Significance of neutrons from the atomic bomb at Hiroshima for revised radiation risk estimates.

D. Brenner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199103000-00014

1991-03-01

Health Physics

Abstract:RECENTLY, THERE has been a reassessment of the estimates of radiation doses absorbed by survivors of the atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Roesch 1987). This reassessment, termed “DS86,” is of importance because estimates of the biological hazards of ionizing radiation are primarily based on the life-span study (Shimizu et al. 1989, 1990) of cancer mortality in Hiroshima and Nagasaki (NRC 1990). One important aspect of the reassessment is the major reduction in estimated neutron doses at Hiroshima, compared with that suggested by the old “T65D” dosimetry (Milton and Shohoji 1968). Previously, the generally observed (Shimizu et al. 1989, 1990) increased risk (per unit dose) at Hiroshima compared with Nagasaki was attributed to neutrons (NRC 1980), which were considered a significant component of the dose at Hiroshima but not at Nagasaki. By comparing observed risks at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the neutrons compared to y rays could be estimated (NRC 1980). However, since the reassessed neutron doses at Hiroshima are much smaller, such RBE estimates have become extremely uncertain (Preston and Pierce 1988). Despite the almost order-of-magnitude reduction in the reassessed neutron doses at Hiroshima, it remains important to understand the RBE for neutrons at Hiroshima. This is because the new risk estimates for y rays still depend on the assumed RBE for neutrons; Fig. 1 illustrates how the recent BEIR V (NRC 1990) y-ray risk estimates, which were based on the new dosimetry, vary depending on the assumption made about the neutron RBE. An overall variation of about 40% can be seen here for a reasonable range of possible RBEs (see recent literature surveys; Sinclair 1982). In fact, a value of 20 was used in BEIR V (NRC 1990) to obtain the quoted risk estimates. In this note, we use general biophysical considerations to make a reasonable assessment of the neutron RBE