Abstract:Background: To compare surgical outcomes after mitral valve replacement via either minimally invasive thoracoscopic (MIs) or traditional median sternotomy (MS) surgery and determine the short- and mid-term clinical outcomes of the MI approach. Methods: All patients who received either MIs (n=405) or MS (n=691) mitral valve replacement surgery at the Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute between January 2012 and July 2015 were analyzed for outcome differences due to surgical approach using propensity score matching. The best 202 matches from the MI group and the MS group were analyzed. The clinical data of the two groups were collected, including preoperative cardiac function, operative data, postoperative complications, and follow-up. Results: A final total of 404 patients were included in this study after propensity score matching; the MIs group and the MS group each contained 202 patients. The two groups were similar in age, weight, pathological changes, and surgical approach. Compared with the MS group, the MIs group had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (P<0.001), aortic cross-clamping time (P<0.001), and total procedure time (P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding in-hospital mortality, stroke, pneumonia, acute renal failure, arrhythmia, and chylothorax. The MS group had significantly more patients with poor wound healing than the MIs group (P=0.004). The MI group had a lower rate of transfusion (P=0.037), shorter ventilation time (P=0.041), shorter ICU stay (P=0.033), reduced chest tube drainage and length of chest tube stay (P<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in hospital re-admission for bleeding, but the total hospitalization cost was higher in the MIs group (P=0.002). The mean follow-up was 26.59±12.33 months, the 1-year postoperative survival rate was 98.86%, and the overall survival rate was 97.44%. Compared with the MS group, the MIs group recovered earlier (P<0.05), and returned to work or study earlier (P<0.05). More patients in the MIs group were satisfied with the wound (P<0.001). The MS group had a higher incidence of postoperative osteomyelitis than the MIs group (P=0.028). There were no significant differences between groups in rates of mortality, stroke, pacemaker, reoperation, or 36-item Short Form Health Survey score. Conclusions: Compared with the MS approach, the MIs method of mitral valve replacement has longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time; however, it does not increase the risk of mortality and complications. Furthermore, MIs causes less trauma, fewer transfusions, less wound infection, faster recovery, faster return to work or study, and greater satisfaction with the incision in the mid-term. MI cardiac surgery is safe, effective, and feasible.

Toward Global Measurement of the Information Society: a U.S.-China Comparison of National Government Surveys

Semipreparative isolation of dehydrodiferulic and dehydrotriferulic acids as standard substances from maize bran.

Sex-Based Differences in Early Outcomes Following Mitral Valve Surgery for Degenerative Disease

Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes After Mitral Valve Surgery for Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: From the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network

Sex Differences in Epidemiological Distribution and Outcomes of Surgical Mitral Valve Disease

Mitral valve replacement via minimally invasive totally thoracoscopic surgery versus traditional median sternotomy: a propensity score matched comparative study

Measurement and characterization of postischemic free radical generation in the isolated perfused heart.

Presentation and outcomes of women and men undergoing surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Isolate Mitral Valve Repair Through Minimal Invasive Versus Median Sternotomy Ap-Proach: a Propensity-Matched Analysis

Soft tissue inflammation: presenting feature of Crohn's disease in a cystic fibrosis adolescent.

Impact of female sex in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Long-term outcomes

Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve– or Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Gender Differences in 381 Patients Undergoing Isolated Mitral Regurgitation Repair

Sex-Specific Prognosis of Left Ventricular Size and Function Following Repair of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Two books about Great Lakes invasions

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Aortic Annuli: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Gender-Based Outcomes

Sex-related differences among patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement-a propensity score matched study

A sex-specific comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Sex disparities in outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation- a multi-year propensity-matched nationwide study

Minimally invasive vs. conventional mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Surface modification of PCC with guar gum using organic titanium ionic crosslinking agent and its application as papermaking filler.