Abstract:Importance: Patient education materials (PEMs) can promote patient engagement, satisfaction, and treatment adherence. The American Medical Association recommends that PEMs be developed for a sixth-grade or lower reading level. Health literacy (HL) refers to an individual's ability to seek, understand, and use health information to make appropriate decisions regarding their health. Patients with suboptimal HL may not be able to understand or act on health information and are at risk for adverse health outcomes. Objective: To assess the readability of PEMs on head and neck cancer (HNC) and to evaluate HL among patients with HNC. Evidence review: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus for peer-reviewed studies published from 1995 to 2024 using the keywords head and neck cancer, readability, health literacy, and related synonyms. Full-text studies in English that evaluated readability and/or HL measures were included. Readability assessments included the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL grade, 0-20, with higher grades indicating greater reading difficulty) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE score, 1-100, with higher scores indicating easier readability), among others. Reviews, conference materials, opinion letters, and guidelines were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Findings: Of the 3235 studies identified, 17 studies assessing the readability of 1124 HNC PEMs produced by professional societies, hospitals, and others were included. The mean FKGL grade ranged from 8.8 to 14.8; none of the studies reported a mean FKGL of grade 6 or lower. Eight studies assessed HL and found inadequate HL prevalence ranging from 11.9% to 47.0%. Conclusions and relevance: These findings indicate that more than one-third of patients with HNC demonstrate inadequate HL, yet none of the PEMs assessed were developed for a sixth grade or lower reading level, as recommended by the American Medical Association. This incongruence highlights the need to address the readability of HNC PEMs to improve patient understanding of the disease and to mitigate potential barriers to shared decision-making for patients with HNC. It is crucial to acknowledge the responsibility of health care professionals to produce and promote more effective PEMs to dismantle the potentially preventable literacy barriers.

Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources Related to Neophallus Reconstruction

Assessing the Readability of Online English and Spanish Language Patient Education Resources Provided by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, and American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgeons

Assessing the Readability of Online English and Spanish Resources for Polydactyly and Syndactyly

Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery

Readability of Online Spanish Materials for Breast Reconstruction Using Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps

"Lost in Translation: The Readability Discrepancy of Online Patient Educational Materials for PCL Surgery"

Evaluating the Readability, Credibility, and Quality of Spanish-Language Online Educational Resources for Knee Arthroplasty: Implications for Patient Education and Health Disparities

Readability Assessment of Patient Education Materials on Uro-oncological Diseases Using Automated Measures

Evaluating the Readability of Patient Education Materials for Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering, Distraction-Based Methods, and Posterior Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Pediatric Spinal Deformity

The Readability of Ophthalmological Patient Education Materials Provided by Major Academic Hospitals

Readability of Patient Education Materials in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review

Assessing the Readability of English and Spanish Online Patient Educational Materials for Deep Venous Thrombosis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of English language online patient education materials in breast cancer: Is readability the only story?

Not So Patient‐Friendly: Patient Education Materials in Rheumatology and Internal Medicine Fall Short of Nationally Recommended Readability Benchmarks in the United States

Navigating Scar Care: An Evaluation of Scar Treatment Patient Education Materials

Quantitative analysis of the level of readability of online emergency radiology-based patient education resources

Expanding Accessibility in Cleft Care: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Literacy of Alveolar Bone Grafting Information

Enhancing the Radiologist-Patient Relationship through Improved Communication: A Quantitative Readability Analysis in Spine Radiology

Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability

A Bilingual Readability Assessment of Online Breast Cancer Screening and Treatment Information

Evaluation of readability levels of online patient education materials for female pelvic floor disorders