A Ready-to-Use Purified Exosome Product for Volumetric Muscle Loss and Functional Recovery

Lorenzo Mazzucchelli,Aida K Sarcon,Tony C T Huang,Jialun Li,Charlotte E Berry,Matthew T Houdek,Atta Behfar,Chunfeng Zhao,Steven L Moran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2023.0057
Abstract:Large skeletal muscle defects owing to trauma or following tumor extirpation can result in substantial functional impairment. Purified exosomes are now available clinically and have been used for wound healing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the regenerative capacity of commercially available exosomes on an animal model of volumetric muscle loss (VML) and its potential translation to human muscle injury. An established VML rat model was used. In the in vitro experiment, rat myoblasts were isolated and cocultured with 5% purified exosome product (PEP) to validate uptake. Myoblast proliferation and migration was evaluated with increasing concentrations of PEP (2.5%, 5%, and 10%) in comparison with control media (F10) and myoblast growth medium (MGM). In the in vivo experiment, a lateral gastrocnemius-VML defect was made in the rat hindlimb. Animals were randomized into four experimental groups; defects were treated with surgery alone, fibrin sealant, fibrin sealant and PEP, or platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The groups were further randomized into four recovery time points (14, 28, 45, or 90 days). The isometric tetanic force (ITF), which was measured as a percentage of force compared with normal limb, was used for functional evaluation. Florescence microscopy confirmed that 5% PEP demonstrated cellular uptake ∼8-12 h. Compared with the control, myoblasts showed faster proliferation with PEP irrespective of concentration. PEP concentrations of 2.5% and 5% promoted myoblast migration faster compared with the control (<0.05). At 90 days postop, both the PEP and fibrin sealant and PRP groups showed greater ITF compared with control and fibrin sealant alone (<0.05). At 45 days postop, PEP with fibrin sealant had greater cellularity compared with control (<0.05). At 90 days postop, both PEP with fibrin sealant and the PRP-treated groups had greater cellularity compared with fibrin sealant and control (<0.05). PEP promoted myoblast proliferation and migration. When delivered to a wound with a fibrin sealant, PEP allowed for muscle regeneration producing greater functional recovery and more cellularity in vivo compared with untreated animals. PEP may promote muscle regeneration in cases of VML; further research is warranted to evaluate PEP for the treatment of clinical muscle defects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?