IQ After Pediatric Concussion

Ashley L Ware,Matthew J W McLarnon,Andrew P Lapointe,Brian L Brooks,Ann Bacevice,Barbara A Bangert,Miriam H Beauchamp,Erin D Bigler,Bruce Bjornson,Daniel M Cohen,William Craig,Quynh Doan,Stephen B Freedman,Bradley G Goodyear,Jocelyn Gravel,H Leslie K Mihalov,Nori Mercuri Minich,H Gerry Taylor,Roger Zemek,Keith Owen Yeates,Pediatric Emergency Research Canada A-CAP Study Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-060515
2023-08-01
PEDIATRICS
Abstract:Objectives: This study investigated IQ scores in pediatric concussion (ie, mild traumatic brain injury) versus orthopedic injury. Methods: Children (N = 866; aged 8-16.99 years) were recruited for 2 prospective cohort studies from emergency departments at children's hospitals (2 sites in the United States and 5 in Canada) ≤48 hours after sustaining a concussion or orthopedic injury. They completed IQ and performance validity testing postacutely (3-18 days postinjury; United States) or 3 months postinjury (Canada). Group differences in IQ scores were examined using 3 complementary statistical approaches (linear modeling, Bayesian, and multigroup factor analysis) in children performing above cutoffs on validity testing. Results: Linear models showed small group differences in full-scale IQ (d [95% confidence interval] = 0.13 [0.00-0.26]) and matrix reasoning (0.16 [0.03-0.30]), but not in vocabulary scores. IQ scores were not related to previous concussion, acute clinical features, injury mechanism, a validated clinical risk score, pre- or postinjury symptom ratings, litigation, or symptomatic status at 1 month postinjury. Bayesian models provided moderate to very strong evidence against group differences in IQ scores (Bayes factor 0.02-0.23). Multigroup factor analysis further demonstrated strict measurement invariance, indicating group equivalence in factor structure of the IQ test and latent variable means. Conclusions: Across multisite, prospective study cohorts, 3 complementary statistical models provided no evidence of clinically meaningful differences in IQ scores after pediatric concussion. Instead, overall results provided strong evidence against reduced intelligence in the first few weeks to months after pediatric concussion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?