Safety profile of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors with concurrent radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Carlotta Becherini,Luca Visani,Saverio Caini,Indrani S Bhattacharya,Anna M Kirby,Gustavo Nader Marta,Gilberto Morgan,Viola Salvestrini,Charlotte E Coles,Javier Cortes,Giuseppe Curigliano,Evandro de Azambuja,Nadia Harbeck,Clare M Isacke,Orit Kaidar-Person,Elisabetta Marangoni,Birgitte Offersen,Hope S Rugo,Andrea Morandi,Matteo Lambertini,Philip Poortmans,Lorenzo Livi,Icro Meattini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102586
Abstract:The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer, improving survival outcomes compared to endocrine therapy alone. Abemaciclib and ribociclib, in combination with endocrine therapy, have demonstrated significant benefits in invasive disease-free survival for high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients. Each CDK4/6i-palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib-exhibits distinct toxicity profiles. Radiation therapy (RT) can be delivered with a palliative or ablative intent, particularly using stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. However, pivotal randomized trials lack information on concomitant CDK4/6i and RT, and existing preclinical and clinical data on the potential combined toxicities are limited and conflicting. As part of a broader effort to establish international consensus recommendations for integrating RT and targeted agents in breast cancer treatment, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety profile of combining CDK4/6i with palliative and ablative RT in both metastatic and early breast cancer settings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?