one-thirds of MDRPIs were mucosal, a finding not previously reported, indicating the need to include mucous membrane assessment with skin assessment when a medical device such as NG and ET tubes or foley catheters are in use. Prevention and treatment interventions provided to patients with MDRPIs were not systematic and based on routine care with no clear guidelines. A consensus has yet to be reached suggesting the need to establish effective prevention strategies for medical device-related pressure injuries. Future research is recommended to follow up MDRPI prevention and treatment strategies among patients in ICU. We suggest to continue studying the prevalence of MDRPIs and monitoring the location, prevention and treatment of both skin and mucosal MDRPIs.
Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in an Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study

Itaricely Istolé Castro de Assis,Jonathan Estevam Dos Santos,Maria Luiza Valadares Sinicio Abib,Luana Furtado Bueno,Manuela de Mendonça Figueirêdo Coelho,Daniel Nogueira Cortez,Juliano Teixeira Moraes

Abstract:Background: Medical devices can cause pressure injuries. Purpose: This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in an intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among adult patients (at least 18 years of age) admitted to an ICU in a referral hospital in Brazil between December 2019 and February 2020. The skin of patients who consented to participate was assessed for the presence of an MDRPI, and the use of all medical devices was noted. Other independent variables (sociodemographic variables, medical history, pressure injury risk factors, medications, and length of hospitalization) were abstracted from the medical records. Bivariate data analysis included Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test; odds ratio and a confidence interval of 95% also were established. Correlation among independent variables and MDRPI was determined using the ρ Spearman correlation test, and a hierarchical binary logistic regression analysis was performed using statistically significant variables from the bivariate analysis. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The 125 study participants ranged in age from 15 to 97 years (mean, 63.02 ± 19.2), 76 (60.8%) were men, and 76 (60.8%) were White. Of the 125 participants, 43 (34%) experienced MDRPI; the total number of MDRPIs was 58 (3 patients had 3 injuries, and 7 patients had 2 injuries). Of those 58 MDRPIs, 46 were stage 1, and 12 were stage 2. Polypharmacy (> 4 medications) was a significant risk factor for MDRPI. Use of a nasal catheter, cord for orotracheal tube fixation, oximeter, intra-abdominal pressure equipment, and indwelling urinary catheter was significantly associated with the presence of MDRPI. Renal and respiratory diseases and the presence of infection were positively related to the presence of MDRPI. Conclusion: Medical device-related pressure injury was prevalent in this patient population. Most of these injuries were stage 1, which suggests that frequent monitoring and device repositioning (when possible) may help prevent more serious injuries. Additional research involving other hospitals in Brazil is needed to increase the understanding of the prevalence and risk factors of MDRPIs in patients in the ICU.
NICOTINIC ACID AND THE GROWTH OF ISOLATED PEA ROOTS.

F. T. Addicott,J. Bonner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.88.2294.577

IF: 56.9

1938-12-16

Science

Abstract:
Factors influencing the severity of medical device‐related pressure injuries: Pressure injury staging comparison

Yeon Kyo Jung,Hyung Min Hahn,Dong Ha Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14147

2023-03-22

International Wound Journal

Abstract:Medical device‐related pressure injuries are receiving increased attention because their social and economic costs are increasing. This study aimed to analyse the stages for each risk factor, and to assess which has a greater impact on severity. We performed a retrospective analysis of 237 patients. Severity was evaluated by pressure injury stages, and the following categories were considered as risk factors: perceptual functioning, malnutrition, reduced mobility, comorbidities, extrinsic factors, medical devices, anatomical areas, and hospital stay. The stages of pressure injury stages were more for vascular access devices than for respiratory devices. The following were related to severity: mental deterioration‐related diseases, mental status, albumin level, haemoglobin level, total cholesterol level, intensive care unit care, days of hospitalisation, and time to develop pressure injuries after admission. Decreased mental status, anaemia, hypoalbuminemia, and low total cholesterol levels were particularly critical. However, factors such as anatomical areas, age, malignancy, diabetes mellitus, diseases related to malnutrition, abnormal body mass index, immobility‐related diseases, physical restraints, and Braden scale scores were not. A different approach to the management of medical device‐related pressure injuries is necessary because they have distinctive characteristics and causative factors than other pressure injury types.

dermatology,surgery
Medical Device-Related Pressure injuries in adult intensive care units

Selda Celik,Feride Taskin Yilmaz,Gulnaz Altas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16516

Abstract:Aim and objective: This study was conducted to examine the development, characteristics, and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in intensive care units (ICU). Background: The number of individuals admitted to ICU increased in the last years all over the world. In parallel with this need, the frequency of the use of life-support and therapeutic medical devices in the ICU also increases. This situation may lead to the development of MDRPI in the ICU and an increase in its prevalence. Method: The study, which was conducted observationally, prospectively and descriptively, included 302 patients who were hospitalised in an ICU within a year. The study was reported according to the STROBE Declaration. Results: It was observed that MDRPI developed in 27.2% of the patients. It was found that MDRPI developed the most in the nose (26.8%) and mouth (15.9%) regions of the patients. It was determined that MDRPI was diagnosed in 28% of the patients within 3-5 days. It was determined that mostly orthopaedic devices (plaster, cervical collar, splint) (62.5%), fasteners (57.1%), non-invasive ventilation/oxygen masks (51.2%) caused the development of MDRPI. It was found that the number of medical devices used was higher, and the number of hospitalisation days in the ICU was also higher, and these factors explained 28.3% of the total variance in the development of MDRPI. Conclusion: It was determined that MDRPI developed in approximately one of four patients in the ICU and that the numbers of medical devices and hospitalisation days were important determinant risk factors. Relevance to clinical practice: The high rate of development of MDRPI is worrying in terms of nursing care quality. It is recommended that nurses recognise risk factors in order to prevent the development of MDRPI, evaluate the suitability, necessity, and safety of the devices to be used is located.
Protocols and their effects for medical device-related pressure injury prevention among critically ill patients: a systematic review

Haeyoung Lee,Seunghye Choi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02080-y

2024-06-17

BMC Nursing

Abstract:Abstract Background A pressure injury refers to localized damage to the skin and/or tissue due to prolonged pressure, and it has recently been defined to include pressure injuries related to medical devices. Medical device-related pressure injuries occur in various sites and are difficult to detect. Even if it is detected, medical devices are essential to life for critically ill patients. Thus, it is difficult to remove or change the position of the medical device; therefore, prevention is essential. This study aims to integrate the literature on medical device-related pressure injury prevention protocols among critically ill patients. Methods The literature inclusion criteria were (1) critically ill patients, (2) device-related pressure injury interventions, (3) randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs, and (4) written in Korean or English. The literature search and selection were performed following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions with the support of the PRISMA Guidelines. Results Twelve articles were finally selected. The incidence of medical device-related pressure injury decreased from 8.1–96.7% before intervention to 0.3–53.3% after intervention, respectively. Medical device-related pressure injury prevention was effective in reducing medical device-related pressure injury incidence when applied to patients of all ages, from neonates to adults, in a variety of intensive care units. Medical device-related pressure injury prevention strategies include nurse education, assessment, documentation, and interventions (hygiene, repositioning, emergent therapy such as protective dressing or designed equipment reducing pressure) of pressure injury. Pressure injury dressings primarily included hydrocolloid foam dressings, but transparent hydrocolloid formulations also effectively reduced medical device-related pressure injury incidence rates. Conclusions In the future, it is necessary to increase the level of evidence by applying specialized medical device-related pressure injury prevention methods for different medical devices and areas of pressure injuries, and verifying their effectiveness. Trial registration The review protocol was registered (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022346450).

nursing
The frequency of pressure injury in level 3 intensive care units and determination of risk factors: A cross-sectional study

Refiye Akpolat,Hamide Sisman,Dudu Alptekin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.03.009

Abstract:Aim: This study was carried out to determine the prevalence of pressure injury and risk factors in patients hospitalized in a university hospital's level 3 intensive care unit. Design: It is a descriptive, prospective, observational type study. Method: The sample of the study consisted of 176 patients aged 18 and over who were admitted to the intensive care units of a University Hospital for at least 24 h. Patient Information Form and Braden Risk Assessment Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale were used to collect data. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 program was used to analyze the data. Results: Presence of chronic disease in the development of pressure injury (22.7%), high-risk patients according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (21%), high-risk patients according to the Braden Risk Assessment Scale (84.2%), low hemoglobin (31%), low albumin levels (32.4%) and duration of stay in the intensive care unit until the day of evaluation were found to be independent risk factors (p < 0.05). The prevalence of pressure injury was determined to be 32.4%, and the rate of pressure injury due to medical devices was 7.4%. Conclusion: Pressure injuries are still common in adult intensive care patients. In terms of patient safety, it is important to give more space to care standards and awareness-raising research and training to prevent pressure injuries.
Influencing factors of pressure injury healing in an acute care setting: A retrospective cohort study

Chanyeong Kwak,Young Ko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2021.11.001

Abstract:Aim: This study aimed to investigate the factors that influence healing during acute care hospitalization by examining the differences in pressure injury (PI) status between admission and discharge. Material and methods: A total of 371 patients who met the study's inclusion criteria were divided into two groups (aggravated or improved) based on the PI status observed at admission and discharge. We used bivariate analyses to compare demographics and clinical factors associated with wound severity and aggravation/improvement of wound condition. Using multiple logistic regression, we identified and examined independent predictors for significant association with aggravation/improvement of the wound status. Results: The prevalence rate of PI at acute hospital admission was 12.5%. By the time of discharge, only 5.4% of PI patients had improved PI, whereas 12.6% had aggravated PI. The significant aggravating factors of PI during acute care hospitalization were the patient's consciousness level, use of foley catheter, creatinine level, and Braden Scale scores (p < .05). Residential place prior to admission were found to be associated with the healing. Conclusions: Nurses providing prophylactic management require close attention to patients who are admitted from long-term facilities to prevent aggravation of PI during acute care hospitalization.
Ambulance referral of more than 2 hours could result in a high prevalence of medical-device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) with characteristics different from some inpatient settings: a descriptive observational study

Zhenyu Luo,Sihui Liu,Linhe Yang,Shuyan Zhong,Lihua Bai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00815-9

2023-04-25

Abstract:Background: Medical device-related pressure injuries(MDRPI) are prevalent and attracting more attention. During ambulance transfer, the shear force caused by braking and acceleration; extensive medical equipment crowed in a narrow space add external risk factors for MDRPIs. However, there is insufficient research on the relationship between MDRPIs and ambulance transfers. This study aims to clarify the prevalence and characteristics of MDRPI during ambulance transfer. Method: A descriptive observational study was conducted with convenience sampling. Before starting the study, six PI specialist nurses certified by the Chinese Nursing Association trained emergency department nurses for three MDRPI and Braden Scale sessions, one hour for each session. Data and images of PIs and MDRPIs are uploaded via the OA system by emergency department nurses and reviewed by these six specialist nurses. The information collection begins on 1 July 2022 and ends on 1 August 2022. Demographic and clinical characteristics and a list of medical devices were collected by emergency nurses using a screening form developed by researchers. Results: One hundred one referrals were eventually included. The mean age of participants was (58.3 ± 11.69) years, predominantly male (67.32%, n = 68), with a mean BMI of 22.48 ± 2.2. The mean referral time among participants was 2.26 ± 0.26 h, the mean BRADEN score was 15.32 ± 2.06, 53.46% (n = 54) of participants were conscious, 73.26% (n = 74) were in the supine position, 23.76% (n = 24) were in the semi-recumbent position, and only 3 (2.9%) were in the lateral position. Eight participants presented with MDRPIs, and all MDRPIs are stage 1. Patients with spinal injuries are most prone to MDRPIs (n = 6). The jaw is the area most prone to MDRPIs, caused by the cervical collar (40%, n = 4), followed by the heel (30%, n = 3) and nose bridge (20%, n = 2) caused by the respiratory devices and spinal board. Conclusion: MDRPIs are more prevalent during long ambulance referrals than in some inpatient settings. The characteristics and related high-risk devices are also different. The prevention of MDRPIs during ambulance referrals deserves more research.
Determination of Incidence and Risk Factors of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in the ICU: A Descriptive Study

Ezgi Dirgar,Neslihan Yağmur Gider,Betül Tosun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/asw.0000000000000113

IF: 2.3729

2024-02-21

Advances in Skin & Wound Care

Abstract:Providers often use advanced technology devices when providing care to patients treated in the ICU. 1,2 Endotracheal tubes, noninvasive ventilation masks, nasogastric (NG) tubes, ties used to fix devices, Foley catheters, and many other devices are integral parts of the treatment and care of critically ill patients. 1,3–5 Although these devices are vital for the patient's survival, they are a risk factor for pressure injury (PI). 6,7 The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel defines medical device-related PIs (MDRPIs) as follows: "They result from the use of devices designed and applied for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. The resulting pressure injury usually matches the model or shape of the device. The injury should be staged using the staging system." 4,5,8–10 However, "Due to the unique anatomy in mucosal membranes, pressure injuries in these tissues should be noted, but can never be staged." 11 Thus, MDRPIs caused by a device or object are different from a PI caused by body weight. 5,12,13 Because of the pressure associated with the medical device, the wound appears on the skin and mucous membranes rather than over a bony area. The localized nature of the device causes a skin disturbance similar to that of the device in shape and distribution and deeper tissue damage in the skin. 4

dermatology,nursing,surgery
Factors affecting the occurrence of pressure injuries among patients receiving targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest

Shinhye Ahn,Minjeong An,Sung-Hee Yoo,Hyunyoung Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2022.03.005

Abstract:Background: Pressure injuries (PIs) are a well-known complication of critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest (CA). However, little is known about the factors that impact the occurrence of PIs among these patients. Objectives: This study aimed to examine factors related to the occurrence of PIs among patients after CA treated with TTM. Methods: This retrospective observational study collected data from 126 patients after CA aged 18 years or older from a single tertiary hospital admitted between January 2017 and December 2019. Demographic, clinical, and medical device-related characteristics were collected by patient chart review. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors related to the occurrence of PIs. Results: The study showed that the incidence of PIs was 31.8%. Patients who were male (odds ratio [OR], 4.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-19.08), developed diarrhoea (OR, 4.90, 95% CI, 1.31-18.41), or were subjected to physical restraint (OR, 6.03; 95% CI, 1.52-23.96) were at a higher risk of developing PIs. A lower risk of developing PIs was associated with the Glasgow Coma Scale score greater than 13 on the third day of admission (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.52), higher haemoglobin level (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86), or low nutritional risk index (≤100) (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.57). Conclusions: Nurses should be aware that patients treated with TTM after CA are at a high risk of developing PIs from the moment of admission and should be closely monitored.

Effects of antianginal therapy on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance: comparison of the response to bepridil, propranolol, and diltiazem.

The Prevalence, Incidence, And Associated Factors Of Pressure Injuries Among Immobile Inpatients: A Multicentre, Cross-Sectional, Exploratory Descriptive Study In China

Incidence, prevalence and risk factors of device-related pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit: A meta-analysis of 10,084 patients from 11 countries

Testicular Cancer.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in Hemodynamically Unstable Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Laser treatment of vascular skin lesions: which laser: when, why, and how?

Determining the incidence and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care patients

Incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit and related risk factors

Medical device-related pressure injuries in intensive care patients: A prospective and descriptive study

Incidence of and risk factors for self-load-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients: A prospective observational cohort study

Prevalence, severity, and characteristics of medical device related pressure injuries in adult intensive care patients: A prospective observational study

Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in an Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study

NICOTINIC ACID AND THE GROWTH OF ISOLATED PEA ROOTS.

Factors influencing the severity of medical device‐related pressure injuries: Pressure injury staging comparison

Medical Device-Related Pressure injuries in adult intensive care units

Protocols and their effects for medical device-related pressure injury prevention among critically ill patients: a systematic review

The frequency of pressure injury in level 3 intensive care units and determination of risk factors: A cross-sectional study

Influencing factors of pressure injury healing in an acute care setting: A retrospective cohort study

Ambulance referral of more than 2 hours could result in a high prevalence of medical-device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) with characteristics different from some inpatient settings: a descriptive observational study

Determination of Incidence and Risk Factors of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in the ICU: A Descriptive Study

Factors affecting the occurrence of pressure injuries among patients receiving targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest