Abstract:figure legend Neural networks execute the transformation of inputs into the neural activity that enables the execution of a task. Thus, they have the potential to establish causal relationships between the input, the elements of a circuit, the network activity, and eventually behavior. When the purpose of building a model is to understand the mechanisms that enable behavior in biological circuits, the design of network models should be guided by three principles: (1) biological constraints are necessary (e.g., connectivity), (2) the network activity should match the recorded activity, and (3) the network should be able to perform the task of interest. Machine‐learning‐based training can help accomplish these goals. Due to the staggering complexity of the brain and its neural circuitry, neuroscientists rely on the analysis of mathematical models to elucidate its function. From Hodgkin and Huxley's detailed description of the action potential in 1952 to today, new theories and increasing computational power have opened up novel avenues to study how neural circuits implement the computations that underlie behavior. Computational neuroscientists have developed many models of neural circuits that differ in complexity, biological realism, or emergent network properties. With recent advances in experimental techniques for detailed anatomical reconstructions of large‐scale activity recordings, precise biological data has become more available. The challenge when building network models is to reflect experimental results, either through a high level of detail or by finding an appropriate level of abstraction. Meanwhile, machine learning has facilitated the development of artificial neural networks (ANN), which are trained to perform specific tasks. While they have proven successful at achieving task‐oriented behavior, they are often abstract constructs that differ in many features from the physiology of brain circuits. Thus, it is unclear whether the mechanisms underlying computation in biological circuits can be investigated by analyzing artificial networks that accomplish the same function but differ in their mechanisms. Here, we argue that building biologically realistic network models is crucial to establishing causal relationships between neurons, synapses, circuits, and behavior. More specifically, we advocate for network models that consider the connectivity structure and the recorded activity dynamics while evaluating task performance.

Normative and mechanistic model of an adaptive circuit for efficient encoding and feature extraction

Effect of Circuit Structure on Odor Representation in the Insect Olfactory System

A biological model of nonlinear dimensionality reduction

Short-Term Plasticity Regulates Both Divisive Normalization and Adaptive Responses in Drosophila Olfactory System.

Neural Circuit Inference from Function to Structure

Divergent short-term plasticity creates parallel pathways for computation and behavior in an olfactory circuit

Functional connectomics reveals general wiring rule in mouse visual cortex

Computing with a canonical neural circuits model with pool normalization and modulating feedback

Effects of short-term plasticity in early olfactory information processing in Drosophila

Explaining neuroplasticity using equivalent circuits: A mechanistic perspective

The sloppy relationship between neural circuit structure and function

Sparse coding and lateral inhibition arising from balanced and unbalanced dendrodendritic excitation and inhibition.

From deep learning to mechanistic understanding in neuroscience: the structure of retinal prediction

Recurrent connections enable point attractor dynamics and dimensionality reduction in a connectome-constrained model of the insect learning center

Data-driven modeling of the olfactory neural codes and their dynamics in the insect antennal lobe

The Neuron as a Direct Data-Driven Controller

A theoretical framework for analyzing coupled neuronal networks: Application to the olfactory system

How to incorporate biological insights into network models and why it matters

Deep inverse modeling reveals dynamic-dependent invariances in neural circuit mechanisms

Parallel and converging multisensory cascades in the Drosophila connectome