Could myeloperoxidase represent a useful biomarker for erosive osteoarthritis of the hand?

A. Fioravanti,S. Tenti,L. Pulsatelli,O. Addimanda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2017.1386796
2018-01-29
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
Abstract:Erosive osteoarthritis of the hand (EHOA) represents a subset of osteoarthritis of the hand (HOA) that affects proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints. EHOA is characterized by acute onset, severe pain, functional limitation, and tissue swelling; it is generally recognized by radiographic central erosion with collapse of the subchondral bone and a so-called ‘gull-wing’ or ‘saw-tooth’ deformity (1, 2). Despite the presence of inflammatory symptoms and signs, laboratory findings are usually negative; controversial data have been reported about erythrocyte sedimentation rate and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (3). In a previous study, Punzi et al. demonstrated increases in myeloperoxidase (MPO) and in the nitrated form of type II collagen-derived fragments (Coll2-1NO2) in EHOA in comparison to non-erosive osteoarthritis of the hand (NEHOA) (4). The objective of the present study was to investigate the serum levels of MPO and hs-CRP and their possible relationship with the clinical and radiological findings in patients with EHOA and NEHOA. A total of 135 consecutive outpatients with HOA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (5) were enrolled in this study. We excluded subjects with other rheumatic diseases and those with a personal and/or familial history of psoriasis. All patients were examined by anteroposterior X-ray projection of both hands; EHOA was defined by the presence of at least one central erosion in PIP or DIP. On the basis of these criteria, 80 patients were included in the EHOA group and 55 in the NEHOA group. Twenty-five healthy subjects without finger joint pain and/or tenderness or finger nodes were considered as controls. Radiological evaluation was performed by two experimented readers according to the Kallman grading scale (6). All subjects signed an informed consent form and the study was approved by the local ethics committees. Human hs-CRP was detected by CircuLex high-sensitivity CRP enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (CycLex Co., Nagano, Japan) according to the user’s manual. The limit of detection of samples was 28.6 pg/mL. Serum MPO was measured by human MPO ELISA (BioVendor, Heidelberg, Germany) and followed the manufacturer’s instructions. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.4 ng/mL. The Mann–Whitney U-test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used for comparisons among groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?