Abstract:Abstract Objective Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) professionals increasingly need to assess and mitigate a broad scope of worker safety, health, and well-being concerns that extend beyond traditional OSH training curricula. Work-related and non-work-related psychosocial hazards, chronic physical and mental health conditions, and changing work arrangements call for an integrative, public health approach to occupational risk management; this approach has been called, “Total Worker Health®” by United States public health authorities (Schulte et al. 2019). OSH professionals need education to ensure that Total Worker Health (TWH) practice approaches are consistently and effectively applied. This study sought to develop a valid, reliable scale that could be used to assess TWH skills gaps that can be addressed with tailored, competency-based curricula. Method We developed a survey scale to assess professional competency for specific TWH practice approaches described in prior literature (Lee et al. 2016; Punnett et al. 2020). The scale contained 11 statements and used a 5-point scale (not skilled to highly skilled) to rate the level of competency. We pre-tested and refined the statements for face validity then administered the scale with a convenience sample of 258 professionals from mixed OSH disciplines. A total of 210 OSH professionals (31% safety, 17% industrial hygiene, 12% occupational nurses, 11% occupational physicians, 29% other) who completed 50% or more of the questions were included in the analysis. Scale reliability was assessed with a Cronbach’s alpha test. Scale validity and structure were assessed with exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Results The 11-item scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). The initial EFA solution suggested 2 factors that explained 65.3% of variance, with one cross-loaded question. A final 10-item, 2-factor scale was developed that accounted for 66.0% of variance with no cross-loaded items (Cronbach’s alpha α = 0.91). Factor 1 (6 items) contributed to 55.5% of the variance and captured skills related to TWH program leadership (e.g. leader commitment, integrating program systems, engaging with other program leaders and workers). Factor 2 (4 items) contributed to 10.5% of the variance and captured technical skills related to hazard identification and control (e.g. identifying hazards, designing work to reduce hazards). Internal consistency was very good for both TWH program leadership (Cronbach α = 0.89) and TWH risk assessment and control (Cronbach α = 0.80) subscales. Conclusion A novel 10-item TWH skill scale to assess specific TWH practice approaches was developed with very good reliability. Factor analysis revealed 2 latent constructs: TWH leadership skills and TWH risk assessment and control skills. This study offers an evidence-based tool to assess competency for specific TWH practices among OSH professionals. The results of this study contribute to the broader research base needed to formalize a TWH competency framework, as advocated by other scholars interested in TWH workforce education (Newman et al. 2020).

Measuring Health Care Work-Related Contextual Factors: Development of the McGill Context Tool

The Definitions and Conceptualizations of the Practice Context in the Health Professions: A Scoping Review

Development and testing of an instrument to measure contextual factors influencing self-care decisions among adults with chronic illness

Developing a Tool to Assess the Quality of Socio-Demographic Data in Community Health Centres

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument to Assess Cross-Cultural Competence of Healthcare Professionals (CCCHP)

Development and validation of the mental health professional culture inventory

Capturing motivating versus demotivating self-management support: Development and validation of a vignette-based tool grounded in Self-determination Theory

Development and validation of a Context-sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ): A factor analysis and multivariate regression study

Development and psychometric evaluation of a Total Worker Health ® practice scale

Development and Validation of the Chronic Condition Physician-Patient Relationship Scale (CC-PPR): A patient-informed measurement tool.

Development of a Research Tool to Document Self-Reported Chronic Conditions in Primary Care

Measuring quality of life at work for healthcare and social services workers: A systematic review of available instruments

A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review

Development of a brief learning environment measure for use in healthcare professions education: the Healthcare Education Micro Learning Environment Measure (HEMLEM)

Measuring effectiveness of cultural safety education in First Peoples health in university and health service settings

Using Focus Groups to Modify the Workplace Affective Commitment Multidimensional Questionnaire (WACMQ) for use in Health Care

Measuring the work environment among healthcare professionals: Validation of the Dutch version of the Culture of Care Barometer

Validation of the compassionate engagement and action scales, compassion scale, and Sussex-Oxford compassion scales in a French-Canadian sample

Response process and test-retest reliability of the Context Assessment for Community Health tool in Vietnam

Development and Content Validation of an Instrument to Measure Medication Self-Management in Older Adults

Pragmatic adaptation of implementation research measures for a novel context and multiple professional roles: a factor analysis study