Antidonor T-Cell Responses Are Not Attenuated in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients

Yu Sasaki,Kentaro Ide,Yuka Tanaka,Asuka Tanaka,Shuji Akimoto,Hiroyuki Tahara,Masahiro Ohira,Naoki Tanimine,Marlen Doskali,Hideki Ohdan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2023.0014
Abstract:Objectives: Although the number of kidney transplants among elderly patients has been steadily increasing, no specific recommendations have been established for treatment of elderly patients. In general, elderly recipients are considered to be at lower risk of cell rejection and require less intense immunosuppression than younger recipients. However, a recent report from Japan reported that chronic T-cell-mediated rejection was more frequent in elderly living-donor kidney transplant recipients. In this study, we investigated the effects of aging on antidonor T-cell responses in living-donor kidney transplantrecipients. Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 70 adultliving-donor kidney transplantrecipients with negative crossmatches and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens. To evaluate antidonor T-cell responses, serial mixed lymphocyte reaction assays were performed.We compared results in elderly (≥65 years) versus nonelderly recipients. Results: Regarding donor characteristics, elderly recipients were more likely than nonelderly recipients to receive a transplant from their spouse. The number of mismatches at the HLA-DRB1 loci was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the nonelderly group. As a result, the proportion of patients with antidonor hyporesponsiveness in the elderly group did not increase over the postoperative course. Conclusions: Antidonor T-cell responses in elderly living-donor kidney transplant recipients were not attenuated over time. Thus, caution is required regarding the imprudent reduction of immunosuppressants in elderly living-donor kidney transplant recipients. A rigorously designed, large-scale, prospective study is required to validate these results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?