Abstract:Precision reaching often requires corrective submovements to obtain the desired goal. Most studies of reaching have focused on single initial movements, and implied the cortical encoding model was the same for all submovements. However, corrective submovements may show different encoding patterns from the initial submovement with distinct patterns of activation across the population. Two rhesus macaques performed a precision center-out-task with small targets. Neural activity from single units in the primary motor cortex and associated behavioral data were recorded to evaluate movement characteristics. Neural population data and individual neuronal firing rates identified with a peak finding algorithm to identify peaks in hand speed were examined for encoding differences between initial and corrective submovements. Individual neurons were fitted with a regression model that included the reach vector, position, and speed to predict firing rate. For both initial and corrective submovements, the largest effect remained movement direction. We observed a large subset changed their preferred direction greater than 45° between initial and corrective submovements. Neuronal depth of modulation also showed considerable variation when adjusted for movement speed. By using principal component analysis, neural trajectories of initial and corrective submovements progressed through different neural subspaces. These findings all suggest that different neural encoding patterns exist for initial and corrective submovements within the cortex. We hypothesize that this variation in how neurons change to encode small, corrective submovements might allow for a larger portion of the neural space being used to encode a greater range of movements with varying amplitudes and levels of precision.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Neuronal recordings matched with kinematic behavior were collected in a precision center-out task that often required corrective movements. We reveal large differences in preferred direction and depth of modulation between initial and corrective submovements across the neural population. We then present a model of the neural population describing how these shifts in tuning create different subspaces for signaling initial and corrective movements likely to improve motor precision.

Reach Corrections Toward Moving Objects are Faster Than Reach Corrections Toward Instantaneously Switching Targets

Pointing Accurately at a Target Doesn't Require Perceiving Its Location Accurately

Spatial Information is Exploited to Adjust Hand Movement when Hitting Moving Target

Spatial Accuracy of Predictive Saccades Determines the Performance of Continuous Visuomotor Action

Stable visually guided reaching does not require an internal feedforward model to compensate for internal delay: Data and model

Short-Term Modulation of Online Monocular Visuomotor Function

Initial and corrective submovement encoding differences within primary motor cortex during precision reaching

Fast prediction in marmoset reach-to-grasp movements for dynamic prey

Switching between two targets with non‐constant velocity profiles reveals shared internal model of target motion

Visuomotor Adaptation and Sensory Recalibration in Reversed Hand Movement Task.

Motor, not visual, encoding of potential reach targets

Body-Related Visual Biasing Affects Accuracy of Reaching

Preparatory activity in premotor and motor cortex reflects the speed of the upcoming reach

Factors governing the assignment of visual consequence to the corresponding action

Visuo-proprioceptive recalibration and the sensorimotor map

The planning and control of reaching movements

Rapid Online Corrections for Proprioceptive and Visual Perturbations Recruit Similar Circuits in Primary Motor Cortex

Eye tracking a self-moved target with complex hand-target dynamics

Eye-hand coordination in finding and touching a target among distractors

Incomplete adaptation to surface movement during hand reaching

Instruction Alters the Influence of Allocentric Landmarks in a Reach Task