Comparative Yield and Efficiency of Strategies Based on Risk Assessment and Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Analysis
Hongda Chen,Le Wang,Ming Lu,Chen Zhu,Yunfeng Zhu,Weihua Ma,Xinmin Chen,Lingbin Du,Wanqing Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.04.08
2021-01-01
Chinese Journal of Cancer Research
Abstract:Objective: Integration of risk stratification into fecal immunochemical test(FIT) might aid in the suboptimal detection of advanced neoplasms by FIT in colorectal cancer(CRC) screening. A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the participation and diagnostic yield of the parallel combination of questionnaire-based risk assessment(QRA) and FIT, FIT-only and QRA-only strategies in a CRC screening program in China.Methods: The study included 29,626 individuals aged 40-74 years and invited to participate in a CRC screening program in China. Participants were first invited to undertake QRA and one-time FIT(OC-sensor). Participants with positive QRA or FIT were deemed to be high-risk individuals who were recommended for subsequent colonoscopy. Participation, detection rate, and resource demand for colonoscopy were calculated and compared.Results: Of the 29,626 invitees, 20,203 completed the parallel combination, 8,592 completed the QRA-only, and11 completed the FIT-only strategy. For the parallel combination, FIT-only, and QRA-only strategies, the overall positivity rates were 10.2%(2,928/28,806), 5.4%(1,096/20,214), and 6.8%(1,944/28,795), respectively; the yield of advanced neoplasm per 10,000 invitees were 46.9 [95% confidence interval(95% CI): 39.8-55.4], 36.8(95% CI:30.5-44.4), and 12.2(95% CI: 8.8-16.8), respectively; the positive predictive values for detecting advanced neoplasms among participants who completed colonoscopy were 4.7%(95% CI: 4.0%-5.6%), 9.9%(95% CI:8.3%-11.9%), and 1.9%(95% CI: 1.3%-2.6%), respectively; the number of colonoscopies required to detect one advanced neoplasm was 11.4(95% CI: 9.8-13.4), 5.7(95% CI: 4.8-6.7), and 28.4(95% CI: 20.7-39.2),respectively.Conclusions: The parallel combination of QRA and FIT did not show superior efficacy for detecting advanced neoplasm compared with FIT alone in this CRC screening program.