Utilizing International Classification of Diseases Codes to Identify Shoulder Dystocia and Neonatal Brachial Plexus Injury

Alicia E Hersey,Stephen M Wagner,Megha Gupta,Kate Chang,Lynda Yang,Suneet P Chauhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.04.002

Abstract:Background: The utilization of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth Revision, (ICD-9/10) coding to identify the incidence of disease is frequently performed in medical research. This study attempts to assess the validity of using ICD-9/10 codes to identify patients with shoulder dystocia (SD) with concurrent neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP). Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients evaluated at the University of Michigan Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Program (UM-BP/PN) from 2004 to 2018. We reported the percentage of patients with reported NBPP ICD-9/10 and SD ICD-9/10 discharged at birth who were later diagnosed with NBPP by a specialty clinic by interdisciplinary faculty and staff utilizing physical evaluations and ancillary testing such as such as electrodiagnostics and imaging. The relationship of reported NBPP ICD-9/10, SD ICD-9/10, extent of NBPP nerve involvement, and NBPP persistence at age two years were examined via chi-square or Fischer exact test. Results: Of the 51 mother-infant dyads with complete birth discharge records evaluated at the UM-BP/PN, 26 (51%) were discharged without an ICD-9/10 code documenting NBPP; of these 26 patients, only four had ICD-9/10 documentation of SD at discharge, which left 22 patients with no ICD-9/10 code documentation of either SD or NBPP (43%). Patients with pan-plexopathy were more likely to be discharged with an NBBP ICD-9/10 code than those infants with upper nerve involvement (77% vs 39%, P < 0.02). Conclusion: Use of ICD-9/10 codes for the identification of NBPP appears to undercount the true incidence. This underestimation is more pronounced for milder forms of NBPP.