The effect of slow deep breathing relaxation exercise on pain levels during and post chest tube removal after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Mohamad I. Jarrah,Issa M. Hweidi,Sirin A. Al-Dolat,Hossam N. Alhawatmeh,Salwa M. Al-Obeisat,Lama I. Hweidi,Aysam I. Hweidi,Osama A. Alkouri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.03.001
2022-04-01
International Journal of Nursing Sciences
Abstract:ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of slow deep breathing relaxation exercise (SDBRE) in reducing patients' pain levels during chest tube removal (CTR) post coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeryMethodsIn 2019, fifty post-CABG patients conveniently selected from a cardiac intensive care unit in a major referral heart institute in Jordan. The patients were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. A total of 25 patients assigned into the experimental group who received slow deep breathing relaxation Exercise (SDBRE) alongside the conventional care before CTR. The remaining 25 patients constituted the control group (50%) that had CTR following conventional care. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure the participants' pain levels during three phases: before CTR, 5-minutes post CTR, and 15-minutes post CTR to compare the intervention effect between the two groups.ResultsThe intervention group had significantly lower pain levels than the control group at Time 2 [3.50 (1.20, 5.30) vs. 7.90 (7.00,9.00), P < 0.001] and Time 3 [0.00 (0.00, 1.30) vs. 3.60 (2.40, 4.10) P < 0.001]. A Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test was used to compare the patient groups on their measured pain level at each time point. The results showed that pre-intervention basal pain level between the two groups was not statistically significant (Z = −1.33, P = 0.18). However, patients in the control group experienced a decline in pain level immediately following CTR. Meanwhile, patients who received breathing relaxation therapy experienced a fast significant decline in pain level (Z = 5,22, P = 0.001; Z = 5.18, P = 0.001), across the two time points (time 2 & time 3), respectively. The Kruskall-Wallis test was used to compare the pain levels at the three time points for the two groups of patients separately. The data analysis findings for the control and intervention group of patients showed that there was a statistically significant decline in their pain level across time for both groups (Z = 32.71, p < 0.001; Z = 47.23, p < 0.001) respectively.ConclusionsUsing SDBRE during CTR is an effective technique for reducing pain, can minimize the need for analgesics and their associated adverse effects.
nursing