Abstract:In recent years collaborative robots have become major market drivers in industry 5.0, which aims to incorporate them alongside humans in a wide array of settings ranging from welding to rehabilitation. Improving human-machine collaboration entails using computational algorithms that will save processing as well as communication cost. In this study we have constructed an agent that can choose when to cooperate using an optimal strategy. The agent was designed to operate in the context of divergent interest tacit coordination games in which communication between the players is not possible and the payoff is not symmetric. The agent's model was based on a behavioral model that can predict the probability of a player converging on prominent solutions with salient features (e.g., focal points) based on the player's Social Value Orientation (SVO) and the specific game features. The SVO theory pertains to the preferences of decision makers when allocating joint resources between themselves and another player in the context of behavioral game theory. The agent selected stochastically between one of two possible policies, a greedy or a cooperative policy, based on the probability of a player to converge on a focal point. The distribution of the number of points obtained by the autonomous agent incorporating the SVO in the model was better than the results obtained by the human players who played against each other (i.e., the distribution associated with the agent had a higher mean value). Moreover, the distribution of points gained by the agent was better than any of the separate strategies the agent could choose from, namely, always choosing a greedy or a focal point solution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to construct an intelligent agent that maximizes its utility by incorporating the belief system of the player in the context of tacit bargaining. This reward-maximizing strategy selection process based on the SVO can also be potentially applied in other human-machine contexts, including multiagent systems.

Empirical game-theoretic analysis of the TAC Supply Chain game

Empirical Game-Theoretic Analysis: A Survey

Ancillary Mechanism for Autonomous Decision-Making Process in Asymmetric Confrontation: a View from Gomoku

Supply chain decision making with use of game theory

An analysis of supply chain game model with a third party logistics service provider involved

Game-Theoretic Analysis of Adversarial Decision Making in a Complex Sociophysical System

Game Theoretic Applications in Supply Chain Management: A Review

A Generalised Method for Empirical Game Theoretic Analysis

Exploiting Extensive-Form Structure in Empirical Game-Theoretic Analysis

TacTex'13: A Champion Adaptive Power Trading Agent

Dynamic Operational Planning in Warfare: A Stochastic Game Approach to Military Campaigns

Game theory in supply chain management: current trends and applications

Competing Mechanisms in Games Played Through Agents: Theory and Experiment

Receding Horizon Games for Modeling Competitive Supply Chains

Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions

Game-Theoretic Analysis of Adversarial Decision Making in a Complex Socio-Physical System

Using a Stochastic Agent Model to Optimize Performance in Divergent Interest Tacit Coordination Games

Supply chain coordination: A game-theory approach

Price Prediction in a Trading Agent Competition

Cracking the Bullwhip: Team Collaboration and Performance within a Simulated Supply Chain

Game-Theoretic Model and Experimental Investigation of Cyber Wargaming