Ketamine vs Electroconvulsive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

PhD Fernando Goes,PhDGerardSanacora,MDIrvingReti,MDRobertOstroff,MDKathyWolski,MD Brian Barnett,MD Lee Chang,Murat Altinay,MD Sara Costi,MPHDongWang,MD Sina Nikayin,Mbbs ManishKumarJha,PhDSanjayJ,MD Donald Malone,PhD KaminiKrishnan,MD AmitAnand,MD StevenE.Nissen,Msw KatherineA.Collins,MD Ali Asghar-Ali,MD .Mathew,MD Amy Aloysi,PhDBoHu Ms,MD SamuelT.Wilkinson,PhDJamesMurrough
Abstract:IMPORTANCE The ELEKT-D: Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) vs Ketamine in Patients With Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) (ELEKT-D) trial demonstrated noninferiority of intravenous ketamine vs ECT for nonpsychotic TRD. Clinical features that can guide selection of ketamine vs ECT may inform shared decision-making for patients with TRD. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether selected clinical features were associated with differential improvement with ketamine vs ECT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This secondary analysis of an open-label noninferiority randomized clinical trial was a multicenter study conducted at 5 US academic medical centers from April 7, 2017, to November 11, 2022. Analyses for this study, which were not prespecified in the trial protocol, were conducted from May 10 to Oct 31, 2023. The study cohort included patients with TRD, aged 21 to 75 years, who were in a current nonpsychotic depressive episode of at least moderate severity and were referred for ECT by their clinicians. EXPOSURES
Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?