Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Liposomal to Plain Bupivacaine in the Transversus Abdominis Plane for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Lyly Nguyen,Gabriella E Glassman,Ashkan Afshari,Xiaoke Feng,Uma Devi Shastri,Christodoulos Kaoutzanis,Matthew David McEvoy,Vik Bansal,Christopher Canlas,Julia Yao,Kye Higdon,Galen Perdikis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010710
2024-03-01
Abstract:Background: Pain control after autologous breast reconstruction is important for patient satisfaction and early recovery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are commonly used as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for breast reconstruction. It is uncertain whether liposomal bupivacaine used in TAP blocks offers additional advantages. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus plain bupivacaine for patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction. Methods: This double-blinded randomized controlled trial studied patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction between June of 2019 and August of 2020. Subjects were randomly assigned liposomal or plain bupivacaine, performed using ultrasound-guided TAP block technique. All patients were managed according to an ERAS protocol. Primary outcomes were postoperative narcotic analgesia required, measured in oral morphine equivalents from postoperative days 1 to 7. Secondary outcomes included numeric pain scale score on postoperative days 1 to 7, nonnarcotic pain medication use, time to first narcotic use, return of bowel function, and length of stay. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled: 30 received liposomal bupivacaine and 30 received plain bupivacaine. There were no significant differences in demographics, daily oral morphine equivalent narcotic use, nonnarcotic pain medication use, time to narcotic use, numeric pain scale score, time to bowel function, or length of stay. Conclusion: Liposomal bupivacaine does not confer advantages over plain bupivacaine when used in TAP blocks for abdominally based microvascular breast reconstruction in patients under ERAS protocols and multimodal approaches for pain control. Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, I.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?