Standardization of clinical outcomes used in allergen immunotherapy in allergic asthma: An EAACI position paper

Jasper Kappen,Zuzana Diamant,Ioana Agache,Matteo Bonini,Jean Bousquet,G Walter Canonica,Stephen R Durham,George V Guibas,Eckard Hamelmann,Marek Jutel,Nikolaos G Papadopoulos,Graham Roberts,Mohamed H Shamji,Petra Zieglmayer,Roy Gerth van Wijk,Oliver Pfaar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15817
IF: 12.4
Allergy
Abstract:Introduction: In allergic asthma patients, one of the more common phenotypes might benefit from allergen immunotherapy (AIT) as add-on intervention to pharmacological treatment. AIT is a treatment with disease-modifying modalities, the evidence for efficacy is based on controlled clinical trials following standardized endpoint measures. However, so far there is a lack of a consensus for asthma endpoints in AIT trials. The aim of a task force (TF) of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is evaluating several outcome measures for AIT in allergic asthma. Methods: The following domains of outcome measures in asthmatic patients have been evaluated for this position paper (PP): (i) exacerbation rate, (ii) lung function, (iii) ICS withdrawal, (iv) symptoms and rescue medication use, (v) questionnaires (PROMS), (vi) bronchial/nasal provocation, (vii) allergen exposure chambers (AEC) and (viii) biomarkers. Results: Exacerbation rate can be used as a reliable objective primary outcome; however, there is limited evidence due to different definitions of exacerbation. The time after ICS withdrawal to first exacerbation is considered a primary outcome measure. Besides, the advantages and disadvantages and clinical implications of further domains of asthma endpoints in AIT trials are elaborated in this PP. Conclusion: This EAACI-PP aims to highlight important aspects of current asthma measures by critically evaluating their applicability for controlled trials of AIT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?