Pelvic abscess - to drain or not to drain?

Sophie Michelle Strong,Stylianos Michail Lazanakis,Elizabeth Ball

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000897

2023-10-01

Abstract:Purpose of review: Pelvic abscess is a common gynaecological condition, particularly during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, possibly resulting from obstacles to accessing care during this time. To date, no consensus guideline on management exists with a lack of applicable randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing medical management with antibiotics alone, image-guided drainage and surgical management, despite this being a potentially life-threatening condition. Recent findings: We present the current literature assessing risks, which contribute to failure of medical therapy, predictive models to guide management and reports of long-term sequelae. Consideration for early laparoscopic or image-guided drainage should be given to women in whom fertility is a priority, pelvic abscess at least 7 cm, white blood cell count on admission more than 16 x 1000/μl, bilateral pelvic abscess, intrauterine device in situ for more than 5.5 years and preexisting endometrioma. Pelvic abscess rupture or severe sepsis should always trigger timely drainage. Summary: We present the current knowledge on management of pelvic abscesses to help guide clinical practice supported by the most recent evidence. We report the lack of high-quality evidence for many aspects of pelvic abscess treatment and call for well designed large multicentre RCTs to answer the question of which treatment yields the best outcomes.