Abstract:Background: The volitional help sheet (VHS) for self-harm equips people with a means of responding automatically to triggers for self-harm with coping strategies. Although there is some evidence of its efficacy, improving acceptability and making the intervention available in a web-based format may be crucial to increasing effectiveness and reach. Objective: This study aims to use the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to explore the acceptability of the VHS, examine for whom and under what circumstances this intervention is more or less acceptable, and develop a series of recommendations for how the VHS can be used to support people in reducing repeat self-harm. Methods: We explored acceptability in two phases. First, our patient and public involvement partners evaluated the original VHS from a lived experience perspective, which was subsequently translated into a web-based format. Second, a representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom who had previously self-harmed were recruited via a YouGov survey (N=514) and were asked to rate the acceptability of the VHS based on the seven constructs of the TFA, namely, affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-tailed t tests, and binary logistic regression. A directed content analysis approach was used to analyze qualitative data. Results: Participants in the web-based survey rated the VHS as positive (affective attitude; t457=4.72; P<.001); were confident using it (self-efficacy; t457=9.54; P<.001); felt they did not have to give up any benefits, profits, or values when using it (opportunity costs; t439=-15.51; P<.001); understood it and how it worked (intervention coherence; t464=11.90; P<.001); and were confident that it would achieve its purpose (perceived effectiveness; t466=2.04; P=.04). The TFA domain burden appeared to be an important indicator of acceptability. Lower levels of perceived burden when using the VHS tool were more prevalent among younger adults aged 18-24 years (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.50-8.78), people of White ethnic background (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.06-8.613), and people without a long-term health condition (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.01-2.30). Perceived modifications to further improve acceptability included improved formatting (burden), the feature to add new situations and responses or amend existing ones (ethicality), and clearer instructions and further detail about the purpose of the VHS (intervention coherence). Conclusions: Our findings show high levels of acceptability among some people who have previously self-harmed, particularly among younger adults, people of White ethnic backgrounds, and people without long-term health conditions. Future research should aim to improve acceptability among older adults, people from minority ethnic groups, and people with long-term health conditions.

Exploring the content of self-help toolkits as an intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in young people in England

A Systematic Review of the Use, Acceptability, Perceived Effectiveness and Effectiveness of Self-Help Toolkits

Understanding the Needs of Young People Who Engage in Self-Harm: A Qualitative Investigation

Life problems in children and adolescents who self‐harm: findings from the multicentre study of self‐harm in England

Acceptability of a Brief Web-Based Theory-Based Intervention to Prevent and Reduce Self-harm: Mixed Methods Evaluation

Understanding experiences of the self-harm of others: A qualitative exploration of the views of young people with complex mental health needs

Understanding the Experience and Needs of School Counsellors When Working with Young People Who Engage in Self-Harm

'Our Care through Our Eyes'. Impact of a co-produced digital educational programme on nurses' knowledge, confidence and attitudes in providing care for children and young people who have self-harmed: a mixed-methods study in the UK

"The only way that they can access help quickly": a qualitative exploration of key stakeholders' perspectives on guided self-help interventions for children and young people with eating disorders

Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in low-income and middle-income countries: systematic review and theory of change

Residential staff responses to adolescent self-harm: The helpful and unhelpful

Scoping review: Alternatives to self‐harm recommended on mental health self‐help websites

Help-seeking behaviour and adolescent self-harm: A systematic review

Practitioner Review: Treatments for young people who self-harm - challenges and recommendations for research and clinical practice

Getting help early: An online mental health self-assessment tool for young people

Engaging families in the management of adolescent self-harm

Cost-effectiveness of psychological and psychosocial interventions for adults, children and young people who have self-harmed

A Brief Cognitive Analytic Therapy–Informed Approach for Young People That Have Self‐Injured (CATCH‐Y): A Case Series

Review: Interventions to prevent or manage self-harm among students in educational settings - a systematic review

Public Perceptions of Self-Harm: Perceived Motivations of (and Willingness to Help in Response to) Adolescent Self-Harm

The Effectivity of a School-Based Early Intervention Targeting Psychological Complaints and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Adolescents