Ensuring tympanostomy tube follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic

Gabriel Nahas,Rahul K Shah,Habib Zalzal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111653
Abstract:Objectives: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical practice was widespread. Local health restrictions in many communities limited the number and types of patients seen and treated. Our goal is to understand the discrepancies in follow-up for bilateral myringotomy with tubes (BMT) and understand whether the pandemic made it more difficult for certain patient populations to continue routine follow up. Methods: This cross-sectional study abstracted demographic and clinical data from the medical charts of randomized pediatric patients who underwent a BMT procedure between 2017 and 2022 at a tertiary pediatric academic care center site. Suboptimal follow-up was defined as no clinic visits within the first 6 months of surgery, and less than 3 follow-ups within a 24-month period after surgery. Data regarding secondary surgeries, clinical variables, race, zip code, and dates and number follow-ups were recorded from randomly chosen eligible charts. Complications were defined as need for revision surgery or development of post-tympanostomy sequalae such as perforation, cholesteatoma, or granuloma. Results: Pre-pandemic (N = 150) patients from 2017 to 2019 and post-pandemic (N = 150) patients from 2020 to 2022 cohorts were analyzed. No significant differences were identified between the groups regarding age, presence of combined surgery, anesthesia class, diagnosis, or race. There was no significant difference in rate of complications or need for revision surgery between either cohort nor when stratified for demographics. Conclusion: Limitations imposed upon medical care including outpatient clinics due COVID restrictions did not have an impact on tympanostomy tube follow-up regarding frequency of visits and risk of complication or revision surgery. Level of evidence: IV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?