Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

On Measuring Bias in Online Information

Quantifying Biases in Online Information Exposure

Evaluation Metrics for Measuring Bias in Search Engine Results

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Bias in Internet Measurement Platforms

Towards More Accountable Search Engines: Online Evaluation of Representation Bias

Measuring and Addressing Indexical Bias in Information Retrieval

Quantifying Search Bias: Investigating Sources of Bias for Political Searches in Social Media

Bias in Search and Recommender Systems

A Principled Approach for a New Bias Measure

Measuring Online Social Bubbles

As Biased as You Measure: Methodological Pitfalls of Bias Evaluations in Speaker Verification Research

Auditing Search Engines for Differential Satisfaction Across Demographics

Undesirable Biases in NLP: Addressing Challenges of Measurement

Modeling and Counteracting Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems

De-biasing "bias" measurement

Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption

Measuring Personalization of Web Search

This Prompt is Measuring <MASK>: Evaluating Bias Evaluation in Language Models

Quantifying Voter Biases in Online Platforms: An Instrumental Variable Approach

Bias-Aware Design for Informed Decisions: Raising Awareness of Self-Selection Bias in User Ratings and Reviews