Production of chemicals and utilities in-house improves the environmental sustainability of phytoplankton-based biorefinery

Mohammadali Kiehbadroudinezhad,Homa Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha,Keikhosro Karimi,Meysam Madadi,Yusuf Chisti,Wanxi Peng,Dan Liu,Meisam Tabatabaei,Mortaza Aghbashlo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165751
2023-11-15
Abstract:Life cycle assessment was used to evaluate the environmental impacts of phytoplanktonic biofuels as possible sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels. Three scenarios were examined for converting planktonic biomass into higher-value commodities and energy streams using the alga Scenedesmus sp. and the cyanobacterium Arthrospira sp. as the species of interest. The first scenario (Sc-1) involved the production of biodiesel and glycerol from the planktonic biomass. In the second scenario (Sc-2), biodiesel and glycerol were generated from the planktonic biomass, and biogas was produced from the residual biomass. The process also involved using a catalyst derived from snail shells for biodiesel production. The third scenario (Sc-3) was similar to Sc-2 but converted CO2 from the biogas upgrading to methanol, which was then used in synthesizing biodiesel. The results indicated that Sc-2 and Sc-3 had a reduced potential (up to 60 % less) for damaging human health compared to Sc-1. Sc-2 and Sc-3 had up to 61 % less environmental impact than Sc-1. Sc-2 and Sc-3 reduced the total cumulative exergy demand by up to 44 % compared to Sc-1. In conclusion, producing chemicals and utilities within the biorefinery could significantly improve environmental sustainability, reduce waste, and diversify revenue streams.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?