Masamitsu Honma,Airi Kitazawa,Alex Cayley,Richard V Williams,Chris Barber,Thierry Hanser,Roustem Saiakhov,Suman Chakravarti,Glenn J Myatt,Kevin P Cross,Emilio Benfenati,Giuseppa Raitano,Ovanes Mekenyan,Petko Petkov,Cecilia Bossa,Romualdo Benigni,Chiara Laura Battistelli,Alessandro Giuliani,Olga Tcheremenskaia,Christine DeMeo,Ulf Norinder,Hiromi Koga,Ciloy Jose,Nina Jeliazkova,Nikolay Kochev,Vesselina Paskaleva,Chihae Yang,Pankaj R Daga,Robert D Clark,James Rathman

Abstract:The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) M7 guideline allows the use of in silico approaches for predicting Ames mutagenicity for the initial assessment of impurities in pharmaceuticals. This is the first international guideline that addresses the use of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models in lieu of actual toxicological studies for human health assessment. Therefore, QSAR models for Ames mutagenicity now require higher predictive power for identifying mutagenic chemicals. To increase the predictive power of QSAR models, larger experimental datasets from reliable sources are required. The Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences (DGM/NIHS) of Japan recently established a unique proprietary Ames mutagenicity database containing 12140 new chemicals that have not been previously used for developing QSAR models. The DGM/NIHS provided this Ames database to QSAR vendors to validate and improve their QSAR tools. The Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project was initiated in 2014 with 12 QSAR vendors testing 17 QSAR tools against these compounds in three phases. We now present the final results. All tools were considerably improved by participation in this project. Most tools achieved >50% sensitivity (positive prediction among all Ames positives) and predictive power (accuracy) was as high as 80%, almost equivalent to the inter-laboratory reproducibility of Ames tests. To further increase the predictive power of QSAR tools, accumulation of additional Ames test data is required as well as re-evaluation of some previous Ames test results. Indeed, some Ames-positive or Ames-negative chemicals may have previously been incorrectly classified because of methodological weakness, resulting in false-positive or false-negative predictions by QSAR tools. These incorrect data hamper prediction and are a source of noise in the development of QSAR models. It is thus essential to establish a large benchmark database consisting only of well-validated Ames test results to build more accurate QSAR models.

The enhancement scheme for the predictive ability of QSAR: A case of mutagenicity

QSAR study on the toxicity of chemical components of Chinese materia medica causing the carcinogenicity of rats

A novel procedure for selection of molecular descriptors: QSAR model for mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds

QSAR Study on Toxicity of Chemical Components of Chinese Materia Medica and Acute Toxicity of Rats

Quantum mechanical quantitative structure-activity relationships to avoid mutagenicity

Improvement of quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project

An assessment of mutagenicity of chemical substances by (quantitative) structure–activity relationship

Prediction of the Aquatic Toxicity of Aromatic Compounds to Tetrahymena Pyriformis Through Support Vector Regression

The coefficient of conformism of a correlative prediction ( CCCP ): Building up reliable nano-QSPRs/QSARs for endpoints of nanoparticles in different experimental conditions encoded via quasi-SMILES

Chemical rules for optimization of chemical mutagenicity via matched molecular pairs analysis and machine learning methods

A Case Study of Logistic QSAR Modeling Methods and Robustness Tests.

Two QSAR models for predicting the toxicity of chemicals towards Tetrahymena pyriformis based on topological-norm descriptors and spatial-norm descriptors

Stacked ensemble\-based mutagenicity prediction model using multiple modalities with graph attention network

Role of in silico genotoxicity tools in the regulatory assessment of pharmaceutical impurities

Using Support Vector Regression Coupled with the Genetic Algorithm for Predicting Acute Toxicity to the Fathead Minnow

In Silico Prediction of the Toxicity of Nitroaromatic Compounds: Application of Ensemble Learning QSAR Approach

Exploring Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Deep Learning Driven QSAR Models of Mutagenicity

Prediction-driven matched molecular pairs to interpret QSARs and aid the molecular optimization process

Development of Generalized QSAR Models for Predicting Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Metal Oxides Nanoparticles

The system of self-consistent models for pesticide toxicity to Daphnia magna

Mutagenicity risk prediction of PAH and derivative mixtures by in silico simulations oriented from CYP compound I-mediated metabolic activation