Response of treatment-naive brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery
Chibawanye I Ene,Christina Abi Faraj,Thomas H Beckham,Jeffrey S Weinberg,Clark R Andersen,Ali S Haider,Ganesh Rao,Sherise D Ferguson,Christopher A Alvarez-Brenkenridge,Betty Y S Kim,Amy B Heimberger,Ian E McCutcheon,Sujit S Prabhu,Chenyang Michael Wang,Amol J Ghia,Susan L McGovern,Caroline Chung,Mary Frances McAleer,Martin C Tom,Subha Perni,Todd A Swanson,Debra N Yeboa,Tina M Briere,Jason T Huse,Gregory N Fuller,Frederick F Lang,Jing Li,Dima Suki,Raymond E Sawaya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47998-8
2024-05-02
Abstract:With improvements in survival for patients with metastatic cancer, long-term local control of brain metastases has become an increasingly important clinical priority. While consensus guidelines recommend surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for lesions >3 cm, smaller lesions (≤3 cm) treated with SRS alone elicit variable responses. To determine factors influencing this variable response to SRS, we analyzed outcomes of brain metastases ≤3 cm diameter in patients with no prior systemic therapy treated with frame-based single-fraction SRS. Following SRS, 259 out of 1733 (15%) treated lesions demonstrated MRI findings concerning for local treatment failure (LTF), of which 202 /1733 (12%) demonstrated LTF and 54/1733 (3%) had an adverse radiation effect. Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size (>1.5 cm) and melanoma histology were associated with higher LTF rates. Our results demonstrate that brain metastases ≤3 cm are not uniformly responsive to SRS and suggest that prospective studies to evaluate the effect of SRS alone or in combination with surgery on brain metastases ≤3 cm matched by tumor size and histology are warranted. These studies will help establish multi-disciplinary treatment guidelines that improve local control while minimizing radiation necrosis during treatment of brain metastasis ≤3 cm.