Thrombolysis for Wake-Up Stroke Versus Non–Wake-Up Unwitnessed Stroke: EOS Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
Naruhiko Kamogawa,Kaori Miwa,Kazunori Toyoda,Märit Jensen,Manabu Inoue,Sohei Yoshimura,Mayumi Fukuda-Doi,Takanari Kitazono,Florent Boutitie,Henry Ma,Peter Ringleb,Ona Wu,Lee H Schwamm,Steven Warach,Werner Hacke,Stephen M Davis,Geoffrey A Donnan,Christian Gerloff,Götz Thomalla,Masatoshi Koga,Naruhiko KamogawaKaori MiwaKazunori ToyodaMärit JensenManabu InoueSohei YoshimuraMayumi Fukuda-DoiTakanari KitazonoFlorent BoutitieHenry MaPeter RinglebOna WuLee H. SchwammSteven WarachWerner HackeStephen M. DavisGeoffrey A. DonnanChristian GerloffGötz ThomallaMasatoshi KogaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine,National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center,Suita,Japan (N.K.,K.M.,K.T.,M.I.,S.Y.,M.K.).Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie,Kopf- und Neurozentrum,Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf,Germany (M.J.,C.G.,G.T.).Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Sciences,National Cerebral,and Cardiovascular Center,Suita,Japan (M.F.-D.).Department of Medicine and Clinical Science,Graduate School of Medical Sciences,Kyushu University,Fukuoka,Japan (T.K.).Hospices Civils de Lyon,Service de Biostatistique,France (F.B.).Villeurbanne,France; Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive,Equipe Biostatistique-Santé,Villeurbanne,France (F.B.).Department of Medicine,School of Clinical Sciences,Monash University,Melbourne,VIC,Australia (H.M.). Department of Neurology,University of Heidelberg,Germany (P.R.,W.H.).Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging,Department of Radiology,Massachusetts General Hospital,Charlestown (O.W.).Department of Neurology,Massachusetts General Hospital,Boston (L.H.S.).Dell Medical School,University of Texas at Austin (S.W.).Departments of Medicine and Neurology,Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital,the University of Melbourne,VIC,Australia (S.M.D.,G.A.D.).,on behalf of Evaluation of Unknown Onset Stroke Thrombolysis Trials (EOS) Investigators
Bastian Cheng
Martin Bendszus
Christopher Bladin
Leonid Churilov
Brunce Campbell
Mark Parsons
Nawaf Yassi
Martin Ebinger
Matthias Endres
Jochen B. Fiebach
Timothy Kleinig
Lawrence Latour
Robin Lemmens
Christopher Levi
Didier Leys
Carlos Molina
Keith Muir
Norbert Nighoghossian
Salvador Pedraza
Peter D. Schellinger
Stefan Schwab
Claus Z. Simonsen
Shlee S. Song
Vincent Thijs
Danilo Toni
Chung Y. Hsu
Nils Wahlgren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.123.043358
IF: 10.17
2024-03-10
Stroke
Abstract:Stroke, Ahead of Print. Background:Stroke with unknown time of onset can be categorized into 2 groups; wake-up stroke (WUS) and unwitnessed stroke with an onset time unavailable for reasons other than wake-up (non–wake-up unwitnessed stroke, non-WUS). We aimed to assess potential differences in the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) between these subgroups.Methods:Patients with an unknown-onset stroke were evaluated using individual patient-level data of 2 randomized controlled trials (WAKE-UP [Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke], THAWS [Thrombolysis for Acute Wake-Up and Unclear-Onset Strokes With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg]) comparing IVT with placebo or standard treatment from the EOS (Evaluation of Unknown-Onset Stroke Thrombolysis trial) data set. A favorable outcome was prespecified as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 22 to 36 hours and 90-day mortality. The IVT effect was compared between the treatment groups in the WUS and non-WUS with multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results:Six hundred thirty-four patients from 2 trials were analyzed; 542 had WUS (191 women, 272 receiving alteplase), and 92 had non-WUS (42 women, 43 receiving alteplase). Overall, no significant interaction was noted between the mode of onset and treatment effect (Pvalue for interaction=0.796). In patients with WUS, the frequencies of favorable outcomes were 54.8% and 45.5% in the IVT and control groups, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01–2.16]). Death occurred in 4.0% and 1.9%, respectively (P=0.162), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 1.8% and 0.3%, respectively (P=0.194). In patients with non-WUS, no significant difference was observed in favorable outcomes relative to the control (37.2% versus 29.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [0.58–5.37]). One death and one symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were reported in the IVT group, but none in the control.Conclusions:There was no difference in the effect of IVT between patients with WUS and non-WUS. IVT showed a significant benefit in patients with WUS, while there was insufficient statistical power to detect a substantial benefit in the non-WUS subgroup.REGISTRATION:URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: CRD42020166903.
peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology