Abstract:OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5-year survival rates and incidences of complications associated with ceramic abutments and to compare them with those of metal abutments.METHODS: An electronic Medline search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify randomized-controlled clinical trials, and prospective and retrospective studies providing information on ceramic and metal abutments with a mean follow-up time of at least 3 years. Patients had to have been examined clinically at the follow-up visit. Assessment of the identified studies and data abstraction was performed independently by three reviewers. Failure rates were analyzed using standard and random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5-year survival proportions.RESULTS: Twenty-nine clinical and 22 laboratory studies were selected from an initial yield of 7136 titles and data were extracted. The estimated 5-year survival rate of ceramic abutments was 99.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 93.8-99.9%] and 97.4% (95% CI: 96-98.3%) for metal abutments. The estimated cumulative incidence of technical complications after 5 years was 6.9% (95% CI: 3.5-13.4%) for ceramic abutments and 15.9% (95% CI: 11.6-21.5%) for metal abutments. Abutment screw loosening was the most frequent technical problem, occurring at an estimated cumulative incidence after 5 years of 5.1% (95% CI: 3.3-7.7%). All-ceramic crowns supported by ceramic abutments exhibited similar annual fracture rates as metal-ceramic crowns supported by metal abutments. The cumulative incidence of biological complications after 5 years was estimated at 5.2% (95% CI: 0.4-52%) for ceramic and 7.7% (95% CI: 4.7-12.5%) for metal abutments. Esthetic complications tended to be more frequent at metal abutments. A meta-analysis of the laboratory data was impossible due to the non-standardized test methods of the studies included.CONCLUSION: The 5-year survival rates estimated from annual failure rates appeared to be similar for ceramic and metal abutments. The information included in this review did not provide evidence for differences of the technical and biological outcomes of ceramic and metal abutments. However, the information for ceramic abutments was limited in the number of studies and abutments analyzed as well as the accrued follow-up time. Standardized methods for the analysis of abutment strength are needed.

Cumulative 10-year performance of endodontically treated teeth with prosthetic restorations of base metal alloy double crowns with friction pins-a retrospective study

A Retrospective Study of 12,538 Internal Conical Connection Implants Focused on the Long-Term Integrity of Implant-Abutment Complexes.

Outcome of Teeth Restored with CAD/CAM Zirconium Dioxide Post-Cores: a Retrospective Study with a Follow-Up Period of 3–6 Years

Ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions-a retrospective study

Survival and complication rates of tooth‐ and implant‐supported restorations after an observation period up to 36 years

Success Rates of Endocrown and Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth: A 46-Month Retrospective Study

The clinical performance of porcelain-fused-to-metal precious alloy single crowns: chipping, recurrent caries, periodontitis, and loss of retention

Evaluation of periodontal parameters on abutment teeth rehabilitated with single-unit crowns: A 12-month follow-up

Survival of Double Crown–Retained Implant-Tooth-Supported Removable Partial Dentures: A ≥ 5-Year Clinical Follow-up Study

Survival rates, patient satisfaction, and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: a 12-month prospective study

13-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study on zirconia and titanium abutments

Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite

Cemented versus screw‐retained posterior implant‐supported single crowns: A 24‐month randomized controlled clinical trial

[Clinical Evaluation of Residual Crowns and Roots Restored by Glass Fiber Post and Core, Cast Metal Post and Core or Directly].

A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions

Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns utilising the titanium base abutment: A 7.5-year prospective cohort study

Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Prosthetic complications with mandibular bar-retained implant overdentures having distal attachments and metal frameworks: A 2- to 12-year retrospective analysis

Long-term retention and survival of cemented implant-supported zirconia and metal-ceramic single crowns: A retrospective study

Fifteen-year recall period on zirconia-based single crowns and fixed dental prostheses. A prospective observational study

Prognosis of double crown-retained removable dental prostheses compared with clasp-retained removable dental prostheses: A retrospective study