Abstract:Without strong evidence of benefit, the use of carotid endarterectomy for prophylaxis against stroke rose dramatically until the mid-1980s, then declined. Our investigation sought to determine whether carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke among patients with a recent adverse cerebrovascular event and ipsilateral carotid stenosis. We conducted a randomized trial at 50 clinical centers throughout the United States and Canada, in patients in two predetermined strata based on the severity of carotid stenosis—30%–69% and 70%–99%. We report here the results in the 659 patients in the latter stratum, who had had a hemispheric or retinal transient ischemic attack or a nondisabling stroke within the 120 days before entry and had stenosis of 70%–99% in the symptomatic carotid artery. All patients received optimal medical care, including antiplatelet therapy. Those assigned to surgical treatment underwent carotid endarterectomy performed by neurosurgeons or vascular surgeons. All patients were examined by neurologists 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after entry and then every 4 months. Endpoints were assessed by blinded, independent case review. No patient was lost to follow-up. Life-table estimates of the cumulative risk of any ipsilateral stroke at 2 years were 26% in the 331 medical patients and 9% in the 328 surgical patients—an absolute risk reduction (+/- SE) 17% +/- 3.5% (P less than 0.001). For a major or fatal ipsilateral stroke, the corresponding estimates were 13.1% and 2.5%—an absolute risk reduction of 10.6% +/- 2.6% (P less than 0.001). Carotid endarterectomy was still found to be beneficial when all strokes and deaths were included in the analysis (P less than 0.001). Carotid endarterectomy is highly beneficial to patients with recent hemispheric and retinal transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling strokes and ipsilateral high-grade stenosis (70%–99%) of the internal carotid artery. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is highly beneficial to patients with recent hemispheric and retinal transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling strokes and ipsilateral high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. The precise role and methods of carotid stenting are currently under clinical investigation. The lesson of how comparative, randomized clinical trials established the value of CEA, if followed, will provide reliable future guidelines. The benefit of CEA may be greater if an operation is performed soon after the transient ischemic event. A retrospective review of clinical outcome at the Mayo Clinic showed that CEA can be done with “acceptable risk in properly selected symptomatic patients within 2 weeks” of the transient ischemic attack. In the 1980s, neurologists and internists became concerned about the results of CEA, particularly the varying indications for operation and reports of high levels of postoperative complications.

A comparative effectiveness study of carotid intervention for long-term stroke prevention in patients with severe asymptomatic stenosis from a large integrated health system

[A Single Center Large Cohort Study on Perioperative Complications of Carotid Endarterectomy of 547 Cases].

Outcome Differences Between Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) and Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) in Postoperative Ventricular Arrhythmia, Neurological Complications, and In-Hospital Mortality

Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of long-term results of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis

Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis

Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis: A national cohort study

Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in the Treatment of Carotid Stenosis

Comparison the effects of carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting for contralateral carotid occlusion

Comparison of Long Term Prognosis between Carotid Endarterectomy versus Stenting; A Korean Population-Based Study Using National Insurance Data

Comparison of carotid artery endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic carotid stenosis.

Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy in the Treatment of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Endarterectomy and Stenting for High-risk Carotid Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Perioperative and follow-up results of Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with carotid near-occlusion.

Outcomes of Preferential Early Carotid Endarterectomy following Recent Stroke

The mid-term results of the Carotid Asymptomatic Stenosis (CARAS) observational study

Procedural Safety Comparison Between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Carotid Endarterectomy, and Carotid Stenting: Perioperative and 1-Year Rates of Stroke or Death

Comparison of domain-specific cognitive function after carotid endarterectomy and stenting

Long-Term Mortality and Morbidity after Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

[Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Stenting: a Prospective Randomized Trial].

Systematic and Comprehensive Comparison of Incidence of Restenosis Between Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Atherosclerotic Carotid Stenosis