The PSDA and the Depressed Elderly: “Intermittent Competency” Revisited

A. Shamoo,D. Irving
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/JCE199304117
1993-03-01
Abstract:The contribution by Linda Ganzini, Melinda A. Lee, Ronald T. Heintz, and Joseph D. Bloom, “Is the Patient Self-Determination Act Appropriate for Elderly Persons Hospitalized for Depression?” is a gentle yet lucid reminder from practitioners in the field that the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA), as prescribed and enacted, poses certain challenges for those concerned with and responsible for patient care, as well as for those concerned with the protection of patient autonomy. In the case of the depressed elderly presenting to hospital admissions, a “clean fit” with those for whom the act was intended (competent adults) appears to be lacking. This fact should be seriously taken into consideration by those who will be involved in adapting the intent of the PSDA to their particular state regulation, health-care institution, or medical practice. It also points once again to the need for health-care providers, lawyers, ethicists, and especially psychiatrists, to come to terms with more realistic and agreed-upon definitions of competency, incompetency, and--particularly-intermittent competency. The need for psychiatry to make these distinctions was prominent in earlier controversial debates about the use of the mentally ill in both therapeutic and experimental research. Although progress has been made, there still is further need for clarification of these terms, as the article by Ganzini et al. illustrates. The article also serves as a flag for philosophers, bioethicists, and lawyers to continue to reconsider and refine their related definitions of autonomy, informed consent, and civil competency, based on a more realistic and accurate understanding of those psychiatric terms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?