Abstract:Abstract. The spread of a new type of coronavirus infection, COVID-19, is no longer an emergency of international concern. This decision was adopted by the World Health Organization on May 5. The epidemic of coronavirus infection, which began at the end of 2019 in China, was declared by WHO in January 2020 as an emergency situation of international importance in the field of health care. After the epidemic spread to other countries, it was declared a pandemic in March 2020. Many countries resorted to unprecedented quarantine measures, which affected the world economy and people's lives. Lockdowns and a mask regime were introduced, borders were closed, and air traffic between countries was interrupted. After mass vaccination and the appearance of new, less lethal strains, the number of deaths decreased sharply - if in January 2021, about 100,000 people died of COVID-19 in a week, then in April 2023 - 3,500. The reduction in mortality made it possible to cancel most of the restrictive measures during 2022. According to the WHO, about 20 million people have become victims of the disease over the past three years and several months. These are all deaths related to infection. According to official data collected by the American Johns Hopkins Institute, the coronavirus infection itself caused the death of about 7 million people. WHO emphasizes that the virus has not disappeared, people continue to get sick, and the infection is likely to remain in the human population as a respiratory disease. The role of the ban as a method of legal regulation during the coronavirus pandemic in Ukraine is studied. The legislative measures adopted in Ukraine to combat the spread of COVID-19 and their effectiveness are analyzed. The impact of bans on civil rights and freedoms is considered, and alternative methods of legal regulation are explored. As a result of the scientific investigation, recommendations were made regarding the optimal use of prohibitions during the coronavirus pandemic, taking into account the protection of public health and the preservation of civil rights and freedoms. The legislative measures adopted in Ukraine to combat the spread of the coronavirus are considered. Aspects such as banning mass events, closing non-residential premises, restricting the movement of the population and others are analyzed. The effectiveness of these measures in reducing the number of cases of the disease, as well as their impact on the dynamics of the spread of the virus, is being studied. The article analyzes how the bans affect freedom of movement, freedom of choice, freedom of religion and other basic civil rights. Issues related to restrictions on human rights and the possibility of violation of the guarantees provided for by the Constitution of Ukraine and international treaties are considered. Conclusions and recommendations regarding the optimal use of bans during the coronavirus pandemic in Ukraine are formulated. A conclusion was made about the effectiveness of the application of prohibitions as a method of legal regulation in the conditions of the pandemic. The bans have proven effective in reducing disease rates and limiting the spread of the virus. The study is of great importance for the Ukrainian legal community, as it examines the issue of bans as a method of legal regulation in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. The results of the study can serve as a basis for further improvement of the legislation and the development of more effective strategies for combating pandemic threats, while preserving the rights and freedoms of citizens. The conclusions emphasize the need to continue research in this area and further search for optimal approaches to legal regulation during the pandemic, which would ensure the protection of public health, as well as the preservation of civil rights and freedoms in Ukraine.

Dietary patterns, Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline: recent insights.

Health promotion perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic: The importance of religion

Spiritual Health and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Impacts on Orthodox Christianity Devotion Practices, Rituals, and Religious Pilgrimages

Perceived Effectiveness, Restrictiveness, and Compliance with Containment Measures against the Covid-19 Pandemic: An International Comparative Study in 11 Countries

Religion and Spirituality on Social Media in the Aftermath of the Global Pandemic

Catholic religious agency during the Covid-19 emergency: the issue of vaccines

The Faith Community and the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?

Prohibition as a method of legal regulation during the coronavirus pandemic in Ukraine

The Effect of Governmental Health Measures on Public Behaviour During the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak

Change Communication Strategy in Media Campaigns and Covid-19 Rising Infections in Nigeria

A hemolytic assay for the estimation of functional mannose-binding lectin levels in human serum.

Trust in Government Actions During the COVID-19 Crisis

An examination of the relationship between risk perceptions, cultural-religious beliefs and coping during COVID-19 pandemic control in South Asian countries: a systematic review

Religion and COVID 19 Pandemic for better or for worse?

Evolution and control of the COVID-19 pandemic: A global perspective

Comparative Study of Government Response Measures and Epidemic Trends for COVID-19 Global Pandemic

How Does Islamic Organizations Respond to COVID-19 in Indonesia? A Case Study

Conformity behavior in crises: evidence from the COVID-19 epidemic in China

Framing a Theological Response to COVID‐19 in the Presence of the Religious Other

Community responses to COVID-19 pandemic first wave containment measures: a multinational study

The Phenomenon of Crisis of Religious Understanding in the Midst of the Covid-19 Pandemic