The temporal association between social isolation, distress, and psychotic experiences in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis
Zeynep Akcaoglu,Thomas Vaessen,Eva Velthorst,Ginette Lafit,Robin Achterhof,Barnaby Nelson,Patrick McGorry,Frederike Schirmbeck,Craig Morgan,Jessica Hartmann,Mark van der Gaag,Lieuwe de Haan,Lucia Valmaggia,Philip McGuire,Matthew Kempton,Henrietta Steinhart,Annelie Klippel,Wolfgang Viechtbauer,Tim Batink,Ruud van Winkel,Thérèse van Amelsvoort,Machteld Marcelis,Evelyne van Aubel,Ulrich Reininghaus,Inez Myin-Germeys,EU-GEI High Risk Study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291723003598
IF: 10.592
2024-01-06
Psychological Medicine
Abstract:Background Psychotic experiences (PEs) and social isolation (SI) seem related during early stages of psychosis, but the temporal dynamics between the two are not clear. Literature so far suggests a self-perpetuating cycle wherein momentary increases in PEs lead to social withdrawal, which, subsequently, triggers PEs at a next point in time, especially when SI is associated with increased distress. The current study investigated the daily-life temporal associations between SI and PEs, as well as the role of SI-related and general affective distress in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. Methods We used experience sampling methodology in a sample of 137 CHR participants. We analyzed the association between SI, PEs, and distress using time-lagged linear mixed-effects models. Results SI did not predict next-moment fluctuations in PEs, or vice versa. Furthermore, although SI-related distress was not predictive of subsequent PEs, general affective distress during SI was a robust predictor of next-moment PEs. Conclusions Our results suggest that SI and PEs are not directly related on a moment-to-moment level, but a negative emotional state when alone does contribute to the risk of PEs. These findings highlight the role of affective wellbeing during early-stage psychosis development.
psychiatry,psychology, clinical