Machine learning improves the prediction of significant fibrosis in Asian patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease – The Gut and Obesity in Asia (GO‐ASIA) Study
Nipun Verma,Ajay Duseja,Manu Mehta,Arka De,Huapeng Lin,Vincent Wai‐Sun Wong,Grace Lai‐Hung Wong,Ruveena Bhavani Rajaram,Wah‐Kheong Chan,Sanjiv Mahadeva,Ming‐Hua Zheng,Wen‐Yue Liu,Sombat Treeprasertsuk,Thaninee Prasoppokakorn,Satoru Kakizaki,Yosuke Seki,Kazunori Kasama,Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya,Phalath Sathirawich,Anand Kulkarni,Hery Djagat Purnomo,Lubna Kamani,Yeong Yeh Lee,Mung Seong Wong,Eunice X. X. Tan,Dan Yock Young
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17891
IF: 9.524
2024-02-03
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Abstract:As compared to current standard FIB‐4, machine learning outperforms detection of significant fibrosis in patients with biopsy proven metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease by 10 times higher odds of fibrosis detection, 28% reduction of unnecessary referrals and 78% prevention of missed referrals. Summary Background The precise estimation of cases with significant fibrosis (SF) is an unmet goal in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD/MASLD). Aims We evaluated the performance of machine learning (ML) and non‐patented scores for ruling out SF among NAFLD/MASLD patients. Methods Twenty‐one ML models were trained (N = 1153), tested (N = 283), and validated (N = 220) on clinical and biochemical parameters of histologically‐proven NAFLD/MASLD patients (N = 1656) collected across 14 centres in 8 Asian countries. Their performance for detecting histological‐SF (≥F2fibrosis) were evaluated with APRI, FIB4, NFS, BARD, and SAFE (NPV/F1‐score as model‐selection criteria). Results Patients aged 47 years (median), 54.6% males, 73.7% with metabolic syndrome, and 32.9% with histological‐SF were included in the study. Patients with SFvs.no‐SF had higher age, aminotransferases, fasting plasma glucose, metabolic syndrome, uncontrolled diabetes, and NAFLD activity score (p 140) was next best in ruling out SF (NPV of 0.757, 0.724 and 0.827 in overall, test and validation set). Conclusions ML with clinical, anthropometric data and simple blood investigations perform better than FIB‐4 for ruling out SF in biopsy‐proven Asian NAFLD/MASLD patients.
pharmacology & pharmacy,gastroenterology & hepatology