Moves you shouldn't make.

D. Murray

2003-02-07

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Privacy versus Public Health? A Reassessment of Centralised and Decentralised Digital Contact Tracing

Lucie White,Philippe van Basshuysen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00301-0

IF: 3.777

2021-03-29

Science and Engineering Ethics

Abstract:Abstract At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, high hopes were placed on digital contact tracing. Digital contact tracing apps can now be downloaded in many countries, but as further waves of COVID-19 tear through much of the northern hemisphere, these apps are playing a less important role in interrupting chains of infection than anticipated. We argue that one of the reasons for this is that most countries have opted for decentralised apps, which cannot provide a means of rapidly informing users of likely infections while avoiding too many false positive reports. Centralised apps, in contrast, have the potential to do this. But policy making was influenced by public debates about the right app configuration, which have tended to focus heavily on privacy, and are driven by the assumption that decentralised apps are “privacy preserving by design”. We show that both types of apps are in fact vulnerable to privacy breaches, and, drawing on principles from safety engineering and risk analysis, compare the risks of centralised and decentralised systems along two dimensions, namely the probability of possible breaches and their severity. We conclude that a centralised app may in fact minimise overall ethical risk, and contend that we must reassess our approach to digital contact tracing, and should, more generally, be cautious about a myopic focus on privacy when conducting ethical assessments of data technologies.

ethics,history & philosophy of science,multidisciplinary sciences,engineering, multidisciplinary
The Roles of Trust in Government and Sense of Community in the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Privacy Calculus: Mixed Method Study Using a 2-Wave Survey and In-Depth Interviews

Hyunjin Kang,Jeong Kyu Lee,Edmund WJ Lee,Cindy Toh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/48986

2024-03-08

JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Abstract:Background: Contact tracing technology has been adopted in many countries to aid in identifying, evaluating, and handling individuals who have had contact with those infected with COVID-19. Singapore was among the countries that actively implemented the government-led contact tracing program known as TraceTogether. Despite the benefits the contact tracing program could provide to individuals and the community, privacy issues were a significant barrier to individuals' acceptance of the program. Objective: Building on the privacy calculus model, this study investigates how the perceptions of the 2 key groups (ie, government and community members) involved in the digital contact tracing factor into individuals' privacy calculus of digital contact tracing. Methods: Using a mixed method approach, we conducted (1) a 2-wave survey (n=674) and (2) in-depth interviews (n=12) with TraceTogether users in Singapore. Using structural equation modeling, this study investigated how trust in the government and the sense of community exhibited by individuals during the early stage of implementation (time 1) predicted privacy concerns, perceived benefits, and future use intentions, measured after the program was fully implemented (time 2). Expanding on the survey results, this study conducted one-on-one interviews to gain in-depth insights into the privacy considerations involved in digital contact tracing. Results: The results from the survey showed that trust in the government increased perceived benefits while decreasing privacy concerns regarding the use of TraceTogether. Furthermore, individuals who felt a connection to community members by participating in the program (ie, the sense of community) were more inclined to believe in its benefits. The sense of community also played a moderating role in the influence of government trust on perceived benefits. Follow-up in-depth interviews highlighted that having a sense of control over information and transparency in the government's data management were crucial factors in privacy considerations. The interviews also highlighted surveillance as the most prevalent aspect of privacy concerns regarding TraceTogether use. In addition, our findings revealed that trust in the government, particularly the perceived transparency of government actions, was most strongly associated with concerns regarding the secondary use of data. Conclusions: Using a mixed method approach involving a 2-wave survey and in-depth interview data, we expanded our understanding of privacy decisions and the privacy calculus in the context of digital contact tracing. The opposite influences of privacy concerns and perceived benefit on use intention suggest that the privacy calculus in TraceTogether might be viewed as a rational process of weighing between privacy risks and use benefits to make an uptake decision. However, our study demonstrated that existing perceptions toward the provider and the government in the contact tracing context, as well as the perception of the community triggered by TraceTogether use, may bias user appraisals of privacy risks and the benefits of contact tracing.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Editorial: Child and Community Mental Health in Cultural Perspective

J. Guzder,C. Rousseau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461510388572

2010-11-01

Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract:In this issue of Transcultural Psychiatry, we present a series of papers on cultural issues in child psychiatry, including selected papers from the 11th Annual McGill Advanced Study Institute (ASI) in Cultural Psychiatry, which took place April 28 to May 1, 2009. In recognition of the 50th Anniversary of the UN Declaration on the Rights of the Child, the theme of the ASI was Child, Family and Community Mental Health in Cultural Perspective. The ASI workshop and conference brought together child psychiatrists and other mental health practitioners and social scientists to reflect on the interactions between developmental psychopathology, family systems, communities and culture. An international group of scholars addressed themes including: cultural constructions of childhood and psychopathology; the impact of culture on child development and psychopathology; models of mental health and social services for lowincome countries with limited resources and for wealthier countries with increasingly diverse populations; culture and child mental health promotion; and child rights, protection, and advocacy. This issue includes papers received by the journal that were not presented at the ASI but fit the overall theme.
52 Weeks Later: Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Apps for Different Purposes Over Time

Marvin Kowalewski,Christine Utz,Martin Degeling,Theodor Schnitzler,Franziska Herbert,Leonie Schaewitz,Florian M. Farke,Steffen Becker,Markus Dürmuth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3610042

2023-07-12

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted countries around the world to introduce smartphone apps to support disease control efforts. Their purposes range from digital contact tracing to quarantine enforcement to vaccination passports, and their effectiveness often depends on widespread adoption. While previous work has identified factors that promote or hinder adoption, it has typically examined data collected at a single point in time or focused exclusively on digital contact tracing apps. In this work, we conduct the first representative study that examines changes in people's attitudes towards COVID-19-related smartphone apps for five different purposes over the first 1.5 years of the pandemic. In three survey rounds conducted between Summer 2020 and Summer 2021 in the United States and Germany, with approximately 1,000 participants per round and country, we investigate people's willingness to use such apps, their perceived utility, and people's attitudes towards them in different stages of the pandemic. Our results indicate that privacy is a consistent concern for participants, even in a public health crisis, and the collection of identity-related data significantly decreases acceptance of COVID-19 apps. Trust in authorities is essential to increase confidence in government-backed apps and foster citizens' willingness to contribute to crisis management. There is a need for continuous communication with app users to emphasize the benefits of health crisis apps both for individuals and society, thus counteracting decreasing willingness to use them and perceived usefulness as the pandemic evolves.

Human-Computer Interaction
Exploring privacy paradox in contact tracing apps adoption

Sophia Xiaoxia Duan,Hepu Deng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-03-2021-0160

IF: 5.9

2022-03-16

Internet Research

Abstract:Purpose Understanding the privacy concerns of individuals in the adoption of contact tracing apps is critical for the successful control of pandemics like COVID-19. This paper explores the privacy paradox in the adoption of contact tracing apps in Australia. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive review of the related literature has been conducted, leading to the development of a conceptual model based on the privacy calculus theory and the antecedent-privacy concern-outcome framework. Such a model is then tested and validated using structural equation modelling on the survey data collected in Australia. Findings The study shows that perceived benefit, perceived privacy risk and trust have significant influences on the adoption of contact tracing apps. It reveals that personal innovativeness and trust have significant and negative influences on perceived privacy risk. The study further finds out that personal innovativeness is insignificant to perceived benefit. It states that perceived ease of use has an insignificant influence on perceived privacy risk in the adoption of contact tracing apps. Originality/value This study is the first attempt to use the privacy calculus theory and the antecedent–privacy concern–outcome framework for exploring the privacy paradox in adopting contact tracing apps. This leads to a better understanding of the privacy concerns of individuals in the adoption of contact tracing apps. Such an understanding can help formulate targeted strategies and policies for promoting the adoption of contact tracing apps and inform future epidemic control through effective contact tracing for better emergency management.

computer science, information systems,telecommunications,business
Privacy Management and Health Information Sharing via Contact Tracing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Hypothetical Study on AI-Based Technologies

Soo Jung Hong,Hichang Cho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1981565

IF: 3.501

2021-09-24

Health Communication

Abstract:In this study, we extended and tested the privacy calculus framework in the context of a hypothetical AI-based contact-tracing technology for application during the COVID-19 pandemic that is based on the communication privacy management and contextual integrity theories. Specifically, we investigated how the perceived privacy risks and benefits of information disclosure affect the public's willingness to opt in and adopt contact-tracing technologies and how social and contextual factors influence their decision-making process. Four hundred eighteen adults in the United States participated in the study via Amazon Mechanical Turk in August 2020. A percentile bootstrap method with 5,000 resamples and bias-corrected 95% confidence intervals in structural equation modeling was used for data analysis. The participants' privacy concerns and perceived benefits significantly influenced their opt-in and adoption intentions, which suggests that the privacy calculus framework applies to the context of COVID-19 contact-tracing technologies. Perceived social, personal, and reciprocal benefits were identified as crucial mediators that link contextual variables to both opt-in and adoption intentions. Although this study was based on a hypothetical AI-based contact-tracing app, our findings provide meaningful theoretical and practical implications for future research investigating the public's technology adoption in contexts where tradeoffs between privacy risks and public health coexist.

health policy & services,communication
Decentralized is not risk-free: Understanding public perceptions of privacy-utility trade-offs in COVID-19 contact-tracing apps

Tianshi Li,Jackie,Yang,Cori Faklaris,Jennifer King,Yuvraj Agarwal,Laura Dabbish,Jason I. Hong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.11957

2020-05-25

Abstract:Contact-tracing apps have potential benefits in helping health authorities to act swiftly to halt the spread of COVID-19. However, their effectiveness is heavily dependent on their installation rate, which may be influenced by people's perceptions of the utility of these apps and any potential privacy risks due to the collection and releasing of sensitive user data (e.g., user identity and location). In this paper, we present a survey study that examined people's willingness to install six different contact-tracing apps after informing them of the risks and benefits of each design option (with a U.S.-only sample on Amazon Mechanical Turk, $N=208$). The six app designs covered two major design dimensions (centralized vs decentralized, basic contact tracing vs. also providing hotspot information), grounded in our analysis of existing contact-tracing app proposals. Contrary to assumptions of some prior work, we found that the majority of people in our sample preferred to install apps that use a centralized server for contact tracing, as they are more willing to allow a centralized authority to access the identity of app users rather than allowing tech-savvy users to infer the identity of diagnosed users. We also found that the majority of our sample preferred to install apps that share diagnosed users' recent locations in public places to show hotspots of infection. Our results suggest that apps using a centralized architecture with strong security protection to do basic contact tracing and providing users with other useful information such as hotspots of infection in public places may achieve a high adoption rate in the U.S.

Human-Computer Interaction,Computers and Society
Cultural Implications Regarding Privacy in Digital Contact Tracing Algorithms: Method Development and Empirical Ethics Analysis of a German and a Japanese Approach to Contact Tracing

Joschka Haltaufderheide,Davide Viero,Dennis Krämer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/45112

2023-06-28

Abstract:Background: Digital contact tracing algorithms (DCTAs) have emerged as a means of supporting pandemic containment strategies and protecting populations from the adverse effects of COVID-19. However, the impact of DCTAs on users' privacy and autonomy has been heavily debated. Although privacy is often viewed as the ability to control access to information, recent approaches consider it as a norm that structures social life. In this regard, cultural factors are crucial in evaluating the appropriateness of information flows in DCTAs. Hence, an important part of ethical evaluations of DCTAs is to develop an understanding of their information flow and their contextual situatedness to be able to adequately evaluate questions about privacy. However, only limited studies and conceptual approaches are currently available in this regard. Objective: This study aimed to develop a case study methodology to include contextual cultural factors in ethical analysis and present exemplary results of a subsequent analysis of 2 different DCTAs following this approach. Methods: We conducted a comparative qualitative case study of the algorithm of the Google Apple Exposure Notification Framework as exemplified in the German Corona Warn App and the Japanese approach of Computation of Infection Risk via Confidential Locational Entries (CIRCLE) method. The methodology was based on a postphenomenological perspective, combined with empirical investigations of the technological artifacts within their context of use. An ethics of disclosure approach was used to focus on the social ontologies created by the algorithms and highlight their connection to the question about privacy. Results: Both algorithms use the idea of representing a social encounter of 2 subjects. These subjects gain significance in terms of risk against the background of a representation of their temporal and spatial properties. However, the comparative analysis reveals 2 major differences. Google Apple Exposure Notification Framework prioritizes temporality over spatiality. In contrast, the representation of spatiality is reduced to distance without any direction or orientation. However, the CIRCLE framework prioritizes spatiality over temporality. These different concepts and prioritizations can be seen to align with important cultural differences in considering basic concepts such as subject, time, and space in Eastern and Western thought. Conclusions: The differences noted in this study essentially lead to 2 different ethical questions about privacy that are raised against the respective backgrounds. These findings have important implications for the ethical evaluation of DCTAs, suggesting that a culture-sensitive assessment is required to ensure that technologies fit into their context and create less concern regarding their ethical acceptability. Methodologically, our study provides a basis for an intercultural approach to the ethics of disclosure, allowing for cross-cultural dialogue that can overcome mutual implicit biases and blind spots based on cultural differences.
Corona-Warn-App: Erste Ergebnisse einer Onlineumfrage zur (Nicht-)Nutzung und Gebrauch

Jochen Meyer,Thomas Fröhlich,Kai von Holdt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.11317

2020-11-25

Abstract:In this study, the German "Corona-Warn-App" of the German Federal Government and the Robert-Koch-Institute is examined by means of a non-representative online survey with 1482 participants for reasons of use and non-use. The study provides insights into user behavior with the app during the Corona pandemic, highlights the topic of data protection and how the app is used in general. Our results show that the app is often not used due to privacy concerns, but that there are also technical problems and doubts about its usefulness. In addition, the app is mainly used due to altruistic reasons and is often opened to view the own risk assessment and to ensure its functionality. To better understand the results, we compare our results with a sample of infas 360 with 10553 participants. It is shown that the results of this study can be compared to a larger population. Finally, the results are discussed and recommendations for action are derived.

Human-Computer Interaction
Towards Mass Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps -- Learning from Users' Preferences to Improve App Design

Dana Naous,Manus Bonner,Mathias Humbert,Christine Legner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.12329

2020-11-25

Abstract:Contact tracing apps have become one of the main approaches to control and slow down the spread of COVID-19 and ease up lockdown measures. While these apps can be very effective in stopping the transmission chain and saving lives, their adoption remains under the expected critical mass. The public debate about contact tracing apps emphasizes general privacy reservations and is conducted at an expert level, but lacks the user perspective related to actual designs. To address this gap, we explore user preferences for contact tracing apps using market research techniques, and specifically conjoint analysis. Our main contributions are empirical insights into individual and group preferences, as well as insights for prescriptive design. While our results confirm the privacy-preserving design of most European contact tracing apps, they also provide a more nuanced understanding of acceptable features. Based on market simulation and variation analysis, we conclude that adding goal-congruent features will play an important role in fostering mass adoption.

Cryptography and Security,Computers and Society
Predicting the use of a COVID-19 contact tracing application: A study across two points of measurements

Urte Scholz,Roger Mundry,Alexandra M Freund

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12461

Abstract:Contact tracing mobile applications (apps) were important in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Most previous studies predicting contact tracing app use were cross-sectional and not theory-based. This study aimed at contributing to a better understanding of app use intentions and app use by applying an extended version of the protection motivation theory across two measurement points while accounting for the development of the pandemic. A total of N = 1525 participants from Switzerland (Mage = 53.70, SD = 18.73; 47% female; n = 270 completed both assessments) reported on risk perceptions, response efficacy, self-efficacy, social norms, trust in government, trust in the healthcare system, active search of COVID-19-related information, intentions for and actual (self-reported) app use. Analyses included country-specific incidences and death toll. Increases in response-efficacy, self-efficacy, trust in government, and the active search of COVID-19-related information predicted increased app-use intentions. Increases in self-efficacy, intentions, and the active search of COVID-19-related information predicted increased self-reported app use. Risk perceptions, incidence, and death toll were unrelated to both outcomes. Across an aggravation of the pandemic situation, intentions for and app use were primarily related to response-efficacy, self-efficacy, trust in government, and the active search of COVID-19-related information.
The Role of Transparency in Digital Contact Tracing During COVID-19: Insights from an Expert Survey

Dennis Krämer,Elisabeth Brachem,Lydia Schneider-Reuter,Isabella D’Angelo,Jochen Vollmann,Joschka Haltaufderheide

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-024-00485-z

2024-06-24

Health Care Analysis

Abstract:Health technologies such as apps for digital contract tracing [DCT] played a crucial role in containing and combating infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Their primary function was to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 by consistently generating and disseminating information related to various events such as encounters, vaccinations or infections. While the functionality of DCT has been well researched, the necessity of transparency in the use of DCT and the consent to share sensitive information such as users' health, vaccination and location status remains unclear. On one hand, DCT enabled the continuous monitoring of various risk factors, including data-based calculations of infection probabilities. On the other hand, digital monitoring of health risks was closely associated with various uncertainties, such as the ambiguous storage of personal data and its potential future misuse, e.g., by tech companies or health authorities. Our contribution aims to retrospectively analyze the COVID-19 pandemic from a post-pandemic perspective and utilize it as a case study for the implementation of new technological measures. We argue that under the condition of voluntary use of DCT, transparency plays a key role in convincing individuals to install health technologies on their mobile devices, keep them activated and consent to the sharing of sensitive data. We support our argument with qualitative data from an expert survey conducted between 2020 and 2021 and analyzed according to the principles of Grounded Theory.

social sciences, biomedical,health policy & services,ethics
Tracking and promoting the usage of a COVID-19 contact tracing app

Simon Munzert,Peter Selb,Anita Gohdes,Lukas F. Stoetzer,Will Lowe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01044-x

IF: 24.252

2021-01-21

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:Digital contact tracing apps have been introduced globally as an instrument to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, privacy by design impedes both the evaluation of these tools and the deployment of evidence-based interventions to stimulate uptake. We combine an online panel survey with mobile tracking data to measure the actual usage of Germany's official contact tracing app and reveal higher uptake rates among respondents with an increased risk of severe illness, but lower rates among those with a heightened risk of exposure to COVID-19. Using a randomized intervention, we show that informative and motivational video messages have very limited effect on uptake. However, findings from a second intervention suggest that even small monetary incentives can strongly increase uptake and help make digital contact tracing a more effective tool.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
Campaigning for the greater good? – How persuasive messages affect the evaluation of contact tracing apps

Christian Matt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1873493

2021-02-28

Journal of Decision Systems

Abstract:<span>The underlying scenario for adopting Covid-19 contact tracing apps is complex, given that users face potential surveillance, while expected health benefits are for the greater societal good rather than for themselves. To encourage adoption, many governments employ persuasive messages, highlighting either the app's potential societal benefits (e.g., protecting the elderly) or high privacy standards. Responding to public media criticism, we compare the impact of two different persuasive messages, which focus on either societal benefits or privacy assurance. Emphasising societal benefits successfully stimulates this decision making without users losing sight of privacy risks. In contrast, emphasising privacy assurance diminishes users' societal welfare concerns, as potential personal gains and losses largely frame their decision. These results are critical for developing and launching tracing apps, also beyond Covid-19, as well as for other applications of which widespread adoption is imperative to unlock potential societal level benefits, while requiring individual disclosure of sensitive data.</span>
A global optimization algorithm using parametric linearization relaxation

Shao-Jian Qu,Kecun Zhang,Ying Ji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.028

IF: 4.397

2007-03-01

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Abstract:
Effects of User Experience in Automated Information Processing on Perceived Usefulness of Digital Contact-Tracing Apps: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Tim Schrills,Lilian Kojan,Marthe Gruner,André Calero Valdez,Thomas Franke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/53940

2024-06-25

Abstract:Background: In pandemic situations, digital contact tracing (DCT) can be an effective way to assess one's risk of infection and inform others in case of infection. DCT apps can support the information gathering and analysis processes of users aiming to trace contacts. However, users' use intention and use of DCT information may depend on the perceived benefits of contact tracing. While existing research has examined acceptance in DCT, automation-related user experience factors have been overlooked. Objective: We pursued three goals: (1) to analyze how automation-related user experience (ie, perceived trustworthiness, traceability, and usefulness) relates to user behavior toward a DCT app, (2) to contextualize these effects with health behavior factors (ie, threat appraisal and moral obligation), and (3) to collect qualitative data on user demands for improved DCT communication. Methods: Survey data were collected from 317 users of a nationwide-distributed DCT app during the COVID-19 pandemic after it had been in app stores for >1 year using a web-based convenience sample. We assessed automation-related user experience. In addition, we assessed threat appraisal and moral obligation regarding DCT use to estimate a partial least squares structural equation model predicting use intention. To provide practical steps to improve the user experience, we surveyed users' needs for improved communication of information via the app and analyzed their responses using thematic analysis. Results: Data validity and perceived usefulness showed a significant correlation of r=0.38 (P<.001), goal congruity and perceived usefulness correlated at r=0.47 (P<.001), and result diagnosticity and perceived usefulness had a strong correlation of r=0.56 (P<.001). In addition, a correlation of r=0.35 (P<.001) was observed between Subjective Information Processing Awareness and perceived usefulness, suggesting that automation-related changes might influence the perceived utility of DCT. Finally, a moderate positive correlation of r=0.47 (P<.001) was found between perceived usefulness and use intention, highlighting the connection between user experience variables and use intention. Partial least squares structural equation modeling explained 55.6% of the variance in use intention, with the strongest direct predictor being perceived trustworthiness (β=.54; P<.001) followed by moral obligation (β=.22; P<.001). Based on the qualitative data, users mainly demanded more detailed information about contacts (eg, place and time of contact). They also wanted to share information (eg, whether they wore a mask) to improve the accuracy and diagnosticity of risk calculation. Conclusions: The perceived result diagnosticity of DCT apps is crucial for perceived trustworthiness and use intention. By designing for high diagnosticity for the user, DCT apps could improve their support in the action regulation of users, resulting in higher perceived trustworthiness and use in pandemic situations. In general, automation-related user experience has greater importance for use intention than general health behavior or experience.
More Than Just Privacy: Using Contextual Integrity to Evaluate the Long-Term Risks from COVID-19 Surveillance Technologies

Jessica Vitak,Michael Zimmer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948250

2020-07-01

Social Media + Society

Abstract:The global coronavirus pandemic has raised important questions regarding how to balance public health concerns with privacy protections for individual citizens. In this essay, we evaluate contact tracing apps, which have been offered as a technological solution to minimize the spread of COVID-19. We argue that apps such as those built on Google and Apple’s “exposure notification system” should be evaluated in terms of the contextual integrity of information flows; in other words, the appropriateness of sharing health and location data will be contextually dependent on factors such as who will have access to data, as well as the transmission principles underlying data transfer. We also consider the role of prevailing social and political values in this assessment, including the large-scale social benefits that can be obtained through such information sharing. However, caution should be taken in violating contextual integrity, even in the case of a pandemic, because it risks a long-term loss of autonomy and growing function creep for surveillance and monitoring technologies.

communication
In times of crisis: Public perceptions toward COVID-19 contact tracing apps in China, Germany, and the United States

Genia Kostka,Sabrina Habich-Sobiegalla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221083285

2022-04-03

Abstract:The adoption of COVID-19 contact tracing apps (CTAs) has been proposed as an important measure to contain the spread of COVID-19. Based on a cross-national dataset, this article analyzes public perceptions toward CTAs and the factors that drive CTA acceptance in China, Germany, and the United States. We find that public acceptance of CTAs is significantly higher in China as compared with Germany and the United States. Despite very different sociopolitical contexts, there are striking similarities in the factors that drive CTA acceptance in all three countries. Citizens are willing to accept digital contact tracing despite concerns about privacy infringement and government surveillance, as long as the apps are perceived as effective in lowering infection rates and providing health information. This creates a chicken-and-egg problem for CTAs in Germany and the United States where CTAs are voluntary: a high citizen adoption rate is necessary for CTAs to be effective, but CTAs are only effective if adoption rates are high.

communication
A case study on the development of the German Corona-Warn-App

Mohamad Fawaz Enaya,Thomas Klingbeil,Jacob Krüger,David Broneske,Frank Feinbube,Gunter Saake

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112020

IF: 3.5

2024-03-30

Journal of Systems and Software

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically changed daily life and required fast responses to new situations, such as restricted public life. A major means to limit infections have been contact-tracing apps that inform an individual about a potential infection, helping to initiate countermeasures faster. While different tracing apps have been compared technologically, we are not aware of studies providing insights into their development processes during the pandemic emergency situation. To address this gap, we report an exploratory case study on how the German open-source Corona-Warn-App has been developed at SAP SE—and how other organizations (e.g., Deutsche Telekom AG), researchers, and individual developers contributed. We elicited data on the process, practices, and challenges by interviewing six developers at SAP SE, analyzing documentation, and discussing our data with an expert on the app's development. Overall, we provide insights into how the development process of the Corona-Warn-App differed from other projects at SAP SE (e.g., testing), discuss the causes (i.e., public interest causing researchers to perform tests), and study the consequences (i.e., emergency tickets by researchers). Our findings can guide organizations when developing software in similar emergency situations (e.g., pandemics) in which reliable software needs to be developed within a short period of time.

computer science, theory & methods, software engineering
The impact of transparency and trust on user acceptance of contact tracing apps: Implications for the adoption of crisis response apps

Enno Steinbrink,Christian Reuter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104661

IF: 4.842

2024-07-25

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract:Digital technology and smartphones provide great opportunities to support crisis response measures. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries introduced contact tracing apps (CTAs) to prevent the virus's spread and identify infection clusters. Because wide acceptance is necessary for these apps to work, it has been a subject of research. Past research often highlighted the role of trust for acceptance and suggested that technical transparency by opening the source code can help to build trust. For this reason, we studied the acceptance of two German apps: the Corona-Warn-App (CWA), which was developed as open-source software early on, and the Luca app, which did not publish the source code initially. We conducted a multinomial logistic regression testing effects on the adoption of (1) only the CWA, (2) only the Luca app, or (3) both apps. As predictors, we considered the role of trust in the app publisher and the government and controlled for predictors relevant to past research. We found trust to have a significant effect on the acceptance of the apps. A self-reported understanding of the term "open-source software" and a perceived threat by COVID-19 had a positive effect for the Corona-Warn-App or both apps but not for the Luca app alone. Being from Eastern Germany lowered the acceptance of the Luca app or both apps. Our findings can add to previous CTA acceptance research and provide insights for policymakers for future digital crisis measures, especially for populations comparable to the German population regarding government trust and privacy attitudes.

geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,water resources

Moves you shouldn't make.

Privacy versus Public Health? A Reassessment of Centralised and Decentralised Digital Contact Tracing

The Roles of Trust in Government and Sense of Community in the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Privacy Calculus: Mixed Method Study Using a 2-Wave Survey and In-Depth Interviews

Editorial: Child and Community Mental Health in Cultural Perspective

52 Weeks Later: Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Apps for Different Purposes Over Time

Exploring privacy paradox in contact tracing apps adoption

Privacy Management and Health Information Sharing via Contact Tracing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Hypothetical Study on AI-Based Technologies

Decentralized is not risk-free: Understanding public perceptions of privacy-utility trade-offs in COVID-19 contact-tracing apps

Cultural Implications Regarding Privacy in Digital Contact Tracing Algorithms: Method Development and Empirical Ethics Analysis of a German and a Japanese Approach to Contact Tracing

Corona-Warn-App: Erste Ergebnisse einer Onlineumfrage zur (Nicht-)Nutzung und Gebrauch

Towards Mass Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps -- Learning from Users' Preferences to Improve App Design

Predicting the use of a COVID-19 contact tracing application: A study across two points of measurements

The Role of Transparency in Digital Contact Tracing During COVID-19: Insights from an Expert Survey

Tracking and promoting the usage of a COVID-19 contact tracing app

Campaigning for the greater good? – How persuasive messages affect the evaluation of contact tracing apps

A global optimization algorithm using parametric linearization relaxation

Effects of User Experience in Automated Information Processing on Perceived Usefulness of Digital Contact-Tracing Apps: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

More Than Just Privacy: Using Contextual Integrity to Evaluate the Long-Term Risks from COVID-19 Surveillance Technologies

In times of crisis: Public perceptions toward COVID-19 contact tracing apps in China, Germany, and the United States

A case study on the development of the German Corona-Warn-App

The impact of transparency and trust on user acceptance of contact tracing apps: Implications for the adoption of crisis response apps