Abstract:Fear learning allows us to identify and anticipate aversive events and adapt our behavior accordingly. This is often thought to rely on associative learning mechanisms where an initially neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) is repeatedly paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US), eventually leading to the CS also being perceived as aversive and threatening. Importantly, however, humans also show verbal fear learning. Namely, they have the ability to change their responses to stimuli rapidly through verbal instructions about CS-US pairings. Past research on the link between experience-based and verbal fear learning indicated that verbal instructions about a reversal of CS-US pairings can fully override the effects of previously experienced CS-US pairings, as measured through fear ratings, skin conductance, and fear-potentiated startle. However, it remains an open question whether such instructions can also annul learned CS representations in the brain. Here, we used a fear reversal paradigm (female and male participants) in conjunction with representational similarity analysis of fMRI data to test whether verbal instructions fully override the effects of experienced CS-US pairings in fear-related brain regions or not. Previous research suggests that only the right amygdala should show lingering representations of previously experienced threat ("pavlovian trace"). Unexpectedly, we found evidence for the residual effect of prior CS-US experience to be much more widespread than anticipated, in the amygdala but also cortical regions like the dorsal anterior cingulate or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. This finding shines a new light on the interaction of different fear learning mechanisms, at times with unexpected consequences.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans are able to learn about aversive stimuli both from experience (i.e., repeated pairings of conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US; pavlovian conditioning), and from verbal instructions about stimulus pairings. Understanding how experience-based and verbal learning processes interact is key for understanding the cognitive and neural underpinnings of fear learning. We tested whether prior aversive experiences (CS-US pairings) affected subsequent verbal learning, searching for lingering threat signals after verbal instructions reversed a CS from being threatening to being safe. While past research suggested such threat signals can only be found in the amygdala, we found evidence to be much more widespread, including the medial and lateral PFC. This highlights how experience-based and verbal learning processes interact to support adaptive behavior.

Effects of Experiencing CS-US Pairings on Instructed Fear Reversal

The Impact of Continuous and Partial Reinforcement on the Acquisition and Generalization of Human-Conditioned Fear

Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans

Distinct representational properties of cues and contexts shape fear learning and extinction

Learning-Induced Changes in mPFC–BLA Connections After Fear Conditioning, Extinction, and Reinstatement of Fear

Effects of verbal instructions and physical threat removal prior to extinction training on the return of conditioned fear

Role of Human Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Learning and Recall of Enhanced Extinction

Survival of the salient: Aversive learning rescues otherwise forgettable memories via neural reactivation and post-encoding hippocampal connectivity

Effect of continuous and partial reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of human conditioned fear.

Impact of Observational and Direct Learning on Fear Conditioning and Generalization in Humans

Imagery rescripting and extinction: Effects on US expectancy, US revaluation, and the generalization of fear reduction

Neural adaptation of cingulate and insular activity during delayed fear extinction: A replicable pattern across assessment sites and repeated measurements

Auditory stimuli suppress contextual fear responses in safety learning independent of a possible safety meaning

The Role of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex in the Conditioning and Extinction of Fear

Ecological analysis of Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats

Suppressing fear in the presence of a safety cue requires infralimbic cortical signaling to central amygdala

An Unconditioned Stimulus Retrieval Extinction Procedure to Prevent the Return of Fear Memory.

Instructed Knowledge Shapes Feedback-Driven Aversive Learning in Striatum and Orbitofrontal Cortex, but Not the Amygdala.

Contextual modulation of human associative learning following novelty-facilitated extinction, counterconditioning, and conventional extinction.

State- and circuit-dependent opponent-processing of fear

The influence of repetitive thoughts of CS-US pairing on expectancy learning and evaluative conditioning: a fundamental study