Immunohistochemical localization of transferrin receptors in junctional and sulcular epithelium of human gingiva.

J. Salonen,M. Kallajoki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(86)90155-X

IF: 2.64

Archives of Oral Biology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The characteristics and clinical outcomes of trauma patients transferred by a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service in Korea: a retrospective study

Myung Jin Jang,Woo Sung Choi,Jung Nam Lee,Won Bin Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2023.0074

Abstract:Purpose: Helicopter transport with medical teams has been proven to be effective, with improvements in patient survival rates. This study compared and analyzed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of trauma patients transported by doctor helicopters according to whether patients were transferred after a clinical evaluation or without a clinical evaluation. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed data from the Korean Trauma Data Bank of trauma patients who arrived at a regional trauma center through doctor helicopters from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: doctor helicopter transport before evaluation (DHTBE) and doctor helicopter transport after evaluation (DHTAE). These groups were compared. Results: The study population included 351 cases. At the time of arrival at the trauma center, the systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the DHTAE group than in the DHTBE group (P=0.018). The Injury Severity Score was significantly higher in the DHTAE group (P<0.001), and the accident to trauma center arrival time was significantly shorter in the DHTBE group (P<0.001). Mortality did not show a statistically significant between-group difference (P=0.094). Surgical cases in the DHTAE group had a longer time from the accident scene to trauma center arrival (P=0.002). The time from the accident to the operation room or from the accident to angioembolization showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: DHTAE was associated with significantly longer transport times to the trauma center, as well as nonstatistically significant trends for delays in receiving surgery and procedures, as well as higher mortality. If severe trauma is suspected, air transport to a trauma center should be requested immediately after a simple screening test (e.g., mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, or Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma), which may help reduce the time to definitive treatment.
Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: Limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in cocaine-saline discrimination

F. Colpaert,P. Janssen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(82)90178-2

IF: 5.273

1982-11-01

Neuropharmacology

Abstract:
Purification and properties of adenyl cyclase from Streptococcus salivarius.

R. Khandelwal,I. R. Hamilton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)62227-6

IF: 5.485

1971-05-25

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract:
Geospatial assessment of helicopter emergency medical service overtriage

Andrew-Paul Deeb,Heather M Phelos,Andrew B Peitzman,Timothy R Billiar,Jason L Sperry,Joshua B Brown

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003122

2021-07-01

Abstract:Background: Despite evidence of benefit after injury, helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) overtriage remains high. Scene and transfer overtriage are distinct processes. Our objectives were to identify geographic variation in overtriage and patient-level predictors, and determine if overtriage impacts population-level outcomes. Methods: Patients 16 years or older undergoing scene or interfacility HEMS in the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study were included. Overtriage was defined as discharge within 24 hours of arrival. Patients were mapped to zip code, and rates of overtriage were calculated. Hot spot analysis identified regions of high and low overtriage. Mixed-effects logistic regression determined patient predictors of overtriage. High and low overtriage regions were compared for population-level injury fatality rates. Analyses were performed for scene and transfer patients separately. Results: A total of 85,572 patients were included (37.4% transfers). Overtriage was 5.5% among scene and 11.8% among transfer HEMS (p < 0.01). Hot spot analysis demonstrated geographic variation in high and low overtriage for scene and transfer patients. For scene patients, overtriage was associated with distance (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.06 per 10 miles; p = 0.04), neck injury (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.60; p = 0.04), and single-system injury (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.15-1.64; p < 0.01). For transfer patients, overtriage was associated with rurality (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.22-2.21; p < 0.01), facial injury (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03-1.44; p = 0.02), and single-system injury (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-2.19; p < 0.01). For scene patients, high overtriage was associated with higher injury fatality rate (coefficient, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.68-1.76; p < 0.01); low overtriage was associated with lower injury fatality rate (coefficient, -0.73; 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.68; p < 0.01). For transfer patients, high overtriage was not associated with injury fatality rate (p = 0.53); low overtriage was associated with lower injury fatality rate (coefficient, -2.87; 95% CI, -4.59 to -1.16; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Geographic overtriage rates vary significantly for scene and transfer HEMS, and are associated with population-level outcomes. These findings can help guide targeted performance improvement initiatives to reduce HEMS overtriage. Level of evidence: Therapeutic, level IV.
Which Method of Transportation Is Associated With Better Outcomes for Patients With Firearm Injuries to the Head and Neck?

Dina Amin,Andrew J Manhan,Ezra Pak-Harvey,Steven M Roser,Randi N Smith,Shelly Abramowicz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2023.07.136

Abstract:Background: In firearm injuries (FI), rapid transportation is important for survival. Information regarding different methods of transportation for head and neck FI is limited. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to measure the association between method of transportation and the need for tracheostomy and/or intensive care unit (ICU). Study design, setting, sample: This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed patients in Trauma Registry at Grady Memorial Hospital (GMH) in Atlanta, Georgia, from January 2016 to June 2021. Patients ≥18 years old who sustained FI to the head and neck and were transported via ground emergency medical services (GEMS) or helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) were included. Patients who arrived at the hospital by foot, private vehicle, or transported from a different hospital were excluded. Predictor/exposure/independent variable: The primary predictor variable was method of transportation (GEMS: ambulance transportation to GMH vs HEMS: helicopter transportation to GMH helipad). Main outcome variable(s): The primary outcome variables were tracheostomy (yes/no) and ICU admission (yes/no). Covariates: Patient, injury, and hospital-related covariates were collected. Analyses: Univariate analysis, χ2 test for categorical variables, and independent t test for continuous variables were calculated. Statistical significance was P < .05. Results: Of total, 609 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 560 patients (483 males) with a mean age of 33.6 years old (range, 18 to 90) transported by GEMS. There were 49 patients (40 males) with a mean age of 44 years old (range, 18 to 82) transported by HEMS. Patients transported by HEMS were statistically more likely to have longer transportation time in minutes [13.2 (range, 5 to 132) versus 24.2 (range, 9 to 46), P= <.001], lower Glasgow Coma Scale score [9.9 (range, 3 to 15) versus 6.3 (range, 3 to 15); P= <.001], higher Injury Severity Score [19.3 (range, 3.7 to 98) versus 24.2 (range, 10.3 to 98); P = .007], require transfusion [195 (34.8%); versus 26 (53.1%); P = .013], tracheostomy [46(8.2%) versus 13 (26.5%); P = <.001], and/or admitted to ICU [169, 30.2% versus 24 (49%); P = .007]. Conclusion and relevance: HEMS was positively associated with more tracheostomy and/or ICU admission. Additionally, patients transported by HEMS experienced longer transportation time and severe injuries. HEMS triage criteria specific for FI to the head and neck should be developed.
Impact of a ground intermediate transport from the helicopter landing site at a hospital on transport duration and patient safety

Dominik J. Hoechter,Bjarne Schmalbach,Merve Schmidt,Stephan Prueckner,Andreas Bayer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01124-7

2023-10-27

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Helicopter emergency medical service provides timely care and rapid transport of severely injured or critically ill patients. Due to constructional or regulatory provisions at some hospitals, a remote helicopter landing site necessitates an intermediate ground transport to the emergency department by ambulance which might lengthen patient transport time and comprises the risk of disconnection or loss of vascular access lines, breathing tubes or impairment of other relevant equipment during the loading processes. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a ground intermediate transport at the hospital site prolonged patient transport times and operating times or increases complication rates.

emergency medicine
Identifying trauma patients with benefit from direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers

Charlie A. Sewalt,Benjamin Y. Gravesteijn,Daan Nieboer,Ewout W. Steyerberg,Dennis Den Hartog,David Van Klaveren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00487-3

2021-08-06

BMC Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Abstract Background Prehospital triage protocols typically try to select patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) above 15 for direct transportation to a Level-1 trauma center. However, ISS does not necessarily discriminate between patients who benefit from immediate care at Level-1 trauma centers. The aim of this study was to assess which patients benefit from direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers. Methods We used the American National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), a retrospective observational cohort. All adult patients (ISS > 3) between 2015 and 2016 were included. Patients who were self-presenting or had isolated limb injury were excluded. We used logistic regression to assess the association of direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers with in-hospital mortality adjusted for clinically relevant confounders. We used this model to define benefit as predicted probability of mortality associated with transportation to a non-Level-1 trauma center minus predicted probability associated with transportation to a Level-1 trauma center. We used a threshold of 1% as absolute benefit. Potential interaction terms with transportation to Level-1 trauma centers were included in a penalized logistic regression model to study which patients benefit. Results We included 388,845 trauma patients from 232 Level-1 centers and 429 Level-2/3 centers. A small beneficial effect was found for direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers (adjusted Odds Ratio: 0.96, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.92–0.99) which disappeared when comparing Level-1 and 2 versus Level-3 trauma centers. In the risk approach, predicted benefit ranged between 0 and 1%. When allowing for interactions, 7% of the patients ( n = 27,753) had more than 1% absolute benefit from direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers. These patients had higher AIS Head and Thorax scores, lower GCS and lower SBP. A quarter of the patients with ISS > 15 were predicted to benefit from transportation to Level-1 centers ( n = 26,522, 22%). Conclusions Benefit of transportation to a Level-1 trauma centers is quite heterogeneous across patients and the difference between Level-1 and Level-2 trauma centers is small. In particular, patients with head injury and signs of shock may benefit from care in a Level-1 trauma center. Future prehospital triage models should incorporate more complete risk profiles.

emergency medicine
Characteristics of trauma patients treated by Helicopter Emergency Medical Service and transported to the hospital by helicopter or ambulance

Bas Blok,Cor Slagt,Geert-Jan van Geffen,Rebecca Koch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01088-6

2024-09-28

BMC Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Trauma patients treated by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) can be transported to the hospital either by helicopter or by ambulance, in both cases accompanied by the HEMS physician. The objectives of this study are first to compile an overview of patients treated and transported by the HEMS team with either the helicopter (patients transported by helicopter, PTH) or with the ambulance (patients transported by ambulance, PTA). In addition, to evaluate whether the existing information systems obtain relevant data for researching the decision-making process. The second objective is to identify potentially influencing factors that could be significant for further research.

emergency medicine
Minerals, coronary heart disease and sudden coronary death.

H. Karppanen,R. Pennanen,L. Passinen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000402000

Abstract:
Does destination make a difference? Outcomes after a policy change affecting cutoff times for pre-hospital transport

Elizabeth Renaud,Olivia Cummings,Melissa Vanover,Joshua Ray Tanzer,Andrew McCarthy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000004245

2024-01-11

Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

Abstract:Facilitating primary triage and care at Pediatric Trauma Centers (PTCs) can improve outcomes for children after trauma. However, scene location and regional EMS regulations may result in initial evaluation occurring at non-pediatric facilities with later transportation to PTCs for definitive care. In this study, we assessed the results of a change in transport time cutoff from 30 to 45 minutes on pediatric patient outcomes.

surgery,critical care medicine
[Findings of general methodology for the study of the mechanical activity of the intestine].

A. Torsoli

Abstract:
Impact of Surgical Team Involvement at the Time of Trauma Activation for Pediatric Patients With Motorized Cycle or All-Terrain Vehicle Injury Mechanism

Katherine Bergus,Shruthi Srinivas,Celia Ligorski,Sydney Castellanos,Rajan Thakkar,Dana Schwartz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003261

2024-08-23

Abstract:Objectives: At our institution, level 2 trauma (L2T) activations are primarily managed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, whereas level 1 activations are co-managed by pediatric surgery and PEM. Starting in September 2019, the response to L2T activations due to all-terrain vehicles or motorized cycles (ATVs/MCs) changed to include surgical assessment upon patient arrival due to increased likelihood of significant injuries and need for higher level of care. The impact of PEM/surgery co-management of ATV/MC L2T patients on time to an admission decision is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients <18 years of age presenting to our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 pediatric trauma center as L2T activations with ATV/MC mechanism between 1/2016 and 10/2022. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, details of imaging, interventions, and emergency department (ED) course were recorded. The χ2 and Fisher exact tests were performed. Results: One hundred fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria prior to augmenting our response to include surgical presence at L2T-ATV/MC activations, and 216 patients were treated after our protocol change. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, race, transfer status, vehicle subtype, or Injury Severity Scores between groups. Trauma surgery was involved in the care of 74.8% of L2T-ATV/MC patients before protocol augmentation and 87% after (P = 0.003). Time to an admission decision significantly decreased by 22.5 minutes (117 minutes [interquartile range, 72-178] vs 94.5 minutes [interquartile range, 60-139]; P = 0.023) after protocol augmentation. There was a trend toward increased completion of mandated postsecondary survey communication huddles after protocol change (84.6% to 91.2%, P = 0.089). The median total ED length of stay did not differ between admitted and discharged patients. Conclusions: Early surgical assessment for pediatric patients with ATV/MC injuries improved time to an admission decision and trauma communication huddle compliance. Next steps include identifying process improvement opportunities to decrease ED total length of stay for patients with ATV/MC injuries.
Cancer patient care in clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: what does it cost?

M. Brown

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/JNCI/91.10.818

1999-05-19

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract:“What does it cost?” This has been the refrain reiterated with increasing intensity over the last decade on the issue of financial coverage of patient care for patient’s enrolled in clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). In the past, the answer to this question, to the frustration of health care payers and providers, has been, “We don’t know.” In recent years, the financial coverage of patient care in clinical trials has become an urgent question because implicit subsidies available for support of clinical research in the past have been suppressed by various measures aimed at achieving global health care cost containment (1). The NCI, through its Office of Clinical Research Promotion, has been in the forefront of addressing this problem by negotiating agreements in principle and in practice with such organizations as Medicare and the American Association of Health Plans for coverage of patient care in clinical trials sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (2). Legislation mandating coverage of patient care costs for specific cancer clinical trials has been enacted in Maryland, Rhode Island, and Georgia (3) and is under consideration in several other states. A similar mandate is also under consideration at the federal level as part of the proposed Patient’s Bill of Rights Act of 1998 (4). These proposals must be “costed out,” by such agencies at the Congressional Budget Office (5) as they are considered, and many of these proposals and agreements contain requirements for continued evaluation of the economic impact of clinical trial coverage as the programs go into effect (4–6). Until now, the entities responsible for “costing out” the financial impact of coverage proposals have had to operate in the absence of empiric information. Because predicting financial exposure into the future is always risky business, these analyses have tended to err on the high side. Now, with the data provided by Wagner et al. (7) in this issue of the Journal, it will be possible to begin to place more realistic and, as it turns out, lower ceilings on these estimates. What can we learn from this study? Wagner et al. (7) examined the patient care cost of 61 cancer patients enrolled in NCI-sponsored phase II or phase III clinical trials at the Mayo Clinic from 1988 through 1994 and compared these costs with the 61 “control” patients receiving standard care in Olmsted County, MN. The 61 control patients were carefully pairmatched with the clinical trial patients on the basis of age, sex, site of primary cancer, stage of cancer, date of diagnosis, and clinical trial eligibility. Total cumulative medical care costs, for each case and control patient, were tracked at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after the date of diagnosis. In the analysis of 5-year cumulative costs, statistical methods were used that take the effects of censoring into account. The study found that trial participants experienced only slightly higher costs compared with control patients and that this difference was not statistically significant. At 1 year after diagnosis, the average cost for trial enrollees was $24 645 compared with $23 964 for comparable patients receiving standard care. The respective costs at 5 years were $46 424 and $44 133. These results should be considered preliminary because of the small size of this study and the notoriously high variance of medical cost data (8), as can be seen in Fig. 1 of Wagner et al. (7). Nevertheless, the results of this study and other preliminary work presented at a NCI-sponsored symposium in July 1998 (9) strongly suggest that, until more definitive
Variations in pediatric trauma transfer patterns in Northern California pediatric trauma centers (2001-2009)

Lara D Vogel,Hurnan Vongsachang,Elizabeth Pirrotta,James F Holmes,John Sherck,Christopher Newton,Peter D'Souza,David A Spain,N Ewen Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12463

Abstract:Background: Due to the scarcity of specialized resources for pediatric trauma, "regionalization," or a system designed to get "the right child, to the right place, at the right time," is vital to quality pediatric trauma care. In Northern California, four pediatric trauma centers serve 3.9 million children within a geographically diverse area of 113,630 square miles. A significant proportion of children with trauma is initially triaged to nontrauma hospitals and may require subsequent transfer to a specialty center. Trauma transfer patterns to a pediatric trauma center may provide insight into regional primary triage practices. Transfers from hospitals in close proximity to pediatric trauma centers might suggest that some children could have avoided transfer with minimal additional transport time. While pediatric trauma centers are scarce and serve as regional resources, transfers from beyond the regular catchment area of a trauma center could be an indication of clinical need. Objectives: The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of patterns of pediatric trauma transfer to all pediatric trauma centers within the region as a first step in assessing the efficacy and efficiency of trauma triage. The authors examined three groups of transfer patients: transfers from within the same county as the pediatric trauma center (near transfers), transfers from counties adjacent to the pediatric trauma center (catchment transfers), and transfers from more distant counties (far transfers). The hypothesis was that catchment transfers would form the bulk of transfers, near transfers would compose < 10% of total transfers, and far transfers would be younger and more severely injured than catchment transfers. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of institutional trauma registry data of children < 18 years from all pediatric trauma centers in Northern California from 2001 through 2009. Transfers were characterized by the location of the transfer hospital relative to the location of the pediatric trauma center. Characteristics associated with near transfer compared to primary triage to a pediatric trauma center were identified, as well as characteristics associated with far transfer compared to catchment transfer. Results: A total of 2,852 of 11,952 (23.9%) pediatric trauma patients were transfers. Near transfers comprised 24.5% of cases, catchment transfers were 37.4%, and far transfers were 38.2%. After controlling for demographic, clinical, and geographic factors, younger age, higher Injury Severity Score (ISS), public versus private insurance, and an injury mechanism of "fall" were associated with near transfer rather than direct triage. Older age, higher ISS, and mechanism of "motor vehicle crash" were associated with far rather than catchment transfer. Conclusions: This analysis of patterns of transfer to all pediatric trauma centers within Northern California gives the most comprehensive population view of pediatric trauma triage to date, to the authors' knowledge. Trauma transfers comprise an important minority of patients cared for at pediatric trauma centers. The number of near transfers documented indicates the potential to improve the primary triage process of patients to pediatric trauma centers. The frequency of far transfers substantiates the well-known shortage of pediatric trauma expertise. Development of regionwide standardized transfer protocols and agreements between hospitals, as well as standardized monitoring of the process and outcomes, could increase efficiency of care.
Computer Algebra Methods in Tropical Geometry

Thomas Markwig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15582-6_37

2010-09-13

Abstract:
Pixel-Based Invariant Feature Extraction and its Application to Radiometric Co-Registration for Multi-Temporal High-Resolution Satellite Imagery

Yonghong Li,C. Davis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2010.2062490

IF: 4.715

2011-06-01

IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Abstract:Here we present a robust fully automated method for relative radiometric co-registration. First, a new low dimensional feature-point descriptor, called the Expanded Haar-Like Filter (EHLF) descriptor, is introduced. The EHLF has many desirable properties like flexible design, fast computation, and multi-scale description, while also being insensitive to variations in image quality. Next, two spatial matching schemes are proposed for increasing the percentage of correctly matched feature points. The first is based on a global affine model and the second utilizes dynamic local template fuzzy distance matching. Finally, precise pixel-to-pixel invariant feature points are extracted from a diversity of image locations centered at matched local extrema points. Experimental results show that for high-resolution multi-temporal imagery, the EHLF descriptor can obtain matched feature points with accuracies equivalent to that using a higher dimensional descriptor. In addition, the EHLF descriptor produces a larger number of correctly matched feature points. The spatial matching methods significantly improve feature-point matching, especially for image pairs with large geometric distortions. Radiometric co-registration quality based on the pixel-based invariant features was tested using four different evaluation datasets, and the results demonstrate that the proposed approach produces the lowest normalized root-mean-square error compared with six other automated methods. The proposed method depends on successful extraction of feature points, which may not be available for the scenes that are fully undeveloped (e.g., forest areas). Nonetheless, Monte Carlo simulations show that 30 to 50 correctly matched feature points will provide relatively stable radiometric calibration coefficients.
Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Transported by Critical Care Air Transport Teams: The Influence of Altitude and Oxygenation during Transport

Joseph K Maddry,Allyson A Araña,Lauren K Reeves,Alejandra G Mora,Xandria E Gutierrez,Crystal A Perez,Patrick C Ng,Sean A Griffiths,Vikhyat S Bebarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaa124

2020-09-18

Abstract:Introduction: Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are life-threatening, and air transport of patients with TBI requires additional considerations. To mitigate the risks of complications associated with altitude, some patients fly with a cabin altitude restriction (CAR) to limit the altitude at which an aircraft's cabin is maintained. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of CARs on patients with TBI transported out of theater via Critical Care Air Transport Teams. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with moderate-to-severe TBI evacuated out of combat theater to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center via Critical Care Air Transport Teams. We collected demographics, flight and injury information, procedures, oxygenation, and outcomes (discharge disposition and hospital/ICU/ventilator days). We categorized patients as having a CAR if they had a documented CAR or maximum cabin altitude of 5,000 feet or lower in their Critical Care Air Transport Teams record. We calculated descriptive statistics and constructed regression models to evaluate the association between CAR and clinical outcomes. Results: We reviewed the charts of 435 patients, 31% of which had a documented CAR. Nineteen percent of the sample had a PaO2 lower than 80 mm Hg, and 3% of patients experienced a SpO2 lower than 93% while in flight. When comparing preflight and in-flight events, we found that the percentage of patients who had a SpO2 of 93% or lower increased for the No CAR group, whereas the CAR group did not experience a significant change. However, flying without a CAR was not associated with discharge disposition, mortality, or hospital/ICU/ventilator days. Further, having a CAR was not associated with these outcomes after adjusting for additional flights, injury severity, injury type, or preflight head surgery. Conclusions: Patients with TBI who flew with a CAR did not differ in clinical outcomes from those without a CAR.
Minimally invasive robotically assisted repair of atrial perforation from a pacemaker lead

S. Hussain,C. Adams,A. Mechulan,P. Leong‐Sit,B. Kiaii

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.459

2012-06-01

Abstract:We present the first reported case of robotic‐assisted right atrial perforation repair and pacemaker lead extraction.
Association of Transport Time, Proximity, and Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness With Pediatric Survival at US Trauma Centers

Nina E Glass,Apoorva Salvi,Ran Wei,Amber Lin,Susan Malveau,Jennifer N B Cook,N Clay Mann,Randall S Burd,Peter C Jenkins,Matthew Hansen,Nicholas M Mohr,Caroline Stephens,Mary E Fallat,E Brooke Lerner,Brendan G Carr,Stephen P Wall,Craig D Newgard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3344

2023-10-01

Abstract:Importance: Emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness is associated with improved survival among children. However, the association between geographic access to high-readiness EDs in US trauma centers and mortality is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association between the proximity of injury location to receiving trauma centers, including the level of ED pediatric readiness, and mortality among injured children. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used a standardized risk-adjustment model to evaluate the association between trauma center proximity, ED pediatric readiness, and in-hospital survival. There were 765 trauma centers (level I-V, adult and pediatric) that contributed data to the National Trauma Data Bank (January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017) and completed the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Assessment (conducted from January 1 through August 31, 2013). The study comprised children aged younger than 18 years who were transported by ground to the included trauma centers. Data analysis was performed between January 1 and March 31, 2022. Exposures: Trauma center proximity within 30 minutes by ground transport and ED pediatric readiness, as measured by weighted pediatric readiness score (wPRS; range, 0-100; quartiles 1 [low readiness] to 4 [high readiness]). Main outcomes and measures: In-hospital mortality. We used a patient-level mixed-effects logistic regression model to evaluate the association of transport time, proximity, and ED pediatric readiness on mortality. Results: This study included 212 689 injured children seen at 765 trauma centers. The median patient age was 10 (IQR, 4-15) years, 136 538 (64.2%) were male, and 127 885 (60.1%) were White. A total of 4156 children (2.0%) died during their hospital stay. The median wPRS at these hospitals was 79.1 (IQR, 62.9-92.7). A total of 105 871 children (49.8%) were transported to trauma centers with high-readiness EDs (wPRS quartile 4) and another 36 330 children (33.7%) were injured within 30 minutes of a quartile 4 ED. After adjustment for confounders, proximity, and transport time, high ED pediatric readiness was associated with lower mortality (highest-readiness vs lowest-readiness EDs by wPRS quartiles: adjusted odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.47-0.89]). The survival benefit of high-readiness EDs persisted for transport times up to 45 minutes. The findings suggest that matching children to trauma centers with high-readiness EDs within 30 minutes of the injury location may have potentially saved 468 lives (95% CI, 460-476 lives), but increasing all trauma centers to high ED pediatric readiness may have potentially saved 1655 lives (95% CI, 1647-1664 lives). Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that trauma centers with high ED pediatric readiness had lower mortality after considering transport time and proximity. Improving ED pediatric readiness among all trauma centers, rather than selective transport to trauma centers with high ED readiness, had the largest association with pediatric survival. Thus, increased pediatric readiness at all US trauma centers may substantially improve patient outcomes after trauma.
Assessing the Impact of Transport Modality on Prehospital Times for Victims of Motorcycle Road Traffic Collisions in the Scottish Highlands

Michael Critchell,Tom Mallinson,Luke Regan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2023.05.008

Abstract:Objective: Dispersed population, mountainous topography, and extreme weather present logistical challenges for the emergency services providing care to the resident population and tourists visiting the Scottish Highlands. Debate over the value of air ambulances has left uncertainty over when they benefit patients and when their use may inadvertently prolong transfer times in rural settings. The primary objective of this study was to find a provisional threshold at which air ambulances are likely to improve time from injury to arrival at the emergency department for this rural patient cohort using motorcycle road traffic collisions as a single trauma etiology. Methods: A retrospective search of Scottish Trauma Audit Group data was undertaken within the time frame of January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020, inclusive to identify adult motorcyclists who had sustained traumatic injuries on highland roads resulting in a transfer to the single trauma unit located within the territorial health board of NHS Highland. For inclusion to the Scottish Trauma Audit Group audit, injuries sustained had resulted in a hospital stay of 3 or more days or death with an Injury Severity Score calculated post-computed tomography/operating room diagnosis. The method of arrival to the hospital was categorized as 1 of the following: road ambulance only, road ambulance (+ prehospital doctor), any involvement of air resources, or self-presentation to hospital. Results: Forty-two cases were identified. The mean on-scene times were longer for patients who were transported by air by 43 minutes. Within an isochrone of 77 minutes (road transfer time) around Raigmore Hospital in Inverness, transfer by land ambulance was faster than air. The majority of patients received definitive care at Raigmore Hospital and did not require further onward transfer. Conclusion: For adult motorcyclists with traumatic injuries in the Highlands, helicopter transfer appears to reduce transport times when the estimated journey to the trauma unit by land is greater than 77 minutes or approximately 49 miles. Patients injured closer to the hospital should be transferred by land to achieve an earlier arrival time. On-scene times were shorter for patients conveyed by land rather than helicopter, and the presence of a physician during the prehospital phase did not prolong on-scene time.

Immunohistochemical localization of transferrin receptors in junctional and sulcular epithelium of human gingiva.

The characteristics and clinical outcomes of trauma patients transferred by a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service in Korea: a retrospective study

Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: Limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in cocaine-saline discrimination

Purification and properties of adenyl cyclase from Streptococcus salivarius.

Geospatial assessment of helicopter emergency medical service overtriage

Which Method of Transportation Is Associated With Better Outcomes for Patients With Firearm Injuries to the Head and Neck?

Impact of a ground intermediate transport from the helicopter landing site at a hospital on transport duration and patient safety

Identifying trauma patients with benefit from direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers

Characteristics of trauma patients treated by Helicopter Emergency Medical Service and transported to the hospital by helicopter or ambulance

Minerals, coronary heart disease and sudden coronary death.

Does destination make a difference? Outcomes after a policy change affecting cutoff times for pre-hospital transport

[Findings of general methodology for the study of the mechanical activity of the intestine].

Impact of Surgical Team Involvement at the Time of Trauma Activation for Pediatric Patients With Motorized Cycle or All-Terrain Vehicle Injury Mechanism

Cancer patient care in clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: what does it cost?

Variations in pediatric trauma transfer patterns in Northern California pediatric trauma centers (2001-2009)

Computer Algebra Methods in Tropical Geometry

Pixel-Based Invariant Feature Extraction and its Application to Radiometric Co-Registration for Multi-Temporal High-Resolution Satellite Imagery

Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Transported by Critical Care Air Transport Teams: The Influence of Altitude and Oxygenation during Transport

Minimally invasive robotically assisted repair of atrial perforation from a pacemaker lead

Association of Transport Time, Proximity, and Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness With Pediatric Survival at US Trauma Centers

Assessing the Impact of Transport Modality on Prehospital Times for Victims of Motorcycle Road Traffic Collisions in the Scottish Highlands