Clinimetric Dilemmas in Outcome Scales for Mental Disorders
P. Bech
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000448810
2016-10-01
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Abstract:covered the outcome measure of patients with ordinary mental disorders. It was expected that the DSM-5 [7] would adopt the self-reported SCL-90 and the clinician-reported HAM-D, HAM-A, and BPRS [8] , but the editors of the DSM-5 found that the dimensional approach was too complicated, probably due to a lack of clinimetric understanding. Another dimensional instrument was also seriously considered by the editors of the DSM-5, namely the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), according to Greenberg [9] . The US National Institute of Health lay behind the PROMIS in an attempt to provide access to health outcomes in both somatic disorders and mental disorders, including psychosomatic disorders. PROMIS covers 5 health domains: physical functioning, social functioning, emotional distress, pain, and fatigue. The items are selected from these domain banks. For example, in the domain of emotional distress items measuring anxiety and depression are to be found in a bank from which the researcher can select items ordered according to the severity location of the dimension under measurement. This ordering of severity is based on clinimetric item response theory models [10] . However, the editors of the DSM-5 rejected PROMIS due to lack of sufficient evidence [9] . Another candidate for health outcome measures of somatic and mental disorders was developed by the International Consortium for In the mid-1950s, before the era of psychopharmacological drugs, Parloff et al. [1] designed an outcome scale by which all neurotic patients and all forms of psychotherapy could be clinimetrically compared. The items in this Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL) were selected to measure both bodily and mental distress, covering the symptoms people presented when seeking help at the outpatient clinic for psychotherapy at the University Hospital in Baltimore. In its original version the SCL contained 41 items (SCL-41). These were published by Bech [2] with permission from Jerry Frank. Over the 2 decades from 1954 to 1973 the SCL was enlarged to cover states of phobia, obsessive-compulsive states, depression, anxiety, and panic. The ultimate version, SCL-90 [3] , thus covered the psychopathological symptoms of the ordinary mental disorders (anxiety, depression, mania, and schizophrenia) but still had as its basic structure bodily distress or somatization, and emotional distress or interpersonal sensitivity. At the start of the psychopharmacological era in the 1960s, clinician-rated scales were preferred, as these were seen as fulfilling the requirements of the authorities for approval of the new antianxiety, antidepressant, or antipsychotic drugs. In this respect two Hamilton scales were developed – the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) [4] and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) [5] – as well as the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) [6] that Received: July 1, 2016 Accepted after revision: July 29, 2016 Published online: October 15, 2016