[Evaluation of dipstick for diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children and adults].

C. Latorre,M. Noguero,A. Miraa
Abstract:BACKGROUND Dipstick is used as a first test for screening urinary tract infection. MATERIAL AND METHOD 1087 urine samples from paediatric and adult patients were processed with dipstick and direct microscopic observation of pellet as well as of a Gram stain. A culture was also performed in all of them and was considered as the reference method in order to evaluate all other tests. RESULTS Sensitivity of dipstick and of Gram stain was higher in urines from adults than in those from children, but direct examination of pellet was better in paediatrics. Specificity of the three screening tests previous to culture presented few variations in both groups. Predictive positive value of dipstick and direct pellet was slightly better in children's urines; on the contrary, Gram stain was better in adults. Negative predictive value was similar for the three parameters. CONCLUSIONS The dipstick here evaluated is a good method for screening of urinary tract infection, though its positivity obliges to a bacteriologic follow up in order to get a certainty diagnosis. Nevertheless, in children less than 2 year old we recommend universal urine culture.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?