Abstract:Introduction Vulvodynia is a chronic vulvar pain condition that affects 8-10% of women and people with vulvas. Despite its prevalence, healthcare providers (HCPs) often lack awareness, knowledge, and confidence in managing vulvodynia. This knowledge gap can lead to diagnostic delays, misdiagnoses, and reflex referrals to specialists. Moreover, research shows that patients feel invalidated in healthcare settings and perceive that their HCPs' lack of vulvodynia awareness negatively impacts their care. Thus, there is a need for educational resources about vulvodynia that can be applied in healthcare settings. Specifically, community-based primary care providers could greatly benefit from vulvodynia resources because they are often a point of entry into the healthcare system. Objective To develop and test a new, online toolkit tailored to supporting community-based primary care providers with the assessment, diagnosis, and management of vulvodynia. In this pilot study, we sought to evaluate the adoption, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the vulvodynia toolkit in a pilot sample of community-based family physicians. Methods A working group of HCPs (family physicians, gynecologists, physiotherapist, psychologists) and patient partners with vulvodynia expertise developed the toolkit. The toolkit was designed in an online, modular format that could be integrated into short healthcare visits. A sample of 19 family physicians completed online surveys before and after piloting the toolkit in their community practice for 6 months. Adoption was measured in the post-toolkit survey by assessing the frequency and timing of toolkit use during the pilot period. Acceptability was measured in the post-toolkit survey by assessing physicians' satisfaction with the toolkit content and quality. Preliminary efficacy was assessed by comparing physicians' self-reported level of confidence with diagnosing, treating, and supporting patients with vulvodynia before and after the pilot period. Results Adoption. During the pilot period, physicians used the toolkit in advance of patient appointments (52.6%), during patient appointments (5.3%), or used a combination of both timepoints (42.1%). Over the 6-month pilot period, physicians used the toolkit an average of 2.61 times (SD = 1.50) in advance of seeing patients and 1.63 times (SD = 2.19) during patient appointments. Acceptability. Most physicians reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the toolkit overall (79.0%) and that it contained the right amount of information (68.4%). On average, the physicians rated their likelihood of recommending the toolkit to a colleague as 8/10 (SD = 1.75). Preliminary efficacy. Using repeated-measures MANOVAs, we found significant pre-toolkit to post-toolkit increases in physician's confidence for diagnosing vulvodynia, p = .003, ηp 2 = .59, treating vulvodynia, p < .001, ηp2 = .72, and supporting patients with vulvodynia, p < .001, ηp2 = .73. Conclusions In this pilot study, we developed and tested an online vulvodynia toolkit tailored to educating community-based primary care providers. The toolkit demonstrated high acceptability and preliminary efficacy amongst a pilot group of family physicians, with large effect sizes. The results of this study exemplify the value of tailored education for improving physicians' confidence with managing vulvodynia in community practice and lay the foundation for upscaling this tool to a wider population of HCPs. Disclosure No.

The impact of rurality on vulvodynia diagnosis and management: Primary care provider and patient perspectives

(025) Developing And Testing An Online Primary Care Toolkit For Community Management Of Vulvodynia

Exploring the health care experiences of women diagnosed with vulvodynia.

Improving the response of primary care providers to rural First Nation women who experience intimate partner violence: a qualitative study

A scoping review: the psychosocial barriers that exist for people with vulvodynia

Beyond vulvodynia: from a correct diagnosis to a multidisciplinary care program. A referral center experience

Lived experience of medical management in recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a qualitative study of an uncertain journey

The landscape of non-psychotic psychiatric illness in rural Canada: a narrative review

(350) Assessment of Fundamental Knowledge and Comfortability of Medical Trainees in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Genito-pelvic Pain Penetration Disorder

Causes of Unwarranted Variation and Disparity in Breast Cancer Management in Regional and Rural Area

Management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis: Narrative review of the literature and European expert panel opinion

Symptoms, attitudes and treatment perceptions of vulvo-vaginal atrophy in UK postmenopausal women: Results from the REVIVE-EU study

Uncovering gaps in management of vasomotor symptoms: findings from a national need assessment

WISDOM survey: attitudes and behaviors of physicians toward vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) treatment in women including those with breast cancer history

Living and working in rural healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of rural family physicians' lived experiences

Psychiatric morbidity across the life course and provoked vulvodynia: is it dependent upon the presence of non-stress-related immune dysfunction?

Experiences of patients with bladder cancer: A comparison of urban and rural areas.

Addressing vulvodynia in a chronic pelvic pain unit, does it make any difference?

Virtual care and COVID-19: A survey study of adoption, satisfaction and continuing education preferences of healthcare providers in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Rural patients’ experiences with anesthesia and surgical consultations in British Columbia: A survey-based comparison between virtual and in-person modalities

The impact of internet connectivity when conducting a virtual clinical trial with participants living in rural areas