Non‐invasive candidate protein signature predicts hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction in cirrhotic patients after sustained virologic response
Shola M. Richards,Fang Guo,Heng Zou,Florian Nigsch,Anna Baiges,Alok Pachori,Yiming Zhang,Sabela Lens,Rebecca Pitts,Nancy Finkel,Joseph Loureiro,Dale Mongeon,Shenglin Ma,Mollie Watkins,Florine Polus,Agustin Albillos,Luis Tellez,Javier Martinez‐González,Rafael Bañares,Fanny Turon,José Ferrusquía‐Acosta,Valeria Perez‐Campuzano,Marta Magaz,Xavier Forns,Michael Badman,Andreas W. Sailer,Chinweike Ukomadu,Virginia Hernández‐Gea,Juan Carlos Garcia‐Pagán
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.15657
IF: 8.754
2023-07-14
Liver International
Abstract:Background and Aims A reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the most accurate marker for assessing the severity of portal hypertension and the effectiveness of intervention treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic potential of blood‐based proteomic biomarkers in predicting HVPG response amongst cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension due to Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and had achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). Methods The study comprised 59 patients from two cohorts. Patients underwent paired HVPG (pretreatment and after SVR), liver stiffness (LSM), and enhanced liver fibrosis scores (ELF) measurements, as well as proteomics‐based profiling on serum samples using SomaScan® at baseline (BL) and after SVR (EOS). Machine learning with feature selection (Caret, Random Forest and RPART) methods were performed to determine the proteins capable of classifying HVPG responders. Model performance was evaluated using AUROC (pROC R package). Results Patients were stratified by a change in HVPG (EOS vs. BL) into responders (greater than 20% decline in HVPG from BL, or 10 mmHg at BL) and non‐responders. LSM and ELF decreased markedly after SVR but did not correlate with HVPG response. SomaScan (SomaLogic, Inc., Boulder, CO) analysis revealed a substantial shift in the peripheral proteome composition, reflected by 82 significantly differentially abundant proteins. Twelve proteins accurately distinguished responders from non‐responders, with an AUROC of .86, sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 83%, accuracy of 83%, PPV of 83%, and NPV of 83%. Conclusions A combined non‐invasive soluble protein signature was identified, capable of accurately predicting HVPG response in HCV liver cirrhosis patients after achieving SVR.
gastroenterology & hepatology