The “Pacemaker Syndrome” in a Properly Functioning Physiologic Pacing System

P. Levine,Jeffrey P. Seltzer,F. Pirzada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1983.tb04358.x
1983-03-01
Abstract:Manufacturers are introducing a multiplicity of dual-chamber pacing systems wbich, while markedly improving the patient's quality of life, have not yet eliminated all problems associated with cardiac pacing. The complexity and limitations of these systems combined with the lack of familiarity of many physicians with them raises additional concerns as to pacing system malfunction. Such a case was recently encountered. AP, a 29-year-old gentleman, was seen in consultation for nocturnal episodes of dizziness and pre-syncope. His cardiac history dated back three years when he developed persistent complete heart block of unknown etiology and presented with fatigue, effort intolerance and presyncope. A permanent ventricular demand (V-VI, 0) pacemaker was inserted after which his effort intolerance, although improved, continued to be a prominent factor while his weakness and dizzy spells persisted. Approximately one year prior to his present evaluation, he was referred to another center and the pacing system was changed. He was then able to participate in all activities without experiencing any limitations; at night, however, he often awoke from sleep experiencing brief episodes of pre-syncope and dizziness similar to those during the complete heart block and his first pacing system. These episodes were often accompanied by an overwhelming sense of doom leading to his seeking care at our Emergency Room. His cardiac examination was normal; the pulse generator was located in the left pectoral fossa. The rhythm strips obtained at the time of his presentation are shown in Figure 1.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?