Determining 3D Distributions of Pulsatile Blood Flow Using Orthogonal Simultaneous Biplane High-Speed Angiography (SB-HSA) with 1000 fps CdTe Photon Counting Detectors for 3D X-ray Particle Image Velocimetry (3D-XPIV) compared to Results Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

X Simon Wu,A Shields,E Vanderbilt,S V Setlur Nagesh,C Ionita,D R Bednarek,S Rudin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2653617
Abstract:3D hemodynamic distributions are useful for the diagnosis and treatment of aneurysms. Detailed blood-flow patterns and derived velocity maps can be obtained using 1000 fps High Speed Angiography (HSA). The novel orthogonal Simultaneous Biplane High-Speed Angiography (SB-HSA) system enables flow information to be quantified in multiple planes, and with additional components of flow at depth, accurate 3D flow distributions are available. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is the current standard for derivation of volumetric flow distributions, but obtaining solution convergence is computationally expensive and time intensive. More importantly, matching in-vivo boundary conditions is non-trivial. Therefore, an experimentally derived 3D flow distribution method could offer realistic results with less computation time. Using SB-HSA image sequences, 3D X-Ray Particle Image Velocimetry (3D-XPIV) was explored as a new method for assessing 3D flow. 3D-XPIV was demonstrated using an in-vitro setup, where a patient-specific internal carotid artery aneurysm model was attached to a flow loop, and an automated injection of iodinated microspheres was used as a flow tracer. Two 1000 fps photon-counting detectors were placed orthogonally with the aneurysm model in the FOV of both planes. Frame-synchronization of the two detectors made correlation of single-particle velocity components at a given timepoint possible. With frame-rates of 1000 fps, small particle displacements between frames resolved realistic time varying flow, where accurate velocity distributions depended on near-instantaneous velocities. 3D-XPIV velocity distributions were compared to CFD velocity distributions, where the simulation boundary conditions matched the in-vitro setup. Results showed similar velocity distributions between CFD and 3D-XPIV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?