The effect of emotional distress on persistent pelvic girdle pain after delivery: a longitudinal population study

E. Bjelland,B. Stuge,B. Engdahl,M. Eberhard-Gran,M. Eberhard-Gran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12029

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To study the prognosis for pelvic girdle pain, and to explore the association between presence of emotional distress during pregnancy and pelvic girdle syndrome 6 months after delivery.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A prediction model based on machine learning for diagnosing the early COVID-19 patients

Nan-Nan Sun,Ya Yang,Ling-Ling Tang,Yi-Ning Dai,Hai-Nv Gao,Hong-Ying Pan,Bin Ju

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.03.20120881

2020-01-01

MedRxiv

Abstract:AbstractWith the dramatically fast spread of COVID-9, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test has become the gold standard method for confirmation of COVID-19 infection. However, RT-PCR tests are complicated in operation andIt usually takes 5-6 hours or even longer to get the result. Additionally, due to the low virus loads in early COVID-19 patients, RT-PCR tests display false negative results in a number of cases. Analyzing complex medical datasets based on machine learning provides health care workers excellent opportunities for developing a simple and efficient COVID-19 diagnostic system. This paper aims at extracting risk factors from clinical data of early COVID-19 infected patients and utilizing four types of traditional machine learning approaches including logistic regression(LR), support vector machine(SVM), decision tree(DT), random forest(RF) and a deep learning-based method for diagnosis of early COVID-19. The results show that the LR predictive model presents a higher specificity rate of 0.95, an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.971 and an improved sensitivity rate of 0.82, which makes it optimal for the screening of early COVID-19 infection. We also perform the verification for generality of the best model (LR predictive model) among Zhejiang population, and analyze the contribution of the factors to the predictive models. Our manuscript describes and highlights the ability of machine learning methods for improving the accuracy and timeliness of early COVID-19 infection diagnosis. The higher AUC of our LR-base predictive model makes it a more conducive method for assisting COVID-19 diagnosis. The optimal model has been encapsulated as a mobile application (APP) and implemented in some hospitals in Zhejiang Province.
Machine Learning–Based Predictive Modeling of Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms During 8 Months of the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey Study

Katrina Hueniken,Nibene Habib Somé,Mohamed Abdelhack,Graham Taylor,Tara Elton Marshall,Christine M Wickens,Hayley A Hamilton,Samantha Wells,Daniel Felsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/32876

2021-11-17

JMIR Mental Health

Abstract:Background The COVID-19 global pandemic has increased the burden of mental illness on Canadian adults. However, the complex combination of demographic, economic, and lifestyle factors and perceived health risks contributing to patterns of anxiety and depression has not been explored. Objective The aim of this study is to harness flexible machine learning methods to identify constellations of factors related to symptoms of mental illness and to understand their changes over time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Cross-sectional samples of Canadian adults (aged ≥18 years) completed web-based surveys in 6 waves from May to December 2020 (N=6021), and quota sampling strategies were used to match the English-speaking Canadian population in age, gender, and region. The surveys measured anxiety and depression symptoms, sociodemographic characteristics, substance use, and perceived COVID-19 risks and worries. First, principal component analysis was used to condense highly comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms into a single data-driven measure of emotional distress. Second, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), a machine learning algorithm that can model nonlinear and interactive relationships, was used to regress this measure on all included explanatory variables. Variable importance and effects across time were explored using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results Principal component analysis of responses to 9 anxiety and depression questions on an ordinal scale revealed a primary latent factor, termed “emotional distress,” that explained 76% of the variation in all 9 measures. Our XGBoost model explained a substantial proportion of variance in emotional distress (r2=0.39). The 3 most important items predicting elevated emotional distress were increased worries about finances (SHAP=0.17), worries about getting COVID-19 (SHAP=0.17), and younger age (SHAP=0.13). Hopefulness was associated with emotional distress and moderated the impacts of several other factors. Predicted emotional distress exhibited a nonlinear pattern over time, with the highest predicted symptoms in May and November and the lowest in June. Conclusions Our results highlight factors that may exacerbate emotional distress during the current pandemic and possible future pandemics, including a role of hopefulness in moderating distressing effects of other factors. The pandemic disproportionately affected emotional distress among younger adults and those economically impacted.

psychiatry
Using machine learning to predict COVID-19 infection and severity risk among 4510 aged adults: a UK Biobank cohort study

Auriel A. Willette,Sara A. Willette,Qian Wang,Colleen Pappas,Brandon S. Klinedinst,Scott Le,Brittany Larsen,Amy Pollpeter,Tianqi Li,Jonathan P. Mochel,Karin Allenspach,Nicole Brenner,Tim Waterboer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07307-z

IF: 4.6

2022-05-12

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Many risk factors have emerged for novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). It is relatively unknown how these factors collectively predict COVID-19 infection risk, as well as risk for a severe infection (i.e., hospitalization). Among aged adults (69.3 ± 8.6 years) in UK Biobank, COVID-19 data was downloaded for 4510 participants with 7539 test cases. We downloaded baseline data from 10 to 14 years ago, including demographics, biochemistry, body mass, and other factors, as well as antibody titers for 20 common to rare infectious diseases in a subset of 80 participants with 124 test cases. Permutation-based linear discriminant analysis was used to predict COVID-19 risk and hospitalization risk. Probability and threshold metrics included receiver operating characteristic curves to derive area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, and quadratic mean. Model predictions using the full cohort were marginal. The "best-fit" model for predicting COVID-19 risk was found in the subset of participants with antibody titers, which achieved excellent discrimination (AUC 0.969, 95% CI 0.934–1.000). Factors included age, immune markers, lipids, and serology titers to common pathogens like human cytomegalovirus. The hospitalization "best-fit" model was more modest (AUC 0.803, 95% CI 0.663–0.943) and included only serology titers, again in the subset group. Accurate risk profiles can be created using standard self-report and biomedical data collected in public health and medical settings. It is also worthwhile to further investigate if prior host immunity predicts current host immunity to COVID-19.

multidisciplinary sciences
Can machine learning models predict maternal and newborn healthcare providers' perception of safety during the COVID-19 pandemic? A cross-sectional study of a global online survey

Bassel Hammoud,Aline Semaan,Imad Elhajj,Lenka Benova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-022-00758-5

2022-08-19

Abstract:Background: Maternal and newborn healthcare providers are essential professional groups vulnerable to physical and psychological risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. This study uses machine learning algorithms to create a predictive tool for maternal and newborn healthcare providers' perception of being safe in the workplace globally during the pandemic. Methods: We used data collected between 24 March and 5 July 2020 through a global online survey of maternal and newborn healthcare providers. The questionnaire was available in 12 languages. To predict healthcare providers' perception of safety in the workplace, we used features collected in the questionnaire, in addition to publicly available national economic and COVID-19-related factors. We built, trained and tested five machine learning models: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, CatBoost and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for classification and regression. We extracted from RF models the relative contribution of features in output prediction. Results: Models included data from 941 maternal and newborn healthcare providers from 89 countries. ML models performed well in classification and regression tasks, whereby RF had 82% cross-validated accuracy for classification, and CatBoost with 0.46 cross-validated root mean square error for regression. In both classification and regression, the most important features contributing to output prediction were classified as three themes: (1) information accessibility, clarity and quality; (2) availability of support and means of protection; and (3) COVID-19 epidemiology. Conclusion: This study identified salient features contributing to maternal and newborn healthcare providers perception of safety in the workplace. The developed tool can be used by health systems globally to allow real-time learning from data collected during a health system shock. By responding in real-time to the needs of healthcare providers, health systems could prevent potential negative consequences on the quality of care offered to women and newborns.
Exploring Socioeconomic Status as a Global Determinant of COVID-19 Prevalence, Using Exploratory Data Analytic and Supervised Machine Learning Techniques: Algorithm Development and Validation Study

Luke Winston,Michael McCann,George Onofrei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/35114

2022-09-28

JMIR Formative Research

Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic represents the most unprecedented global challenge in recent times. As the global community attempts to manage the pandemic in the long term, it is pivotal to understand what factors drive prevalence rates and to predict the future trajectory of the virus. Objective: This study had 2 objectives. First, it tested the statistical relationship between socioeconomic status and COVID-19 prevalence. Second, it used machine learning techniques to predict cumulative COVID-19 cases in a multicountry sample of 182 countries. Taken together, these objectives will shed light on socioeconomic status as a global risk factor of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This research used exploratory data analysis and supervised machine learning methods. Exploratory analysis included variable distribution, variable correlations, and outlier detection. Following this, the following 3 supervised regression techniques were applied: linear regression, random forest, and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost). Results were evaluated using k-fold cross-validation and subsequently compared to analyze algorithmic suitability. The analysis involved 2 models. First, the algorithms were trained to predict 2021 COVID-19 prevalence using only 2020 reported case data. Following this, socioeconomic indicators were added as features and the algorithms were trained again. The Human Development Index (HDI) metrics of life expectancy, mean years of schooling, expected years of schooling, and gross national income were used to approximate socioeconomic status. Results: All variables correlated positively with the 2021 COVID-19 prevalence, with R 2 values ranging from 0.55 to 0.85. Using socioeconomic indicators, COVID-19 prevalence was predicted with a reasonable degree of accuracy. Using 2020 reported case rates as a lone predictor to predict 2021 prevalence rates, the average predictive accuracy of the algorithms was low (R 2 =0.543). When socioeconomic indicators were added alongside 2020 prevalence rates as features, the average predictive performance improved considerably (R 2 =0.721) and all error statistics decreased. Thus, adding socioeconomic indicators alongside 2020 reported case data optimized the prediction of COVID-19 prevalence to a considerable degree. Linear regression was the strongest learner with R 2 =0.693 on the first model and R 2 =0.763 on the second model, followed by random forest (0.481 and 0.722) and AdaBoost (0.454 and 0.679). Following this, the second model was retrained using a selection of additional COVID-19 risk factors (population density, median age, and vaccination uptake) instead of the HDI metrics. However, average accuracy dropped to 0.649, which highlights the value of socioeconomic status as a predictor of COVID-19 cases in the chosen sample. Conclusions: The results show that socioeconomic status is an important variable to consider in future epidemiological modeling, and highlights the reality of the COVID-19 pandemic as a social phenomenon and a health care phenomenon. This paper also puts forward new considerations about the application of statistical and machine learning techniques to understand and combat the COVID-19 pandemic.
Identifying psychological predictors of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A machine learning study

Michael V Bronstein,Erich Kummerfeld,Angus MacDonald 3rd,Sophia Vinogradov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126198

IF: 4.169

2024-08-30

Vaccine

Abstract:Background: Major barriers to addressing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy include limited knowledge of what causes delay/refusal of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and limited ability to predict who will remain unvaccinated over significant time periods despite vaccine availability. The present study begins to address these barriers by developing a machine learning model that prospectively predicts who will persist in not vaccinating against SARS-CoV-2. Method: Unvaccinated individuals (n = 325) who completed a baseline survey were followed over the six-month period when vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 were first widely available (April-October 2021). A random forest model was used to predict who would remain unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 from their baseline measures, including demographic information (e.g., age), medical history (e.g., of influenza vaccination), Health-Belief Model constructs (e.g., perceived vaccine dangerousness), conspiracist ideation, and task-based metrics of vulnerability to conspiracist ideation (e.g., tendency toward illusory pattern perception). Results: The resulting model significantly predicted vaccination status (AUC-PR = 0.77, 95%CI [0.56 0.90]). At the optimal probability threshold determined by the Generalized Threshold Shifting Protocol, the model was moderately precise (0.83) when identifying individuals who remained unvaccinated (n = 80), and had a very low rate (0.04) of false-positives (incorrectly suggesting that individuals remained unvaccinated). Permutational importance tests suggested that baseline SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intentions conveyed the most information about future SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status. Conspiracist ideation was the second most informative predictor, suggesting that misinformation influences vaccination behavior. Other important predictors included perceived vaccine dangerousness, as expected under the Health Belief Model, and influenza vaccination history. Conclusions: The model we developed can accurately and prospectively identify individuals who remain unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. It could therefore facilitate empirically-informed allocation of interventions that encourage vaccine uptake. The predictive value of conspiracist ideation, perceived vaccine dangerousness, and vaccine intentions in our model is consistent with potential causal relations between these variables and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake.
Machine learning-enabled mental health risk prediction for youths with stressful life events: A modelling study

Hexiao Ding,Na Li,Lishan Li,Ziruo Xu,Wei Xia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.111

2024-09-19

Abstract:Background: Youths face significant mental health challenges exacerbated by stressful life events, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Immature coping strategies can worsen mental health outcomes. Methods: This study utilised a two-wave cross-sectional survey design with data collected from Chinese youth aged 14-25 years. Wave 1 (N = 3038) and Wave 2 (N = 539) datasets were used for model development and external validation, respectively. Twenty-five features, encompassing dimensions related to demographic information, stressful life events, social support, coping strategies, and emotional intelligence, were input into the model to predict the mental health status of youth, which was considered their coping outcome. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) was used to determine the importance of each risk factor in the feature selection. The intersection of top 10 features identified by random forest and XGBoost were considered the most influential predictors of mental health during the feature selection process, and was then taken as the final set of features for model development. Machine learning models, including logistic regression, AdaBoost, and a backpropagation neural network (BPNN), were trained to predict the outcomes. The optimum model was selected according to the performance in both internal and external validation. Results: This study identified six key features that were significantly associated with mental health outcomes: punishment, adaptation issues, self-regulation of emotions, learning pressure, use of social support, and recognition of others' emotions. The BPNN model, optimized through feature selection methods like SHAP, demonstrated superior performance in internal validation (C-index [95 % CI] = 0.9120 [0.9111, 0.9129], F-score [95 % CI] = 0.8861 [0.8853, 0.8869]). Additionally, external validation showed the model had strong discrimination (C-index = 0.9749, F-score = 0.8442) and calibration (Brier score = 0.029) capabilities. Limitations: Although the clinical prediction model performed well, the study it still limited by self-reported data and representativeness of samples. Causal relationships need to be established to interpret the coping mechanism from multiple perspectives. Also, the limited data on minority groups may lead to algorithmic unfairness. Conclusions: Machine learning models effectively identified and predicted mental health outcomes among youths, with the SHAP+BPNN model showing promising clinical applicability. These findings emphasise the importance and effectiveness of targeted interventions with the help of clinical prediction model.
Prediction of Online Psychological Help-Seeking Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interpretable Machine Learning Method

Hui Liu,Lin Zhang,Weijun Wang,Yinghui Huang,Shen Li,Zhihong Ren,Zongkui Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.814366

IF: 5.2

2022-03-03

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Online mental health service (OMHS) has been named as the best psychological assistance measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. An interpretable, accurate, and early prediction for the demand of OMHS is crucial to local governments and organizations which need to allocate and make the decision in mental health resources. The present study aimed to investigate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the online psychological help-seeking (OPHS) behavior in the OMHS, then propose a machine learning model to predict and interpret the OPHS number in advance. The data was crawled from two Chinese OMHS platforms. Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC), neural embedding-based topic modeling, and time series analysis were utilized to build time series feature sets with lagging one, three, seven, and 14 days. Correlation analysis was used to examine the impact of COVID-19 on OPHS behaviors across different OMHS platforms. Machine learning algorithms and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) were used to build the prediction. The result showed that the massive growth of OPHS behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic was a common phenomenon. The predictive model based on random forest (RF) and feature sets containing temporal features of the OPHS number, mental health topics, LIWC, and COVID-19 cases achieved the best performance. Temporal features of the OPHS number showed the biggest positive and negative predictive power. The topic features had incremental effects on performance of the prediction across different lag days and were more suitable for OPHS prediction compared to the LIWC features. The interpretable model showed that the increase in the OPHS behaviors was impacted by the cumulative confirmed cases and cumulative deaths, while it was not sensitive in the new confirmed cases or new deaths. The present study was the first to predict the demand for OMHS using machine learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study suggests an interpretable machine learning method that can facilitate quick, early, and interpretable prediction of the OPHS behavior and to support the operational decision-making; it also demonstrated the power of utilizing the OMHS platforms as an always-on data source to obtain a high-resolution timeline and real-time prediction of the psychological response of the online public.

public, environmental & occupational health
Using machine learning to unveil relevant predictors of adherence to recommended health‐protective behaviors during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark

Lau Lilleholt,Gretchen B. Chapman,Robert Böhm,Ingo Zettler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12563

2024-06-10

Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being

Abstract:What were relevant predictors of individuals' proclivity to adhere to recommended health‐protective behaviors during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark? Applying machine learning (namely, lasso regression) to a repeated cross‐sectional survey spanning 10 months comprising 25 variables (Study 1; N = 15,062), we found empathy toward those most vulnerable to COVID‐19, knowledge about how to protect oneself from getting infected, and perceived moral costs of nonadherence to be strong predictors of individuals' self‐reported adherence to recommended health‐protective behaviors. We further explored the relations between these three factors and individuals' self‐reported proclivity for adherence to recommended health‐protective behaviors as they unfold between and within individuals over time in a second study, a Danish panel study comprising eight measurement occasions spanning eight months (N = 441). Results of this study suggest that the relations largely occurred at the trait‐like interindividual level, as opposed to at the state‐like intraindividual level. Together, the findings provide insights into what were relevant predictors for individuals' overall level of adherence to recommended health‐protective behaviors (in Denmark) as well as how these predictors might (not) be leveraged to promote public adherence in future epidemics or pandemics.

psychology, applied
Identifying Predictors of Psychological Distress During COVID-19: A Machine Learning Approach

Tracy A. Prout,Sigal Zilcha-Mano,Katie Aafjes-van Doorn,Vera Békés,Isabelle Christman-Cohen,Kathryn Whistler,Thomas Kui,Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586202

IF: 3.8

2020-11-05

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Scientific understanding about the psychological impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic is in its nascent stage. Prior research suggests that demographic factors, such as gender and age, are associated with greater distress during a global health crisis. Less is known about how emotion regulation impacts levels of distress during a pandemic. The present study aimed to identify predictors of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants (<i>N</i> = 2,787) provided demographics, history of adverse childhood experiences, current coping strategies (use of implicit and explicit emotion regulation), and current psychological distress. The overall prevalence of clinical levels of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress was higher than the prevalence outside a pandemic and was higher than rates reported among healthcare workers and survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Younger participants (<45 years), women, and non-binary individuals reported higher prevalence of symptoms across all measures of distress. A random forest machine learning algorithm was used to identify the strongest predictors of distress. Regression trees were developed to identify individuals at greater risk for anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. Somatization and less reliance on adaptive defense mechanisms were associated with greater distress. These findings highlight the importance of assessing individuals' physical experiences of psychological distress and emotion regulation strategies to help mental health providers tailor assessments and treatment during a global health crisis.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Depression Symptoms Among Chinese Healthcare Workers During the Early COVID-19 Outbreak in 2020: A Cross-Sectional Study

Zhaohe Zhou,Dan Luo,Bing Xiang Yang,Zhongchun Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.876995

IF: 4.7

2022-04-29

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Background The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)-related depression symptoms of healthcare workers have received worldwide recognition. Although many studies identified risk exposures associated with depression symptoms among healthcare workers, few have focused on a predictive model using machine learning methods. As a society, governments, and organizations are concerned about the need for immediate interventions and alert systems for healthcare workers who are mentally at-risk. This study aims to develop and validate machine learning-based models for predicting depression symptoms using survey data collected during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Method Surveys were conducted of 2,574 healthcare workers in hospitals designated to care for COVID-19 patients between 20 January and 11 February 2020. The patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-9 was used to measure the depression symptoms and quantify the severity, a score of ≥5 on the PHQ-9 represented depression symptoms positive, respectively. Four machine learning approaches were trained (75% of data) and tested (25% of data). Cross-validation with 100 repetitions was applied to the training dataset for hyperparameter tuning. Finally, all models were compared to evaluate their predictive performances and screening utility: decision tree, logistics regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest, and gradient-boosting tree. Results Important risk predictors identified and ranked by the machine learning models were highly consistent: self-perceived health status factors always occupied the top five most important predictors, followed by worried about infection, working on the frontline, a very high level of uncertainty, having received any form of psychological support material and having COVID-19-like symptoms. The area under the curve [95% CI] of machine learning models were as follows: LASSO model, 0.824 [0.792–0.856]; random forest, 0.828 [0.797–0.859]; gradient-boosting tree, 0.829 [0.798–0.861]; and decision tree, 0.785 [0.752–0.819]. The calibration plot indicated that the LASSO model, random forest, and gradient-boosting tree fit the data well. Decision curve analysis showed that all models obtained net benefits for predicting depression symptoms. Conclusions This study shows that machine learning prediction models are suitable for making predictions about mentally at-risk healthcare workers predictions in a public health emergency setting. The application of multidimensional machine learning models could support hospitals' and healthcare workers' decision-making on possible psychological interventions and proper mental health management.

psychiatry
Machine learning for anxiety and depression profiling and risk assessment in the aftermath of an emergency

Guillermo Villanueva Benito,Ximena Goldberg,Rafael de Cid,Nicolai Brachowicz,Gemma Castaño-Vinyals,Natàlia Blay,Ana Espinosa,Flavia Davidhi,Diego Torres Dho,Manolis Kogevinas,Paula Petrone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4685922

IF: 7.011

2024-10-01

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract:Background & objectives Mental health disorders pose an increasing public health challenge worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic highlighted gaps in preparedness, emphasizing the need for early identification of at-risk groups and targeted interventions. This study aims to develop a risk assessment tool for anxiety, depression, and self-perceived stress using machine learning (ML) and explainable AI to identify key risk factors and stratify the population into meaningful risk profiles. Methods We utilized a cohort of 9291 individuals from Northern Spain, with extensive post-COVID-19 mental health surveys. ML classification algorithms predicted depression, anxiety, and self-reported stress in three classes: healthy, mild, and severe outcomes. A novel combination of SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection) was employed to interpret model predictions and facilitate the identification of high-risk phenotypic clusters. Results The mean macro-averaged one-vs-one AUROC was 0.77 (± 0.01) for depression, 0.72 (± 0.01) for anxiety, and 0.73 (± 0.02) for self-perceived stress. Key risk factors included poor self-reported health, chronic mental health conditions, and poor social support. High-risk profiles, such as women with reduced sleep hours, were identified for self-perceived stress. Binary classification of healthy vs. at-risk classes yielded F1-Scores over 0.70. Conclusions Combining SHAP with UMAP for risk profile stratification offers valuable insights for developing effective interventions and shaping public health policies. This data-driven approach to mental health preparedness, when validated in real-world scenarios, can significantly address the mental health impact of public health crises like COVID-19.

engineering, biomedical,computer science, artificial intelligence,medical informatics
Learning the Mental Health Impact of COVID-19 in the United States With Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Observational Study

Indra Prakash Jha,Raghav Awasthi,Ajit Kumar,Vibhor Kumar,Tavpritesh Sethi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/25097

2021-04-20

JMIR Mental Health

Abstract:Background The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the health, economic, and social fabric of many nations worldwide. Identification of individual-level susceptibility factors may help people in identifying and managing their emotional, psychological, and social well-being. Objective This study is focused on learning a ranked list of factors that could indicate a predisposition to a mental disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods In this study, we have used a survey of 17,764 adults in the United States from different age groups, genders, and socioeconomic statuses. Through initial statistical analysis and Bayesian network inference, we have identified key factors affecting mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Integrating Bayesian networks with classical machine learning approaches led to effective modeling of the level of mental health prevalence. Results Overall, females were more stressed than males, and people in the age group 18-29 years were more vulnerable to anxiety than other age groups. Using the Bayesian network model, we found that people with a chronic mental illness were more prone to mental disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. The new realities of working from home; homeschooling; and lack of communication with family, friends, and neighbors induces mental pressure. Financial assistance from social security helps in reducing mental stress during the COVID-19–generated economic crises. Finally, using supervised machine learning models, we predicted the most mentally vulnerable people with ~80% accuracy. Conclusions Multiple factors such as social isolation, digital communication, and working and schooling from home were identified as factors of mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regular in-person communication with friends and family, a healthy social life, and social security were key factors, and taking care of people with a history of mental disease appears to be even more important during this time.

psychiatry
A machine learning analysis of COVID-19 mental health data

Mostafa Rezapour,Lucas Hansen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19314-1

IF: 4.6

2022-09-03

Scientific Reports

Abstract:In late December 2019, the novel coronavirus (Sars-Cov-2) and the resulting disease COVID-19 were first identified in Wuhan China. The disease slipped through containment measures, with the first known case in the United States being identified on January 20th, 2020. In this paper, we utilize survey data from the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and apply several statistical and machine learning models and techniques such as Decision Trees, Multinomial Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, Random Forests, Gradient Tree Boosting, XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, Synthetic Minority Oversampling, and Chi-Squared Test to analyze the impacts the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the mental health of frontline workers in the United States. Through the interpretation of the many models applied to the mental health survey data, we have concluded that the most important factor in predicting the mental health decline of a frontline worker is the healthcare role the individual is in (Nurse, Emergency Room Staff, Surgeon, etc.), followed by the amount of sleep the individual has had in the last week, the amount of COVID-19 related news an individual has consumed on average in a day, the age of the worker, and the usage of alcohol and cannabis.

multidisciplinary sciences
Predicting the Severity of Lockdown-Induced Psychiatric Symptoms with Machine Learning

Giordano D’Urso,Alfonso Magliacano,Sayna Rotbei,Felice Iasevoli,Andrea de Bartolomeis,Alessio Botta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040957

IF: 3.6

2022-04-12

Diagnostics

Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in the incidence of psychiatric disorders in the general population and an increase in the severity of symptoms in psychiatric patients have been reported. Anxiety and depression symptoms are the most commonly observed during large-scale dramatic events such as pandemics and wars, especially when these implicate an extended lockdown. The early detection of higher risk clinical and non-clinical individuals would help prevent the new onset and/or deterioration of these symptoms. This in turn would lead to the implementation of public policies aimed at protecting vulnerable populations during these dramatic contingencies, therefore optimising the effectiveness of interventions and saving the resources of national healthcare systems. We used a supervised machine learning method to identify the predictors of the severity of psychiatric symptoms during the Italian lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Via a case study, we applied this methodology to a small sample of healthy individuals, obsessive-compulsive disorder patients, and adjustment disorder patients. Our preliminary results show that our models were able to predict depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms during the lockdown with up to 92% accuracy based on demographic and clinical characteristics collected before the pandemic. The presented methodology may be used to predict the psychiatric prognosis of individuals under a large-scale lockdown and thus supporting the related clinical decisions.

medicine, general & internal
Analyzing the Relationship Between COVID-19 and Sociodemographic and Environmental Factors: A Case Study in Toronto

Brian Anlan Yu,Qinmin Vivian Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13224524

IF: 2.9

2024-11-27

Electronics

Abstract:COVID-19 has disproportionately impacted communities based on sociodemographic and environmental factors. Previous studies have largely focused on traditional statistical models to investigate these disparities with limited attention to within-city variations. This research addresses this gap by employing advanced machine learning models to predict COVID-19 case counts at the neighborhood level within Toronto. Using algorithms such as Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost, along with SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis, we identify key factors impacting COVID-19 transmission, including air pollution, socioeconomic status, and racialized group membership. Our results demonstrate that sociodemographic factors significantly influence sporadic cases, while environmental factors, particularly air pollutants, are critical in outbreak cases. This study highlights the value of machine learning in understanding complex interactions between risk factors with implications for targeted public health interventions to mitigate COVID-19 disparities.

engineering, electrical & electronic,computer science, information systems,physics, applied
Relationship matters: Using machine learning methods to predict the mental health severity of Chinese college freshmen during the pandemic period

Wenhao Kong,Zeyuan Pei,Ziyan Guo,Ran Xu,Jialu Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.168

2024-09-26

Abstract:Background: Pandemics act as stressors and may lead to frequent mental health disorders. College student, especially freshmen, are particularly susceptible to experiencing intense mental stress reactions during a pandemic. We aimed to identify stable and intervenable variables including academic, relationship and economic factors, and focused on their impact on mental health severity during the pandemic period. Methods: We innovatively combined diverse machine learning methods, including XGBoost, SHAP, and K-means clustering, to predict the mental health severity of college freshmen. A total of 3281 college freshmen participated in the research. Discriminant analyses were performed on groups of participants with depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7). All characteristic variables were selected based on their importance and interventionability. Further analyses were conducted with selected features to determine the optimal variable combination. Results: XGBoost analysis revealed that relationship factors exhibited the highest predictive capacity for mental health severity among college freshmen (SHAPFamily Relationship = 0.373; SHAPPeer Support = 0.236). The impact of academic factors on college freshmen's mental health severity depended on their intricate interplay with relationship factors, resulting in complex interactive effects. These effects were heterogeneous among different subgroups. Conclusions: The proposed machine learning approach utilizing XGBoost, SHAP and K-means clustering methods provides a valuable tool to gain insights into the relative contributions of academic, relationship and economic factors to Chinese college freshmen's mental health severity during the COVID-19 pandemic. The result guide the development of targeted intervention measures tailored to meet specific requirements within each subgroup.
Personalized Stratification of Hospitalization Risk Amidst COVID-19: A Machine Learning Approach.

Carson Lam,Jacob Calvert,Anna Siefkas,Gina Barnes,Emily Pellegrini,Abigail Green-Saxena,Jana Hoffman,Qingqing Mao,Ritankar Das

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100554

IF: 5.211

2021-01-01

Health Policy and Technology

Abstract:Objective: In the wake of COVID-19, the United States (U.S.) developed a three stage plan to outline the parameters to determine when states may reopen businesses and ease travel restrictions. The guidelines also identify subpopulations of Americans deemed to be at high risk for severe disease should they contract COVID-19. These guidelines were based on population level demographics, rather than individual-level risk factors. As such, they may misidentify individuals at high risk for severe illness, and may therefore be of limited use in decisions surrounding resource allocation to vulnerable populations. The objective of this study was to evaluate a machine learning algorithm for prediction of serious illness due to COVID-19 using inpatient data collected from electronic health records. Methods: The algorithm was trained to identify patients for whom a diagnosis of COVID-19 was likely to result in hospitalization, and compared against four U.S. policy-based criteria: age over 65; having a serious underlying health condition; age over 65 or having a serious underlying health condition; and age over 65 and having a serious underlying health condition. Results: This algorithm identified 80% of patients at risk for hospitalization due to COVID-19, versus 62% identified by government guidelines. The algorithm also achieved a high specificity of 95%, outperforming government guidelines. Conclusions: This algorithm may identify individuals likely to require hospitalization should they contract COVID-19. This information may be useful to guide vaccine distribution, anticipate hospital resource needs, and assist health care policymakers to make care decisions in a more principled manner.
Leveraging Social Media to Predict COVID-19-Induced Disruptions to Mental Well-Being Among University Students: Modeling Study

Vedant Das Swain,Jingjing Ye,Siva Karthik Ramesh,Abhirup Mondal,Gregory D Abowd,Munmun De Choudhury

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/52316

2024-06-25

Abstract:Background: Large-scale crisis events such as COVID-19 often have secondary impacts on individuals' mental well-being. University students are particularly vulnerable to such impacts. Traditional survey-based methods to identify those in need of support do not scale over large populations and they do not provide timely insights. We pursue an alternative approach through social media data and machine learning. Our models aim to complement surveys and provide early, precise, and objective predictions of students disrupted by COVID-19. Objective: This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of language on private social media as an indicator of crisis-induced disruption to mental well-being. Methods: We modeled 4124 Facebook posts provided by 43 undergraduate students, spanning over 2 years. We extracted temporal trends in the psycholinguistic attributes of their posts and comments. These trends were used as features to predict how COVID-19 disrupted their mental well-being. Results: The social media-enabled model had an F1-score of 0.79, which was a 39% improvement over a model trained on the self-reported mental state of the participant. The features we used showed promise in predicting other mental states such as anxiety, depression, social, isolation, and suicidal behavior (F1-scores varied between 0.85 and 0.93). We also found that selecting the windows of time 7 months after the COVID-19-induced lockdown presented better results, therefore, paving the way for data minimization. Conclusions: We predicted COVID-19-induced disruptions to mental well-being by developing a machine learning model that leveraged language on private social media. The language in these posts described psycholinguistic trends in students' online behavior. These longitudinal trends helped predict mental well-being disruption better than models trained on correlated mental health questionnaires. Our work inspires further research into the potential applications of early, precise, and automatic warnings for individuals concerned about their mental health in times of crisis.

The effect of emotional distress on persistent pelvic girdle pain after delivery: a longitudinal population study

A prediction model based on machine learning for diagnosing the early COVID-19 patients

Machine Learning–Based Predictive Modeling of Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms During 8 Months of the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey Study

Using machine learning to predict COVID-19 infection and severity risk among 4510 aged adults: a UK Biobank cohort study

Can machine learning models predict maternal and newborn healthcare providers' perception of safety during the COVID-19 pandemic? A cross-sectional study of a global online survey

Exploring Socioeconomic Status as a Global Determinant of COVID-19 Prevalence, Using Exploratory Data Analytic and Supervised Machine Learning Techniques: Algorithm Development and Validation Study

Identifying psychological predictors of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A machine learning study

Machine learning-enabled mental health risk prediction for youths with stressful life events: A modelling study

Prediction of Online Psychological Help-Seeking Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interpretable Machine Learning Method

Using machine learning to unveil relevant predictors of adherence to recommended health‐protective behaviors during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark

Identifying Predictors of Psychological Distress During COVID-19: A Machine Learning Approach

Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Depression Symptoms Among Chinese Healthcare Workers During the Early COVID-19 Outbreak in 2020: A Cross-Sectional Study

Machine learning for anxiety and depression profiling and risk assessment in the aftermath of an emergency

Learning the Mental Health Impact of COVID-19 in the United States With Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Observational Study

A machine learning analysis of COVID-19 mental health data

Predicting the Severity of Lockdown-Induced Psychiatric Symptoms with Machine Learning

Analyzing the Relationship Between COVID-19 and Sociodemographic and Environmental Factors: A Case Study in Toronto

Relationship matters: Using machine learning methods to predict the mental health severity of Chinese college freshmen during the pandemic period

Personalized Stratification of Hospitalization Risk Amidst COVID-19: A Machine Learning Approach.

Leveraging Social Media to Predict COVID-19-Induced Disruptions to Mental Well-Being Among University Students: Modeling Study