Abstract:Background. Online, algorithmically driven prognostic tools are increasingly important in medical decision making. Institutions developing such tools need to be able to communicate the precision and accuracy of the information in a trustworthy manner, and so many attempt to communicate uncertainties but also use institutional logos to underscore their trustworthiness. Bringing together theories on trust, uncertainty, and psychological distance in a novel way, we tested whether and how the communication of uncertainty and the presence of institutional logos together affected trust in medical information, the prognostic tool itself, and treatment decisions. Methods. A pilot and 2 online experiments in which UK (experiment 1) and worldwide (experiment 2) participants (Ntotal = 4,724) were randomized to 1 of 12 arms in a 3 (uncertainty cue) × 4 (institutional cue) between-subjects design. The stimulus was based on an existing medical prognostic tool. Results. Institutional trust was consistently associated with trust in the prognostic tool itself, while uncertainty information had no consistent effect. Institutional trust predicted the amount of weight participants reported placing on institutional endorsements in their decision making and the likelihood of switching from passive to active treatment in a hypothetical scenario. There was also a significant effect of psychological distance to (perceived hypotheticality of) the scenario. Conclusions/Implications. These results underline the importance of institutions demonstrating trustworthiness and building trust with their users. They also suggest that users tend to be insensitive to communications of uncertainty and that communicators may need to be highly explicit when attempting to warn of low precision or quality of evidence. The effect of the perceived hypotheticality of the scenario underscores the importance of realistic decision-making scenarios for studies and the role of familiarity with the decision dilemma generally. Highlights: In a world where information for medical decision making is increasingly going to be provided through digital, online tools, institutions providing such tools need guidance on how best to communicate about their trustworthiness and precision.We find that people are fairly insensitive to cues designed to communicate uncertainty around the outputs of such tools. Even putting "ATTENTION" in bold font or explicitly pointing out the weaknesses in the data did not appear to affect people's decision making using the tool's outputs. Institutions should take note, and further work is required to determine how best to communicate uncertainty in a way that elicits appropriate caution in lay users.People were much more sensitive to institutional logos associated with the outputs. Generalized institutional trust (rather than trust in the specific institution whose logo was shown) was associated with how trustworthy, accurate, and reliable the tool, its algorithm, and the numbers it produced were perceived to be. This underscores the role of societal trust in institutions at large.Finally, as a note to researchers, we found a significant effect of how hypothetical or believable participants felt the experimental scenario was. This is a variable that seems rarely controlled for in studies and yet played as much of a role as some of our variables of interest, so we suggest that it is measured in future experiments.

Photoionisation cross section for He in the hyperspherical coordinate method

Trusting information on cancer varies by source of information and political viewpoint

Partisan Media, Trust, and Media Literacy: Regression Analysis of Predictors of COVID-19 Knowledge

Interpersonal Risk Communication Matters More Than Media Risk Communication in Its Impact on Individuals' Trust and Preventive Behaviors During COVID-19.

Conflict among experts in health recommendations and corresponding public trust in health experts

Treatment of brewery slurry in thermophilic anaerobic sequencing batch reactor.

Beyond Political Ideology: The Impact of Attitudes Towards Government and Corporations on Trust in Science

Measuring trust in medical researchers

(E)-2-Benzylidenecyclanones: part XIV. Study on interaction of some (E)-2-benzylidenebenzosuberone derivatives with calf thymus DNA by TLC and UV–Vis methods, a DNA cleavage study

Vulnerability to the Effects of Conflicting Health Information: Testing the Moderating Roles of Trust in News Media and Research Literacy

How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework

The effect of seeing scientists as intellectually humble on trust in scientists and their research

What Affects Perceived Trustworthiness of Online Medical Information and Subsequent Treatment Decision Making? Randomized Trials on the Role of Uncertainty and Institutional Cues

The enduring effect of scientific interest on trust in climate scientists in the United States

Trust in COVID-19 Information from Different Media Types and Its Association with Preventive Measures Adoption in the U.S.

Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative

Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news media

Computations for various edge configurations with the hybrid Finite Element - Boundary Integral - Multilevel Fast Multipole - uniform geometrical theory of diffraction method including double diffraction

Health Literacy and Use and Trust in Health Information

The role of Science Literacy, Trust, and Impulsivity on Adherence to COVID-19 Recommendations: Cross-sectional Study (Preprint)

Filopodia formation driven by membrane glycoprotein M6a depends on the interaction of its transmembrane domains