Effect of reactive oxygen intermediates and antioxidants on proliferation and function of T lymphocytes.

W. Dröge,S. Mihm,M. Bockstette,S. Roth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(94)34084-6

Methods in Enzymology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Application of Rockall Risk Scoring System in Patients with Acute Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

WANG Kai,JIN Nuyun,WEI Shuangqin,LI Yuqin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7619/jcmp.201403005

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective To explore the application of Rockall risk scoring system in patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and to evaluate the predictive effect of Rockall risk scoring system on rebleeding and mortality. Methods Clinical materials of 474 inpatients were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into 4 groups according to ages. Rockall risk scoring system was used. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to assess its effect on rebleeding rate and mortality. Results In 474 cases of ANVUGIB patients,the ratio of maleto female was2. 36 ︰1,and2 2 patients died( 4. 6 4 %),5 4 patients had rebleeding( 1 1. 3 9 %).AUC = 0. 849( P 0. 05) for predicting the mortality AUC = 0. 849( P 0. 05),and AUC = 0. 675( P 0. 05) for predicating re-bleeding in Rockall scoring system. The rate of rebleeding in each group was 10%,7. 53%,12. 58% and 19. 58% respectively. AUC for assessing the rate of rebleeding was0. 6 1 0,0. 7 4 0,0. 6 3 2 and 0. 7 2 7 respectively,while mortality was( 0 / 8 0,0 %),( 8 / 1 4 6,5. 48%),( 4 /151,2. 65%) and( 10 /97,10. 3%) respectively in Rockall risk scoring system.Conclusion Rockall risk scoring system shows a good accuracy for the prediction of ANVUGIB mortality. In the groups with 40 ~ 59 years and ≥80 years,Rockall risk scoring system plays a higher value in predicting the rate of rebleeding.
Which scoring system should be used for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding? Old or new?

Hong Jae Jeon,Hee Seok Moon,In Sun Kwon,Sun Hyung Kang,Jae Kyu Sung,Hyun Yong Jeong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15555

Abstract:Background and aim: Several scoring systems for predicting outcomes in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) have recently been devised, but not sufficiently validated. We compared the predictive accuracy of several scoring systems and assessed the usefulness of new scoring systems. Methods: The medical records of 1048 patients with NVUGIB were reviewed to collect demographic, clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) were calculated for the ABC, new Japanese scoring system, Progetto Nazionale Emorrhagia Digestiva (PNED), and other scores to compare their predictive accuracy for 30-day mortality, therapeutic intervention, rebleeding, and prolonged hospital stay (≥ 10 days). Outcome predictors were identified by multivariate analysis. Results: The ABC, new Japanese scoring system, and PNED scores best predicted 30-day mortality (AUROC 0.907), need for therapeutic intervention (AUROC 0.707), and rebleeding (AUROC 0.874), respectively (all P < 0.001). The ABC and PNED scores were similarly better at predicting prolonged hospital stay (ABC AUROC: 0.765; PNED AUROC: 0.790; both P < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was related to sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP), syncope, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albumin, heart failure, disseminated malignancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and liver cirrhosis. Sex, age, SBP, hematemesis, blood urea nitrogen, and eGFR independently predicted the need for therapeutic intervention. Sex, SBP, pulse, albumin level, heart failure, disseminated malignancy, and COPD predicted rebleeding. Conclusion: The outcomes of patients with NVUGIB were better predicted by newly developed than by old scoring systems.
Predictive utility of the Rockall scoring system in patients suffering from acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage

De-Ping Han,Cai-Qian Gou,Xin-Mian Ren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2620

2024-08-27

World J Gastrointest Surg

Abstract:Background: Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) represents a significant clinical challenge due to its unpredictability and potentially severe outcomes. The Rockall risk score has emerged as a critical tool for prognostic assessment in patients with ANVUGIB, aiding in the prediction of rebleeding and mortality. However, its applicability and accuracy in the Chinese population remain understudied. Aim: To assess the prognostic value of the Rockall risk score in a Chinese cohort of patients with ANVUGIB. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 168 ANVUGIB patients' medical records was conducted. The study employed statistical tests, including the t-test, χ 2 test, spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, to assess the relationship between the Rockall score and clinical outcomes, specifically focusing on rebleeding events within 3 months post-assessment. Results: Significant associations were found between the Rockall score and various clinical outcomes. High Rockall scores were significantly associated with rebleeding events (r = 0.735, R 2 = 0.541, P < 0.001) and strongly positively correlated with adverse outcomes. Low hemoglobin levels (t = 2.843, P = 0.005), high international normalized ratio (t = 3.710, P < 0.001), active bleeding during endoscopy (χ 2 = 7.950, P = 0.005), large ulcer size (t = 6.348, P < 0.001), and requiring blood transfusion (χ 2 = 6.381, P = 0.012) were all significantly associated with rebleeding events. Furthermore, differences in treatment and management strategies were identified between patients with and without rebleeding events. ROC analysis indicated the excellent discriminative power (sensitivity: 0.914; specificity: 0.816; area under the curve: 0.933; Youden index: 0.730) of the Rockall score in predicting rebleeding events within 3 months. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the prognostic value of the Rockall risk score for ANVUGIB in the Chinese population. The results underscore the potential of the Rockall score as an effective tool for risk stratification and prognostication, with implications for guiding risk-appropriate management strategies and optimizing care for patients with ANVUGIB.
Clinical model for predicting rebleeding within 30 days after transcatheter arterial embolization for treating acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

XIAO Weizhong,ZHANG Zhiyuan,SU Tianhao,YANG Siwei,LI Jian,ZHAO Yihao,JIN Long

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13929/j.issn.1672-8475.2023.05.009

2023-01-01

Abstract:Objective To establish a logistic model based on clinical data of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding（ANVUGIB） patients, and to observe its value for predicting rebleeding within 30 days after transcatheter arterial embolization（TAE）. Methods Totally 139 ANVUGIB patients who underwent TAE were enrolled. The technical success rate of TAE and the rebleeding rate within 30 days after TAE were observed. Based on clinical data, univariate and multiple analysis were performed to screen the impact factors of rebleeding. A clinical logistic model was then established, and its value for predicting rebleeding after TAE was analyzed. Results The technical success rate of TAE was 95.68%（133/139）. During 30 days’ follow-up for 133 cases with successful TAE, rebleeding occurred in 29 cases（29/133,21.80%）. Preoperative coagulation dysfunction（OR=3.74, P=0.045） and high Rockall score（OR=1.97, P=0.005） were risk factors for rebleeding within 30 days after TAE for ANVUGIB, while male（OR=0.19, P=0.007） and preoperative CT positive（OR=0.06, P=0.047） were protective factors. The sensitivity and specificity of logistic model based on the above 4 factors for predicting rebleeding within 30 days after TAE for ANVUGIB patients was 82.80% and 75.00%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.817, higher than that of Rockall score, Blackford score and Australian Institute of Medical Scientists 65 score（all P＜0.05）. Conclusion Clinical model based on gender, preoperative coagulation dysfunction, Rockall score and CT findings was helpful for predicting rebleeding within 30 days after TAE for ANVUGIB.
Comparison Of The Glasgow-Blatchford And Rockall Scores For Prediction Of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Outcomes In Chinese Patients

Mingliang Lu,Gang Sun,Hua Huang,Xiaomei Zhang,Youqing Xu,Shiyao Chen,Ying Song,Xueliang Li,Bin Lv,Jianlin Ren,Xueqing Chen,Hui Zhang,Chen Mo,Yanzhi Wang,Yunsheng Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015716

IF: 1.6

2019-01-01

Medicine

Abstract:The Glasgow-Blatchford scores (GBS) and Rockall scores (RS) are commonly used for stratifying patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH). Although predictive value of these scoring methods has been extensively validated, their clinical effectiveness remains unclear. The following study evaluated the GBS and RS scoring system with reference to bleeding, needs for further surgery, endoscopic intervention and death, in order to verify their effectiveness and accuracy in clinical application.Patients who presented with NVUGIH, or who were consequently diagnosed with the disease (by endoscopy examination) between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2012 were enrolled in the study. GBS and RS scores were compared to predict bleeding, the needs for further surgery, endoscopic intervention, death by ROC curves and AUC value.Among 2977 patients, the pre-endoscopic RS and complete RS score (CRS) were superior to the GBS score (AUC: 0.842 vs 0.804 vs 0.622, respectively) for predicting the mortality risk in patients. The pre-endoscopic RS score predicting re-bleeding was significantly higher than the CRS and the GBS score (AUC: 0.658 vs 0.548 vs 0.528, respectively). In addition, the 3 scoring systems revealed to be poor predictors of surgical operation effectiveness (AUC: 0.589 vs 0.547 vs 0.504, respectively).Our data demonstrated that the GBS and RS scoring systems could be used to predict outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Risk Factors for Predicting Early Variceal Rebleeding after Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

Liang Xu,Feng Ji,Qin-Wei Xu,Mie-Qing Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i28.3347

IF: 5.374

2011-01-01

World Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract:AIM:To analyze the clinical risk factors for early variceal rebleeding after endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL). METHODS:342 cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices who received elective EVL to prevent bleeding or rebleeding at our endoscopy center between January 2005 and July 2010. were included in this study. The early rebleeding cases after EVL were confirmed by clinical signs or endoscopy. A case-control study was performed comparing the patients presenting with early rebleeding with those without this complication. RESULTS:The incidence of early rebleeding after EVL was 7.60%, and the morbidity of rebleeding was 26.9%. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that four variables were independent risk factors for early rebleeding: moderate to excessive ascites [odds ratio (OR) 62.83, 95% CI: 9.39-420.56, P < 0.001], the number of bands placed (OR 17.36, 95% CI: 4.00-75.34, P < 0.001), the extent of varices (OR 15.41, 95% CI: 2.84-83.52, P = 0.002) and prothrombin time (PT) > 18 s (OR 11.35, 95% CI: 1.93-66.70, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION:The early rebleeding rate after EVL is mainly affected by the volume of ascites, number of rubber bands used to ligate, severity of varices and prolonged PT. Effective measures for prevention and treatment should be adopted before and after EVL.
Comparison and validation of several scoring systems for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study

Kyung Ryun In,Young Eun Oh,Hee Seok Moon,Su Kyoung Jeong,Sun Hyung Kang,Jae Kyu Sung,Hyun Yong Jeong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79643-1

IF: 4.6

2024-11-22

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Various scoring systems have been developed to predict outcomes in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). However, their accuracy remains unclear. This study aimed to compare and validate the predictive performance of several established scoring systems in patients with NVUGIB: Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS) and the age, blood tests, and comorbidities (ABC), mental status–anesthesiologist score–pulse–albumin–systolic blood pressure–hemoglobin (MAP(ASH)), Japanese, and Charlson comorbidity index-in-hospital onset–albumin-mental status–Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status–steroids (CHAMPS) scores. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,241 patients who presented to the emergency department with NVUGIB and subsequently required hospitalization. Each scoring system was evaluated for its ability to predict in-hospital mortality, rebleeding, and the need for radiological or surgical intervention. The ABC score showed the highest accuracy in predicting in-hospital mortality. The MAP(ASH) score was the most effective predictor of rebleeding and the need for interventions. Different scoring systems have been optimized for various clinical outcomes. The ABC score was the best for predicting mortality, whereas the MAP(ASH) score excelled in identifying rebleeding risks and intervention needs. The selection of an appropriate scoring tool based on specific clinical scenarios can improve patient management and resource allocation in NVUGIB.

multidisciplinary sciences
Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study

Adrian J Stanley,Loren Laine,Harry R Dalton,Jing H Ngu,Michael Schultz,Roseta Abazi,Liam Zakko,Susan Thornton,Kelly Wilkinson,Cristopher J L Khor,Iain A Murray,Stig B Laursen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6432

2017-01-04

BMJ

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive accuracy and clinical utility of five risk scoring systems in the assessment of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.DESIGN: International multicentre prospective study.SETTING: Six large hospitals in Europe, North America, Asia, and Oceania.PARTICIPANTS: 3012 consecutive patients presenting over 12 months with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of pre-endoscopy scores (admission Rockall, AIMS65, and Glasgow Blatchford) and post-endoscopy scores (full Rockall and PNED) for their ability to predict predefined clinical endpoints: a composite endpoint (transfusion, endoscopic treatment, interventional radiology, surgery, or 30 day mortality), endoscopic treatment, 30 day mortality, rebleeding, and length of hospital stay. Optimum score thresholds to identify low risk and high risk patients were determined.RESULTS: The Glasgow Blatchford score was best (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.86) at predicting intervention or death compared with the full Rockall score (0.70), PNED score (0.69), admission Rockall score (0.66, and AIMS65 score (0.68) (all P<0.001). A Glasgow Blatchford score of ≤1 was the optimum threshold to predict survival without intervention (sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 34.6%). The Glasgow Blatchford score was better at predicting endoscopic treatment (AUROC 0.75) than the AIMS65 (0.62) and admission Rockall scores (0.61) (both P<0.001). A Glasgow Blatchford score of ≥7 was the optimum threshold to predict endoscopic treatment (sensitivity 80%, specificity 57%). The PNED (AUROC 0.77) and AIMS65 scores (0.77) were best at predicting mortality, with both superior to admission Rockall score (0.72) and Glasgow Blatchford score (0.64; P<0.001). Score thresholds of ≥4 for PNED, ≥2 for AIMS65, ≥4 for admission Rockall, and ≥5 for full Rockall were optimal at predicting death, with sensitivities of 65.8-78.6% and specificities of 65.0-65.3%. No score was helpful at predicting rebleeding or length of stay.CONCLUSIONS: The Glasgow Blatchford score has high accuracy at predicting need for hospital based intervention or death. Scores of ≤1 appear the optimum threshold for directing patients to outpatient management. AUROCs of scores for the other endpoints are less than 0.80, therefore their clinical utility for these outcomes seems to be limited.Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16235737.
Scoring Systems Used to Predict Mortality in Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ED

Yuedong Tang,Jie Shen,Feng Zhang,Xiaoyong Zhou,Zhongyan Tang,Tingting You

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.053

2018-01-01

Abstract:Objective: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a potentially life-threatening condition that requires rapid assessment in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to compare the performance of the AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford (Blatchford), preendoscopic Rockall (pre-Rockall), and preendoscopic Baylor bleeding (pre-Baylor) scores in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with acute UGIB in the ED setting. Methods: Consecutive patients with acute UGIB who were admitted to the ED ward during 2012-2016 were retrospectively recruited. Data were retrieved from the admission list of the ED using international classification of disease codes via computer registration. The predictive accuracy of these four scores was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) method. Results: Among the 395 patients included during the study period, the total 30-day mortality ratewas 10.4% (41/ 395). The AIMS65 and Glasgow-Blatchford scores performed better with an AUC of 0.907 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.852-0.963; P < 0.001) and 0.870 (95% confidence interval, 0.833-0.902; P < 0.001) compared with other scoring systems (preendoscopic Rockall score: AUC, 0.709; 95% CI, 0.635-0.784; P < 0.001; preendoscopic Baylor score: AUC, 0.523; 95% CI, 0.472-0.573; P < 0.05). Conclusion: In patientswith acute UGIB in the ED, the AIMS65 and Glasgow-Blatchford scores are clinicallymore useful for predicting 30-day mortality than the preendoscopic Rockall and preendoscopic Baylor scores. The AIMS65 score might be more ideal for risk stratification in the ED setting. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Risk Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Chenyang Li,Enqiang Linghu,Chao Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3111414

IF: 2

2024-03-21

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Abstract:Purpose. Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) is a common emergency in gastroenterology. Currently, there is insufficient information to predict adverse outcomes in patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Our study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness of the clinical risk scores currently utilized and their ability to predict significant outcomes in lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods. We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients who were admitted to ALGIB and underwent colonoscopy or angiography at a single center between January 2018 and December 2022. Adverse outcomes associated with ALGIB included rebleeding, blood transfusion, hemostatic interventions, and in-hospital death. We calculated six risk scores at admission (Oakland, Birmingham, SHA2PE, Ramaekers, SALGIB, and CNUH-5). We measured the accuracy of these scores using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared them with DeLong’s test. Results. 123 patients with confirmed LGIB (aged 65 years, 55-75) were finally included. The most common diagnoses were colorectal cancer (25%) and hemorrhoids (14%). All scores demonstrated sufficient and comparable effectiveness for hemostatic intervention but no discrimination for rebleeding. The Oakland and SALGIB scores were superior to the other scores in predicting blood transfusion (AUC: 0.97 and 0.95, respectively; p = 0.208 ) and any adverse outcomes (AUC: 0.78 and 0.78, respectively; p = 0.854 ). Conclusions. The Oakland and SALGIB scores outperform the other scores in predicting the requirement for blood transfusion in ALGIB patients, but no single prediction tool had the best ability across all outcomes. Novel risk stratification scores with higher performance are needed for better risk stratification in ALGIB.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Prealbumin and D-dimer as Prognostic Indicators for Rebleeding in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Yue Wenjie,Liu Yi,Jiang Weiru,Huang Jianping,Liu Jie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06420-1

2020-01-01

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Abstract:Determining the risk stratification of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) plays a vital role in treating upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Traditional scores like Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS), Rockall score (RS), and AIMS65 score have been widely utilized in UGIB practice, however exhibiting limited practical use due to relative lack of user-friendly characters. Prealbumin as a nutritional indicator and d-dimer as a fibrinolytic activity monitor, are generally used to evaluate the overall nutritional and fibrinolytic condition in UGIB patients. Here, we explored the predictive value of these two markers in NVUGIB for evaluating severity and prognosis including rebleeding and surgery intervention. One hundred and eighty-five patients suffering NVUGIB were enrolled. Their GBS, RS, and AIMS65 score, routine laboratory test results including prealbumin and d-dimer were determined after admission. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to define the independent predictors of rebleeding. ROC curves were generated to compare the suitability of prealbumin, d-dimer, and scores for rebleeding prediction. The NVUGIB patients with rebleeding exhibited higher scores, white blood cell counts, d-dimer, CRP, proportion of surgery intervention, and longer hospital stay, but lower hematocrit, hemoglobin, calcium, prealbumin, and fibrinogen than those without rebleeding. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that prealbumin and d-dimer were independent predictors for rebleeding. Values of prealbumin and d-dimer were correlated with hospital stay, ulcer degrees, and surgery demand. The ROC curve analyses showed that prealbumin and d-dimer exhibited superior prediction value over the scoring systems. Prealbumin and d-dimer are promising predictors for severity and prognosis in NVUGIB practice.
Simulation of interface roughness in DGMOSFETs using non-equilibrium Green's functions

J. Fonseca,S. Kaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDRS.2003.1272238

2003-12-10

Abstract:In the sub-50 nm scale, the aggressive scaling of MOSFETs is expected to culminate in dual-gate (DG) architectures on SOI substrates. DGMOSFETs are widely accepted to be the ultimate design that silicon can deliver in terms of on and off currents (B. Yu, JEDM Tech. Dig. p. 937, 2001; K. Kim and J. Fossum, IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev., p. 2861, 2001). So far, the design efforts on these novel structures have concentrated on ideal geometries and doping profiles. However, at nanometer scale, current fabrication techniques cannot deliver perfect reproductions of the ideal design and suffer significantly from fluctuation effects associated with random doping and interfaces. It has thus become clear that accurate models for DGMOSFETs must account for interfaces beyond a planar division. In this work, we employ a modified nanoMOS simulator based on the non-equilibrium Green's function (NEGF) to model DGMOSFETs with rough interfaces.
ABC score: a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicentre study

Stig Borbjerg Laursen,Kathryn Oakland,Loren Laine,Vered Bieber,Riccardo Marmo,Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo,Harry R Dalton,Jeffrey Ngu,Michael Schultz,Marco Soncini,Ian Gralnek,Vipul Jairath,Iain A Murray,Adrian J Stanley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320002

IF: 24.5

2020-07-28

Gut

Abstract:Objectives Existing scores are not accurate at predicting mortality in upper (UGIB) and lower (LGIB) gastrointestinal bleeding. We aimed to develop and validate a new pre-endoscopy score for predicting mortality in both UGIB and LGIB. Design and setting International cohort study. Patients presenting to hospital with UGIB at six international centres were used to develop a risk score for predicting mortality using regression analyses. The score’s performance in UGIB and LGIB was externally validated and compared with existing scores using four international datasets. We calculated areas under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs), sensitivities, specificities and outcome among patients classified as low risk and high risk. Participants and results We included 3012 UGIB patients in the development cohort, and 4019 UGIB and 2336 LGIB patients in the validation cohorts. Age, Blood tests and Comorbidities (ABC) score was closer associated with mortality in UGIB and LGIB (AUROCs: 0.81–84) than existing scores (AUROCs: 0.65–0.75; p≤0.02). In UGIB, patients with low ABC score (≤3), medium ABC score (4–7) and high ABC score (≥8) had 30-day mortality rates of 1.0%, 7.0% and 25%, respectively. Patients classified low risk using ABC score had lower mortality than those classified low risk with AIMS65 (threshold ≤1) (1.0 vs 4.5%; p<0.001). In LGIB, patients with low, medium and high ABC scores had in-hospital mortality rates of 0.6%, 6.3% and 18%, respectively. Conclusions In contrast to previous scores, ABC score has good performance for predicting mortality in both UGIB and LGIB, allowing early identification and targeted management of patients at high or low risk of death.

gastroenterology & hepatology
AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Min Seong Kim,Jeongmin Choi,Won Chang Shin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1051-8

2019-07-26

BMC Gastroenterology

Abstract:<h3 class="Heading">Background</h3><p class="Para">Risk stratification for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (NVUGI) bleeding is crucial for successful prognosis and treatment. Recently, the AIMS65 score has been used to predict mortality risk and rebleeding. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), Rockall score, and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in Korea.</p><h3 class="Heading">Methods</h3><p class="Para">We retrospectively studied 512 patients with NVUGI bleeding who were treated at a university hospital between 2013 and 2016. The AIMS65, GBS, Rockall score, and pre-endoscopic Rockall score were used to stratify patients based on their bleeding risk. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were composite clinical outcomes of mortality, rebleeding, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Each scoring system was compared using the receiver-operating curve (ROC).</p><h3 class="Heading">Results</h3><p class="Para">A total of 17 patients (3.3%) died and rebleeding developed in 65 patients (12.7%). Eighty-six patients (16.8%) required ICU admission. The AIMS65 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.84, 95% confidence interval, 0.81–0.88)) seemed to be superior to the GBS (AUC 0.72, 0.68–0.76), the Rockall score (AUC 0.75, 0.71–0.79), or the pre-endoscopic Rockall score (AUC 0.74, 0.70–0.78) in predicting in-hospital mortality, but there was not a statistically significant difference between the groups (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">P</em> = 0.07). The AUC value of the AIMS65 was not significantly different from the other scoring systems in prediction of rebleeding, endoscopic intervention, or ICU admission.</p><h3 class="Heading">Conclusions</h3><p class="Para">The AIMS65 score in NVUGI bleeding patients was comparable to the GBS or Rockall scoring systems when predicting the mortality, rebleeding, or ICU admission. Because AIMS65 is a much easier, readily calculated scoring system compared to the others, we would recommend using the AIMS65 in daily practice.</p>

gastroenterology & hepatology
Nesting Success of Grassland Birds in Shinnery Oak Communities Treated with Tebuthiuron and Grazing in Eastern New Mexico

Lindsay A. Smythe,D. Haukos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1894/MH-30.1

2009-05-21

Abstract:Abstract Sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii) communities, a major component of grassland habitat of birds in eastern New Mexico, frequently are managed with livestock grazing and herbicide application for control of shrubs. We examined nest density, nest-site selection, and daily rate of survival of nests of grassland birds among four combinations of treatments with tebuthiuron (0.75 kg/ha) and a short-duration, rotational-grazing system being used to restore sand shinnery oak communities in eastern New Mexico. During breeding seasons 2004 and 2005, we searched 4-ha subplots in four tebuthiuron-grazing-combination replicates for nests, measured vertical and overhead cover at each nest site and an associated random point, and estimated daily rate of survival of nests using program MARK. Density of nests was similar among all treatments but greater in 2005 than 2004. Although vertical cover differed among treatments and between years, it did not affect selection or success of nest sites. Overhead cover also differed among treatments and between years. Birds selected nest sites with greater overhead cover but this did not influence success of nest, which was low in all treatments. During incubation, daily survival of nests was greater in untreated plots; however, during the nestling period, daily survival of nests was greater in tebuthiuron-treated plots. Neither tebuthiuron nor grazing treatment appeared to adversely affect density of nests of grassland birds or success for the species studied, but the low daily rate of survival of nests in this community bears further investigation.
Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China

Lei Gu,Fei Xu,Jie Yuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0828-5

2018-06-28

Abstract:Background: This study aims to compare the performance of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford (GBS) and Rockall scores (RS) in predicting the death risk among emergency-hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in regional China. Methods: A retrospective study was implemented between January 2014 and December 2015. Eligible participants were those who were hospitalized with UGIB. The outcome variable was in-hospital death, while explanatory variables were AIMS65, GBS and RS scores. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated to assess the association of AIMS65, GBS and RS with death risk using multivariate logistic regression models. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of three scoring systems were computed to compare their predictive power. Results: Among 799 UGIB participants, 674 were non-variceal bleeding (NVUGIB) and 125 variceal bleeding (VUGIB) patients. AIMS65 (OR = 14.72, 95% CI = 6.48, 33.43) and RS (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.20, 2.13) were positively associated with the risk of in-hospital death. Moreover, AIMS65 (AUC = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84, 0.98) performed the best in predicting in-hospital death, followed by RS (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.72, 0.86) and GBS (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.83) among overall UGIB participants. AIMS65 was also the best indicator to predict in-hospital death among either NVUGIB participants (AUC = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80, 0.98) or VUGIB participants (AUC = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89, 1.00). Conclusions: AIMS65, GBS and RS scoring approaches were all acceptable for predicting in-hospital death among UGIB patients irrespective of the subtype of UGIB in China. The AIMS65 might be the most powerful predictor.
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-ulcer and Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Risk Prediction Using a Scoring System

Hyun Woo Park,Seong Woo Jeon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5255-5

Abstract:Background and aims: Compared with ulcer bleeding (UB) in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB), non-ulcer bleeding (NUB) is often considered to have a low risk of poor outcomes and is treated less intensively without any risk stratification. We conducted this study to assess the predictability of scoring systems for NUB and compare the outcomes of NUB and UB. Methods: A total of 1831 UGIB patients were registered in the database during the period from February 2011 to December 2013. Among them, 1424 patients with NVUGIB were divided into two groups: Group UB (1101 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding) and Group NUB (323 patients with non-peptic ulcer-related bleeding). Results: The most common cause of bleeding in Group NUB was Mallory-Weiss tears (51.1%), followed by Dieulafoy lesions (18.9%). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the pre-Rockall score [area under the ROC (AUROC) = 0.798; 95% CI 0.707-0.890] and full Rockall score (AUROC = 0.794; 95% CI 0.693-0.895) were relatively good at predicting overall mortality in NUB. Glasgow-Blatchford score (AUROC = 0.783; 95% CI 0.730-0.836) was the most closely correlated with the need for clinical intervention in NUB. Those who had Glasgow-Blatchford score of 0 did not require any interventions, including blood transfusions. There were no statistical differences in overall mortality (p = 0.387), bleeding-related mortality (p = 0.447), or the incidence of re-bleeding (p = 0.117) between the two groups. Conclusions: Scoring systems are useful to predict mortality and the need for clinical intervention in patients with NUB.
Antithrombotic drugs and non-variceal bleeding outcomes and risk scoring systems: comparison of Glasgow Blatchford, Rockall and Charlson scores

Ali S Taha,Caroline McCloskey,Theresa Craigen,Wilson J Angerson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2015-100671

Abstract:Objectives: Antithrombotic drugs (ATDs) cause non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Risk scoring systems have not been validated in ATD users. We compared Blatchford, Rockall and Charlson scores in predicting outcomes of NVUGIB in ATD users and controls. Methods: A total of 2071 patients with NVUGIB were grouped into ATD users (n=851) and controls (n=1220) in a single-centre retrospective analysis. Outcomes included duration of hospital admission, the need for blood transfusion, rebleeding requiring surgery and 30-day mortality. Results: Duration of admission correlated with all scores in controls, but correlations were significantly weaker in ATD users. Rank correlation coefficients in control versus ATD: 0.45 vs 0.20 for Blatchford; 0.48 vs 0.32 for Rockall and 0.42 vs 0.26 for Charlson (all p<0.001). The need for transfusion was best predicted by Blatchford (p<0.001 vs Rockall and Charlson in both ATD users and controls), but all scores performed less well in ATD users. Area under the receiver operation characteristic curve (AUC) in control versus ATD: 0.90 vs 0.85 for Blatchford; 0.77 vs 0.61 for Rockall and 0.69 vs 0.56 for Charlson (all p<0.005). In predicting surgery, Rockall performed best; while mortality was best predicted by Charlson with lower AUCs in ATD patients than controls (p<0.05). Stratification showed the scores' performance to be age-dependent. Conclusions: Blatchford score was the strongest predictor of transfusion, Rockall's had the strongest correlation with duration of admission and with rebleeding requiring surgery and Charlson was best in predicting 30-day mortality. Modifications of these systems should be explored to improve their efficiency in ATD users.
Comparative diagnostic utility of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Landon Kozai,Arvin Tan,Kevin Nebrejas,Yoshito Nishimura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002867

2024-10-11

Abstract:Introduction: The Rockall score and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) are two scoring systems validated in the evaluation of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, no meta-analysis exists to summarize the current data and clarify the use of Rockall score and GBS focusing on non-variceal UGIB. We aimed to evaluate and compare the utility of the Rockall score and GBS in predicting clinical outcomes in non-variceal UGIB. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for all peer-reviewed articles using the terms including 'Glasgow-Blatchford', 'Rockall', and 'gastrointestinal bleed' from their inception to 22 March 2023. Outcomes included mortality, rebleeding, need for blood transfusion, and need for surgical intervention. Results: Seven studies with 755 participants with non-variceal bleeding were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis demonstrated no difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) between GBS and Rockall score to predict mortality [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.06 to 0.08] or rebleeding (WMD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.11). GBS had a higher AUROC to predict the outcomes compared to Rockall score for the needs for transfusion (WMD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.16) and surgical intervention (WMD = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14-0.29). Conclusion: The GBS could be superior to the Rockall score in predicting the needs for transfusion and surgical intervention in non-variceal UGIB. However, both scores demonstrate low performance for predicting mortality or rebleeding.
The prognostic evaluation of ALBI score in endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric varices hemorrhage in liver cirrhosis

Yuhua Liu,Shengnan Wu,Shanshan Cai,Bushan Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50629-9

IF: 4.6

2024-01-09

Scientific Reports

Abstract:To analyze the independent risk factors for recurrent bleeding and death within 1 year after endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric varices hemorrhage (EGVB) in patients with liver cirrhosis, and to validate the predictive value of ALBI score for recurrent bleeding and death within 1 year after endoscopic treatment of EGVB in patients with liver cirrhosis. A total of 338 patients with EGVB who received endoscopic treatment for the first time in the Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 1, 2016 to March 1, 2020 were selected. A database was established to analyze the patients' demographic data, surgical variables and postoperative outcomes. All patients were contacted and followed up to verify the predictive value of ALBI score for recurrent bleeding and mortality. 130 patients had rebleeding within 1 year after surgery (38.5%). 66 patients died within 1 year after surgery (19.5%). Patients with ALBI grade 3 had significantly higher rebleeding and mortality rates than those with grades 1 and 2. The AUC was used to compare the predictive value of the four scores for rebleeding and mortality within one year after endoscopic surgery. Both ALBI scores had the largest AUC. The ALBI score has certain predictive value for rebleeding and mortality within 1 year after endoscopic therapy in patients with cirrhotic EGVB.

multidisciplinary sciences

Effect of reactive oxygen intermediates and antioxidants on proliferation and function of T lymphocytes.

Application of Rockall Risk Scoring System in Patients with Acute Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Which scoring system should be used for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding? Old or new?

Predictive utility of the Rockall scoring system in patients suffering from acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage

Clinical model for predicting rebleeding within 30 days after transcatheter arterial embolization for treating acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Comparison Of The Glasgow-Blatchford And Rockall Scores For Prediction Of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Outcomes In Chinese Patients

Risk Factors for Predicting Early Variceal Rebleeding after Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

Comparison and validation of several scoring systems for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study

Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study

Scoring Systems Used to Predict Mortality in Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ED

Comparison of Risk Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Prealbumin and D-dimer as Prognostic Indicators for Rebleeding in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Simulation of interface roughness in DGMOSFETs using non-equilibrium Green's functions

ABC score: a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicentre study

AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Nesting Success of Grassland Birds in Shinnery Oak Communities Treated with Tebuthiuron and Grazing in Eastern New Mexico

Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-ulcer and Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Risk Prediction Using a Scoring System

Antithrombotic drugs and non-variceal bleeding outcomes and risk scoring systems: comparison of Glasgow Blatchford, Rockall and Charlson scores

Comparative diagnostic utility of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The prognostic evaluation of ALBI score in endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric varices hemorrhage in liver cirrhosis