Abstract:Without strong evidence of benefit, the use of carotid endarterectomy for prophylaxis against stroke rose dramatically until the mid-1980s, then declined. Our investigation sought to determine whether carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke among patients with a recent adverse cerebrovascular event and ipsilateral carotid stenosis. We conducted a randomized trial at 50 clinical centers throughout the United States and Canada, in patients in two predetermined strata based on the severity of carotid stenosis—30%–69% and 70%–99%. We report here the results in the 659 patients in the latter stratum, who had had a hemispheric or retinal transient ischemic attack or a nondisabling stroke within the 120 days before entry and had stenosis of 70%–99% in the symptomatic carotid artery. All patients received optimal medical care, including antiplatelet therapy. Those assigned to surgical treatment underwent carotid endarterectomy performed by neurosurgeons or vascular surgeons. All patients were examined by neurologists 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after entry and then every 4 months. Endpoints were assessed by blinded, independent case review. No patient was lost to follow-up. Life-table estimates of the cumulative risk of any ipsilateral stroke at 2 years were 26% in the 331 medical patients and 9% in the 328 surgical patients—an absolute risk reduction (+/- SE) 17% +/- 3.5% (P less than 0.001). For a major or fatal ipsilateral stroke, the corresponding estimates were 13.1% and 2.5%—an absolute risk reduction of 10.6% +/- 2.6% (P less than 0.001). Carotid endarterectomy was still found to be beneficial when all strokes and deaths were included in the analysis (P less than 0.001). Carotid endarterectomy is highly beneficial to patients with recent hemispheric and retinal transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling strokes and ipsilateral high-grade stenosis (70%–99%) of the internal carotid artery. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is highly beneficial to patients with recent hemispheric and retinal transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling strokes and ipsilateral high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. The precise role and methods of carotid stenting are currently under clinical investigation. The lesson of how comparative, randomized clinical trials established the value of CEA, if followed, will provide reliable future guidelines. The benefit of CEA may be greater if an operation is performed soon after the transient ischemic event. A retrospective review of clinical outcome at the Mayo Clinic showed that CEA can be done with “acceptable risk in properly selected symptomatic patients within 2 weeks” of the transient ischemic attack. In the 1980s, neurologists and internists became concerned about the results of CEA, particularly the varying indications for operation and reports of high levels of postoperative complications.

The dangerous needles in the haystack of sore throats.

[A Single Center Large Cohort Study on Perioperative Complications of Carotid Endarterectomy of 547 Cases].

Outcome Differences Between Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) and Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) in Postoperative Ventricular Arrhythmia, Neurological Complications, and In-Hospital Mortality

Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lipoxin A4 antagonizes the mitogenic effects of leukotriene D4 in human renal mesangial cells. Differential activation of MAP kinases through distinct receptors.

Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis

Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis: A national cohort study

Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in the Treatment of Carotid Stenosis

Symmetric, Isotopic Blends of Poly(dimethylsiloxane)

Comparison of Long Term Prognosis between Carotid Endarterectomy versus Stenting; A Korean Population-Based Study Using National Insurance Data

Comparison of carotid artery endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic carotid stenosis.

Comparison of Endarterectomy and Stenting for High-risk Carotid Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Perioperative and follow-up results of Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with carotid near-occlusion.

Outcomes of Preferential Early Carotid Endarterectomy following Recent Stroke

The mid-term results of the Carotid Asymptomatic Stenosis (CARAS) observational study

[Sequelae after successful treatment of ALL in childhood and adolescence: follow-up is precautionary].

Quantitative ester analysis in cachaca and distilled spirits by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Long-Term Mortality and Morbidity after Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

[Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Stenting: a Prospective Randomized Trial].

Systematic and Comprehensive Comparison of Incidence of Restenosis Between Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Atherosclerotic Carotid Stenosis

Editor's Choice - Comparison of Early Outcomes and Restenosis Rate Between Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis