Abstract:Background: Vascular pathologies of the head and neck are rare but can present as musculoskeletal problems. The International Federation of Orthopedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) Cervical Framework (Framework) aims to assist evidence-based clinical reasoning for safe assessment and management of the cervical spine considering potential for vascular pathology. Clinical reasoning is critical to physiotherapy, and developing high-level clinical reasoning is a priority for postgraduate (post-licensure) educational programs. Objective: To explore the influence of the Framework on clinical reasoning processes in postgraduate physiotherapy students. Methods: Qualitative case study design using think aloud methodology and interpretive description, informed by COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research. Participants were postgraduate musculoskeletal physiotherapy students who learned about the Framework through standardized delivery. Two cervical spine cases explored clinical reasoning processes. Coding and analysis of transcripts were guided by Elstein's diagnostic reasoning components and the Postgraduate Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Practice model. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis (inductive and deductive) for individuals and then across participants, enabling analysis of key steps in clinical reasoning processes and use of the Framework. Trustworthiness was enhanced with multiple strategies (e.g., second researcher challenged codes). Results: For all participants (n = 8), the Framework supported clinical reasoning using primarily hypothetico-deductive processes. It informed vascular hypothesis generation in the patient history and testing the vascular hypothesis through patient history questions and selection of physical examination tests, to inform clarity and support for diagnosis and management. Most participant's clinical reasoning processes were characterized by high-level features (e.g., prioritization), however there was a continuum of proficiency. Clinical reasoning processes were informed by deep knowledge of the Framework integrated with a breadth of wider knowledge and supported by a range of personal characteristics (e.g., reflection). Conclusions: Findings support use of the Framework as an educational resource in postgraduate physiotherapy programs to inform clinical reasoning processes for safe and effective assessment and management of cervical spine presentations considering potential for vascular pathology. Individualized approaches may be required to support students, owing to a continuum of clinical reasoning proficiency. Future research is required to explore use of the Framework to inform clinical reasoning processes in learners at different levels.

Synthesis and biological characterization of human monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP‐1) and its analogs

Primary health care case management through the lens of complexity: an exploratory study of naturopathic practice using complexity science principles

Exploring why individuals utilise naturopathic treatment and choose to combine naturopathy with biomedicine

The advanced nurse practitioner in context: Systemic processes

Sector conditions for the global stability of high-speed communication networks

Use of the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework to inform clinical reasoning in postgraduate level physiotherapy students: a qualitative study using think aloud methodology

Patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: a constructivist grounded theory study

Syncing Our Global Thinking: A Framework for Contextualized Clinical Reasoning

Cross correlation and energy detection in multiarray processing

Exploring strategies to improve clinical decision making in a chiropractic office: a case series

Naturalistic Decision Making and the Practice of Health Care

Collaborative framework to assess achievement of American Association of Colleges of Nursing and National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties patient-centered competencies using evolving case studies

Clinician experience of being interprofessional: an interpretive phenomenological analysis

[The Solenopsis saevissima complex in South America (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)].

Coexistence of filariasis with carcinoma breast - An incidental cytological finding.

Development of Interprofessional Competencies Through the Process of Collaborative Clinical Reasoning: A Qualitative Study

Models for the Study of Whole Systems

Aligning intuition and theory: a novel approach to identifying the determinants of behaviours necessary to support implementation of evidence into practice

Clinical practice enhanced by interdisciplinary theoretical perspectives

Using practical wisdom to facilitate ethical decision-making: a major empirical study of phronesis in the decision narratives of doctors

Quest. Data protection.