An Algorithmic Approach to Dual-System Venous Drainage for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Samer Jabbour,Richard Youn,Kevin G Kim,Abigail R Tirrell,Patrick W Harbour,Paige K Dekker,Kenneth L Fan,David H Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010927

2024-07-01

Abstract:Background: Few studies compared the use of the deep venous system alone versus combined superficial and deep venous drainage in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. The objective of this study was to compare DIEP flap breast reconstruction using either the deep venous system alone versus dual-system venous drainage and to propose an algorithm for flap design and orientation and vein selection to facilitate consistent use of dual-system venous drainage. Methods: Patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction between March of 2017 and April of 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Flaps were divided into 2 groups: deep venous system only (group 1) or dual system (group 2). Outcomes included take-back to the operating room, flap loss and thrombosis, and operative time. Results: A total of 244 DIEP flaps in 162 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 130 flaps were included in group 1 (53.3%) and 114 flaps were included in group 2 (46.7%). Sixteen flaps (6.6%) required immediate take-back to the operating room, and take-back rates were not significantly different between groups ( P = 0.606). The flap loss rate was significantly higher in group 1 at 2.5% versus group 2 at 0% ( P = 0.031). Flap thrombosis occurred in 8 flaps (3.3%) and tended to occur more frequently in group 1, but this finding did not reach significance (group 1, 5.4%; group 2, 0.9%; P = 0.071). Conclusions: The use of dual-system venous drainage in DIEP flap breast reconstruction decreases the rate of flap loss. The authors' algorithm can be used to guide selection of flap laterality, rotation, and veins and recipient vessels to facilitate routine use of dual-system venous drainage. Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.