Abstract:Background: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRCLM). Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) is considered an effective treatment option for CRCLM. Few studies have investigated the combination of DEB-TACE, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy for CRCLM. In the present study, we evaluated the disease control rate (DCR), adverse events, and survival among patients with CRCLM who underwent the combination of DEB-TACE and chemotherapy/targeted therapy. Materials: We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with CRCLM who were treated between January 2015 and January 2021. Standard systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and 66 DEB-TACE procedures were administered. Data were collected on each DEB-TACE procedure, including chemotherapy agents, tumor burden of liver metastasis, number of DEB-TACE courses, and adverse events. Patients who received DEB-TACE after failure of first-line systemic therapy were categorized into the first-line failure group. Patients who received DEB-TACE after the failure of second-line, third-line, or fourth-line therapy were categorized into the other group. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. Results: In total, 35 patients with CRCLM (34 patients with adenocarcinoma and 1 patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma) were enrolled. In total, 13 patients (37.1%) had extrahepatic metastases at initial diagnosis. In this study, 66 DEB-TACE procedures were performed. The DCR was 54.3%. The median OS period was 47.4 months, and the estimated 3-year OS rate was 59.5%. The median PFS period was 6.3 months, and the estimated 1-year PFS rate was 20.6%. The PFS period was longer in the first-line failure group than in the other group (7.2 vs. 6.3 months). No significant difference was observed in OS between the two groups. Four episodes (6.1%) of grade 3 intra-abdominal infection were observed. Conclusion: The combination of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and DEB-TACE can lead to a favorable DCR and survival outcomes in patients with CRCLM. Early intervention with DEB-TACE (i.e., after the failure of first-line therapy) has the potential to extend the PFS period in patients with CRCLM. Severe adverse events were rare and manageable. Further prospective, randomized controlled studies are warranted to obtain more conclusive findings.

Efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres® microspheres drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in GCLM combined trans-arterial infusion therapy for treating primary focus of gastric cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

Efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres (R) drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in patients with secondary liver cancer: a preliminary result from CTILC study

Safety And Efficacy Of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization With Callispheres (R) Microsphere For Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Preliminary Study

The Comprehensive Analysis Of Efficacy And Safety Of Callispheres (R) Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization In 367 Liver Cancer Patients: A Multiple-Center, Cohort Study

Efficacy And Safety Of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization By Callispheres (R) In 275 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Results From The Chinese Callispheres (R) Transarterial Chemoembolization In Liver Cancer (Ctilc) Study

[Clinical Investigation on Transarterial Chemoembolization with Indigenous Drug-Eluting Beads in Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma].

Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® microsphere for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a preliminary study

Initial Experience of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® Microspheres in Treating Liver Metastases Patients.

CalliSpheres® microsphere transarterial chemoembolization combined with 125I brachytherapy for patients with non–small‐cell lung cancer liver metastases

Efficacy of CalliSpheres® microspheres versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of refractory colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Treatment Response, Survival, and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization With CalliSpheres® Microspheres Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization by CalliSpheres is Effective and Well Tolerated in Treating Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients

Comparison of Treatment Response, Survival Profiles, as Well as Safety Profiles Between CalliSpheres® Microsphere Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Exploring the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in pancreatic cancer liver metastasis

Efficacy and safety of transhepatic arterial chemoembolization with drug-loaded microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer

Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization with CalliSpheres Microspheres for Treatment of Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Efficacy and safety of raltitrexed-eluting CalliSpheres ® bead transarterial chemoembolization in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm, prospective study

Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads combined with systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Assessment of efficacy and safety by CalliSpheres versus HepaSpheres for drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors with Liver Metastases

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) in colorectal liver metastasis: Efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors