Committee on Surgical Combat Casualty Care position statement: Neurosurgical capability for the optimal management of traumatic brain injury during deployed operations

Jennifer M Gurney,Matthew D Tadlock,Bradley A Dengler,Brian J Gavitt,Michael S Dirks,John B Holcomb,Russ S Kotwal,Linda C Benavides,Jeremy W Cannon,Theodore Edson,John C Graybill,Brian J Sonka,Donald W Marion,Matthew J Eckert,Martin A Schreiber,Travis M Polk,Shane D Jensen,Commentaries Provided by: Matthew J. Martin, MD, FACS, DABA, Bellal A. Joseph, MD, FACS, Alex Valadka, MD, FAANS, FACS, and Jeffrey D. Kerby, MD, PhD, FACS,Matthew J Martin,Bellal A Joseph,Alex Valadka,Jeffrey D Kerby
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004058
2023-08-01
Abstract:Background: Experiences over the last three decades of war have demonstrated a high incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) resulting in a persistent need for a neurosurgical capability within the deployed theater of operations. Despite this, no doctrinal requirement for a deployed neurosurgical capability exists. Through an iterative process, the Joint Trauma System Committee on Surgical Combat Casualty Care (CoSCCC) developed a position statement to inform medical and nonmedical military leaders about the risks of the lack of a specialized neurosurgical capability. Methods: The need for deployed neurosurgical capability position statement was identified during the spring 2021 CoSCCC meeting. A triservice working group of experienced forward-deployed caregivers developed a preliminary statement. An extensive iterative review process was then conducted to ensure that the intended messaging was clear to senior medical leaders and operational commanders. To provide additional context and a civilian perspective, statement commentaries were solicited from civilian clinical experts including a recently retired military trauma surgeon boarded in neurocritical care, a trauma surgeon instrumental in developing the Brain Injury Guidelines, a practicing neurosurgeon with world-renowned expertise in TBI, and the chair of the Committee on Trauma. Results: After multiple revisions, the position statement was finalized, and approved by the CoSCCC membership in February 2023. Challenges identified include (1) military neurosurgeon attrition, (2) the lack of a doctrinal neurosurgical capabilities requirement during deployed combat operations, and (3) the need for neurosurgical telemedicine capability and in-theater computed tomography scans to triage TBI casualties requiring neurosurgical care. Conclusion: Challenges identified regarding neurosurgical capabilities within the deployed trauma system include military neurosurgeon attrition and the lack of a doctrinal requirement for neurosurgical capability during deployed combat operations. To mitigate risk to the force in a future peer-peer conflict, several evidence-based recommendations are made. The solicited civilian commentaries strengthen these recommendations by putting them into the context of civilian TBI management. This neurosurgical capabilities position statement is intended to be a forcing function and a communication tool to inform operational commanders and military medical leaders on the use of these teams on current and future battlefields. Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level V.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?