Role of Hypothalamic Mechanisms in Thalamic Pain

E. Spiegel,M. Kletzkin,E. G. Szekely,H. Wycis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.4.10.739

IF: 9.9

1954-10-01

Neurology

Abstract:THE MECHANISM of the Dejerine-Roussy syndrome is obscure. The original view of Roussy' that the pain and hyperpathia are due to an irritation of the involved parts of the thalamus has already been contradicted. Head2 has pointed out that most of these cases are due to vascular disturbances that produce the maximum symptoms immediately after the cerebrovascular accident, while the characteristic symptoms of the thalamic syndrome develop at a much later time, when the patient has recovered from the direct effect of the vascular lesion. But Head's assumption of a release of the lateral part of the thalamus from cortical inhibition could not be maintained. Experimentally cortical stimulation3 as well as ablation4 failed to show the existence of a cortical inhibition of thalamic discharges, and also the absence of thalamic pain in cases with large lesions of the internal capsule mitigates against Head's theory. Similarly the hypothesis of a release of the thalamus from a striopallidal inhibition6 is not acceptable, since in most diseases of the striopallidum or of its efferent fibers pain is not present. Likewise in our material with pallidotomy and ansotomy, pain did not occur. Many authors have been attracted by the theory that the phylogenetically young epicritic sensation inhibits the phylogenetically old protopathic sensation (for peripheral nerves: Rivers and Head,u for thalamic pain: Foersteld). However, in the majority of cases with degeneration of the posterior column pain does not appear. Instances of spontaneous pain without a lesion of the epicritic sensation have been observed as well as elimination of the epicritic system without hyperpathia.7-11 Of particular interest is Lhermitte's'* view that the thalamus has a filter function, and that destruction of this filter results in the conduction of impulses to the cerebral cortex that normally are retained by the thalamus. The opposite view was expressed by Wallenberg,ls who believed that pain im-